The perceived value of team players: a longitudinal study of how group identification affects status in work groups

References

• Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Kennedy, J. A. (2012). Micropolitics: A new model of status hierarchies in teams. In M. A. Neale & E. A. Mannix (Eds.), Looking back, moving forward: A review of group and team-based research (pp. 49–80). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503. doi:10.1037/a0014201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 83–103). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461–468. doi:10.2307/2088276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23, 323–340. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendersky, C., & Shah, N. P. (2012). The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals’ status mobility in task groups. Organization Science, 23, 308–322. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendersky, C., & Shah, N. P. (2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 387–406. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255. doi:10.2307/2093465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. F. (Eds.). (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, J. B., Oldroyd, J. B., Thompson, J. A., Bednar, J. S., & Bunderson, J. (2014). Status and the true believer: The impact of psychological contracts on social status attributions of friendship and influence. Organization Science, 25, 73–92. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., Manzi, J. M., & Shaw, J. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4, 88–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodbeck, F. C., Guillaume, Y. R. F., & Lee, N. J. (2011). Ethnic diversity as a multilevel construct: The combined effects of dissimilarity, group diversity, and societal status on learning performance in work groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1198–1218. doi:10.1177/0022022110383314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, W. J., & Draper, D. (2000). Implementation and performance issues in the Bayesian and likelihood fitting of multilevel models. Computational Statistics, 15, 391–420. doi:10.1007/s001800000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557–591. doi:10.2307/3556637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzaglo, G., & Wheelan, S. A. (1999). Facilitating work team effectiveness: Case studies from Central America. Small Group Research, 30, 108–129. doi:10.1177/104649649903000106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A., Boisnier, A. D., Spataro, S. E., Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2008). Being distinctive versus being conspicuous: The effects of numeric status and sex-stereotyped tasks on individual performance in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 141–160. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, P., Finn, C. P., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2010). Affective responses to professional dissimilarity: A matter of status. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 808–826. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125. doi:10.1037/a0030398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In J. Delamater (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 29–51). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary-school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263. doi:10.2307/2393235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576. doi:10.2307/256434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27–54). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & van den Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717–730. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123–140. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. The Academy of Management Journal, 46, 539–553. doi:10.2307/30040648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123–1137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groysberg, B., Polzer, J. T., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2011). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science, 22, 722–737. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32–52. doi:10.1177/2041386610380991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127. doi:10.1037/h0042501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., Beersma, B., & Schouten, M. E. (2012). Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review, 37, 82–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., van Leeuwen, E., & van Santen, W. (2003). Dragging down and dragging up: How relative group status affects responses to common fate. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 275–288. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.4.275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis; techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• James, L., Demaree, R., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jans, L., Postmes, T., & van der Zee, K. I. (2012). Sharing differences: The inductive route to social identity formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1145–1149. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver-Linn, E. (2012). Implicit science stereotypes mediate the relationship between gender and academic participation. Sex Roles, 66, 220–234. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 127–137. doi:10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. doi:10.1080/19416520802211628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68. doi:10.1080/14792779543000011
   Google Scholar
• Meeussen, L., Delvaux, E., & Phalet, K. (2014). Becoming a group: Value convergence and emergent work group identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 235–248. doi:10.1111/bjso.12021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeussen, L., Otten, S., & Phalet, K. (2014). Managing diversity: How leaders’ multiculturalism and colorblindness affect work group functioning. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 629–644. doi:10.1177/1368430214525809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., Fetterman, J. D., Flagg, J. J., & Swanenburg, K. L. (2009). Behavioral assessment practices among social psychologists who study small groups. In C. R. Agnew, D. E. Carlston, W. G. Graziano, & J. R. Kelly (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 28–53). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Neeley, T. B. (2013). Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organization Science, 24, 476–497. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1754–1774. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel, J., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127–137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (1999). Social identification, affective commitment and individual effort on behalf of the group. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. J. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 184–204). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi:10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp, Released. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367–386. doi:10.1093/sf/70.2.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76–88. doi:10.2307/2095043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008, June). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.quantpsy.org
   Google Scholar
• Sleebos, E., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (2006). The carrot and the stick: Affective commitment and acceptance anxiety as motives for discretionary group efforts by respected and disrespected group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 244–255. doi:10.1177/0146167205282147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, R. I., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Identity formation in multiparty negotiations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 167–187. doi:10.1348/014466607X216124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wheterell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York, NY: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, H., & van Engen, M. L. (2013). A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 223–241. doi:10.1111/joop.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & Paauwe, J. (2012). Reframing the business case for diversity: A values and virtues perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 73–84. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1434-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology, 49, 357–371. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to group-oriented efforts. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1055–1060. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23–43. doi:10.1177/000312240907400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2005). Member status and information exchange in decision-making groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 7, 143–168. doi:10.1016/S1534-0856(05)07007-6
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S., Rothgerber, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and individual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389–413. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01181.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar