Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements

References

• Becker, J., Glick, P., Ilic, M., & Bohner, G. (2011). Damned if she does, damned if she doesn’t: Consequences of accepting versus confronting patronizing help for the female target and male actor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 761–773. doi:10.1002/ejsp.823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S., & Bem, D. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernat, M., & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 707–724. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosak, J., & Sczesny, S. (2008). Am I the right candidate? Self-ascribed fit of women and men to a leadership position. Sex Roles, 58, 682–688. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9380-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, F., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2002). Das generische Maskulinum und die Alternativen: Empirische Studien zur Wirkung generischer Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen. Germanistische Linguistik, 167/168, 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, F., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2005). Cognitive effects of masculine generics in German: An overview of empirical findings. Communications, 30, 1–21. doi:10.1515/comm.2005.30.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst. (2009). Geschlechtergerechte Stellenausschreibungen. Unabhängiger Bericht der Gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft iS §3 Abs 5 GBK/GAW-Gesetz. Wien. Retrieved from http://www.bundesregierung.at/DocView.axd?CobId=34384
   Google Scholar
• Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafó, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365–376. doi:10.1038/nrn3502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423. doi:10.1177/0146167299025004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancellerie fédérale. (2000). Guide de formulation non sexiste. Retrieved from http://www.bk.admin.ch/dokumentation/sprachen/04908/05037/index.html?lang=fr
   Google Scholar
• Chatard, A., Guimont, S., & Martinot, D. (2005). Impact de la féminisation lexicale des professions sur l’auto-efficacité des élèves: Une remise en cause de l’universalisme masculin? L’année Psychologique, 105, 249–272. doi:10.3406/psy.2005.29694
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., & English, L. (1984). Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: Effects on recall. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 373–381. doi:10.1007/BF01068152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701–718. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., … Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33. doi:10.1348/014466608X314935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225–248. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 62–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B., & Ryan, M. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163–187. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Europäisches Parlament. (2009). Geschlechtergerechter Sprachgebrauch im Europäischen Parlament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/publications/2009/0001/P6_PUB(2009)0001_DE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Report on progress on equality between women and men in 2010. The gender balance in business leadership. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2767/99441
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2008). El lenguaje no sexista en el Paramento Europeo. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/publications/2009/0001/P6_PUB%282009%290001_ES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, U., Gygax, P., Sarrasin, O., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2008). Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 206–212. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.1.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzia, L., Ryan, M. K., Balluerka, N., & Aritzeta, A. (2012). Think crisis–think female: Further evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 603–628. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2011.591572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 23, 629–643. doi:10.1007/BF00289252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 109–128. doi:10.1037/a0022530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleichbehandlungsgesetz. (2004). Gebot der geschlechtsneutralen Stellenausschreibung (BGBI I 2004/66 idF 2005/82). Retrieved from http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2004_I_66/BGBLA_2004_I_66.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 178–186. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, W. (2000). About some misconceptions and the discontent with statistical tests in psychology. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 5, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, W. (2002). The examination of psychological hypotheses by planned contrasts referring to two-factor interactions in fixed-effects ANOVA. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 7, 49–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Does generic he increase male bias in the user’s imagery? Sex Roles, 19, 785–799. doi:10.1007/BF00288993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189–198. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2007). Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress. Advances in Group Processes, 24, 47–77. doi:10.1016/S0882-6145(07)24003-2
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 379–388. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, E. (2000). Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen. Sprache und Kognition - Zeitschrift für Sprach- & Kognitionspsychologie und ihre Grenzgebiete, 19, 3–13. doi:10.1024//0253-4533.19.12.3
   Google Scholar
• Hellinger, M. (2004). Vorschläge zur sprachlichen Gleichbehandlung von Frauen und Männern. In K. M. Eichhoff-Cyrus (Ed.), Adam, Eva und die Sprache (pp. 275–291). Mannheim: Duden Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. (1986). The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from top jobs. The Wall Street Journal, 24, 1–28. Special Report, March.
   Google Scholar
• Irmen, L., & Rossberg, N. (2004). Gender markedness of language: The impact of grammatical and nonlinguistic information on the mental representation of person information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 272–307. doi:10.1177/0261927X04266810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, G., Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. (1996). Testing the “glass ceiling” effect on gender differences in upper level management: The case of innovator orientation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 29–41. doi:10.1080/13594329608414837
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings, F., Sczesny, S., & Kluge, A. (2011). Stereotypical inferences as mediators of age discrimination: The role of competence and warmth. British Journal of Management, 22, 187–201. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00721.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land Hessen. (2005). Gemeinsame Geschäftsordnung der Ministerien des Landes Hessen. Retrieved from http://starweb.hessen.de/cache/hessen/ggo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Land Oberösterreich. (2003). Gender Mainstreaming im Land Oberösterreich. Leitlinien für einen geschlechtergerechten Sprachgebrauch. Retrieved from http://www.frauenreferat-ooe.at/xbcr/SID-C2D7F16C-72F641A0/praes_leitlinien_Gender.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lujansky-Lammer, E. (2006). Stellenausschreibungen – ein Spiegelbild der Gesellschaft ( Diploma thesis). Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, Graz.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, E. F., Horvath, L. K., Maass, A., & Sczesny, S. (2012, March). Gender-fair language as a double-edged sword: Women gaining professional visibility at the cost of status loss? Paper presented at the 55th Conference for Experimental Psychologists, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Mucchi-Faina, A. (2005). Visible or influential? Language reforms and gender (in)equality. Social Science Information, 44, 189–215. doi:10.1177/0539018405050466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S. H. (1990). Androcentric coding of man and his in memory by language users. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 455–464. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90069-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olian, J. D., Schwab, D. P., & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 180–195. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, A. (1998). Feminist language planning: Has it been worthwhile. Linguistik Online, 1, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2011). Think crisis–think female: The glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager–think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 470–484. doi:10.1037/a0022133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salovey, P. (2000). Results that get results. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Guide to publishing in Psychology journals (pp. 121–132). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100. doi:10.1037/h0037128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. (1998). Gender wage discrimination bias? A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 947–973. doi:10.2307/146404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 757–769. doi:10.1177/0146167211406434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409–429. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper-Collins.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (1999). Guidelines for gender-neutral language. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001149/114950mo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vervecken, D., Hannover, B., & Wolter, I. (2013). Changing (s)expectations: How gender-fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 208–220. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar