I want to be creative, but … preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393–399. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, 76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R&D laboratory. Technical Report 30. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75–105. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences 1. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 26–44. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 400–414. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/peps.1991.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, N., & Scheffer, D. (2011). Seeking flow in the achievement domain: The achievement flow motive behind flow experience. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J. M. (2014). The primal mark: How the beginning shapes the end in the development of creative ideas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2000). Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Experimental Economics, 2, 227–238. doi:10.1023/A:1009962612354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research. Cross-cultural research and methodology series (Vol. 8, pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity, and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 52, 95–121. doi:10.1002/hrm.v52.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. (1998). The virtual workplace: A reality now. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 37, 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2011). Dynamic patterns of flow in the workplace: Characterizing within individual variability using a complexity science approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 627–651. doi:10.1002/job.v32.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. (2006). Flow on the net-detecting web users’ positive affects and their flow states. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csiksczentmihalyi, M., Kolo, C., & Baur, T. (2004). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 51, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Prague, Czech Republic: Lidové Noviny.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience: Steps toward enhancing the quality of life. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997a). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997b). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation: A study of adolescents. Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 45–71.
   Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E. (2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 266–280. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger, S. J., Leong, F. T. L., & Ulicni, S. K. (1996). On traits and values: With special reference to openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 23–41. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70, 35–36.
   Google Scholar
• Drolet, A., Luce, M. F., & Simonson, I. (2009). When does choice reveal preference? Moderators of heuristic versus goal-based choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 137–147. doi:10.1086/596305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2000). Preference formation. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2011). Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 367–387. doi:10.1080/13594321003590630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Stinglhamber, F., Shanock, L., & Randall, A. T. (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 755–775. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 421–435. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1006
   Google Scholar
• Erez, M., Earley, P. C., & Hulin, C. L. (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 50–66. doi:10.2307/256061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, M., & Kanfer, F. H. (1983). The role of goal acceptance in goal setting and task performance. Academy of Management Review, 8, 454–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagenson-Eland, E. A., Marks, M. A., & Amendola, K. L. (1997). Perceptions of mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 29–42. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1997.1592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618–630. doi:10.2307/30040653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317–327. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/pspr.1998.2.issue-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388. doi:10.2307/3150980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullagar, C. J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2009). Flow at work: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 595–615. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1348/096317908X357903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (1958). Multiple-choice decision-behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 71, 710–717. doi:10.2307/1420328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human–computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 381–391. doi:10.1080/00223980.1994.9712742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73–96. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Rothbard, N. P. (2013). When in doubt, seize the day? Security values, prosocial values, and proactivity under ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, Forthcoming, 98, 810–819. doi:10.1037/a0032873
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79–109. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self–other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 353–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. The Journal of Marketing, 60, 50–68. doi:10.2307/1251841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). The flow scales manual. Morgantown: WV Fitness Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., Thomas, P. R., Marsh, H. W., & Smethurst, C. J. (2001). Relationships between flow, self-concept, psychological skills, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 129–153. doi:10.1080/104132001753149865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 18910–18914. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102895108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. S. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 355–368. doi:10.1080/00224549909598391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R. (1988). Flow and writing. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 150–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez–Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753–772. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. W., Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1989). Goal setting theory and job performance. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137. doi:10.1037/h0035519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litchfield, R. C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal-based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649–668. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.32465708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157–189. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Loveland, M. T. (2003). Religious switching: Preference development, maintenance, and change. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 147–157. doi:10.1111/jssr.2003.42.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathwick, C., & Rigdon, E. (2004). Play, flow, and the online search experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 324–332. doi:10.1086/422111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, W. (1932). Of the words character and personality. Journal of Personality, 1, 3–16. doi:10.1111/jopy.1932.1.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 118–131. doi:10.2307/3069340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, M. J., & Fullagar, C. J. (2008). Motivation and flow: Toward an understanding of the dynamics of the relation in architecture students. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 533–556. doi:10.3200/JRLP.142.5.533-556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montag, T., Maertz, C. P., & Baer, M. (2012). A critical analysis of the workplace creativity criterion space. Journal of Management, 38, 1362–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Duhachek, A. (2003). The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham, G., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634. doi:10.2307/256657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 745–771. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(04)00036-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, R. C. (2008). Is expertise a necessary precondition for creativity?: A case of four novice learning group facilitators. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 59–76. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., O’Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 9–23. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Robinson-Morral, E. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Santo, J. B. (2012). Evaluation of self-perceptions of creativity: Is it a useful criterion? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 107–114. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.676980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005). Explicit instructions to be creative and original: A comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 15, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10902-005-8854-8
   Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179–185. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503. doi:10.2307/256689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherkat, D. E., & Wilson, J. (1995). Preferences, constraints, and choices in religious markets: An examination of religious switching and apostasy. Social Forces, 73, 993–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Avolio, B. J. (1999). Leadership style, anonymity, and creativity in group decision support systems: The mediating role of optimal flow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 227–256. doi:10.1002/jocb.1999.33.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148. doi:10.2307/3069429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Anomalies: Preference reversals. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 201–211. doi:10.1257/jep.4.2.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333–352. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, A. J. (1988). Variations in mothers’ self-esteem in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 661–668. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology-an International Review, 51, 355–387. doi:10.1111/apps.2002.51.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, K. (1994). Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy. Human Performance, 7, 55–78. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0701_5
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. The American Political Science Review, 81, 3–22. doi:10.2307/1960776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1994). Why self-interest means less outside of a social context: Cultural contributions to a theory of rational choices. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 131–159. doi:10.1177/0951692894006002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Lin, C. S., & Lin, J. (2011). An empirical investigation of online users’ keyword ads search behaviours. Online Information Review, 35, 177–193. doi:10.1108/14684521111127998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yemm, G. (2013). FT essential guide to leading your team: How to set goals, measure performance and reward talent. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Publishing International.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010a). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: A curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 862–873. doi:10.1037/a0020173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010b). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & George, J. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696. doi:10.2307/3069410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Shin, S. J., & Cannella, A. A. (2008). Employee self-perceived creativity after mergers and acquisitions: Interactive effects of threat—opportunity perception, access to resources, and support for creativity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 397–421. doi:10.1177/0021886308328010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar