657
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects of rater conscientiousness on evaluations of task and contextual performance of older and younger co-workers

, , , &
Pages 707-721 | Received 11 Sep 2014, Accepted 24 Jan 2016, Published online: 03 Mar 2016

References

  • Alicke, M. D., Dunning, D. A., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). The self in social judgment. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Ashmore, R. D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 37–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Age and work performance in nonmanagerial jobs: The effects of experience and occupational type. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 407–422. doi:10.2307/256331
  • Bal, A. C., Reiss, A. E., Rudolph, C. W., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Examining positive and negative perceptions of older workers: A meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66B, 687–698. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr056
  • Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.000433
  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9, 9–30. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2001.9.issue-1&2
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader–member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567. doi:10.2307/257068
  • Bell, M. P. (2012). Diversity in organizations. Mason, OH: South-Western College.
  • Bernardin, H. J., Tyler, C. L., & Villanova, P. (2009). Rating level and accuracy as a function of rater personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 300–310. doi:10.1111/ijsa.2009.17.issue-3
  • Bernardin, H. J., Villanova, P., & Cooke, D. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 232–236. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.232
  • Bertolino, M., Truxillo, D. M., & Fraccaroli, F. (2013). Age effects on perceived personality and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 867–885. doi:10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0222
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (Vol. 71, pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance : The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
  • Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168–177. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.168
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Celejewski, I., & Dion, K. K. (1998). Self-perception and perception of age groups as a function of the perceiver’s category membership. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47, 205–216. doi:10.2190/GL4R-FJ7G-XGEK-MRR6
  • Cleveland, J. N., Festa, R. M., & Montgomery, L. (1988). Applicant pool composition and job perceptions: Impact on decisions regarding an older applicant. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 112–125. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(88)90009-7
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Deal, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2010). Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 191–199. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9177-2
  • Edwards, J. R. (1994). Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management, 20, 683–689.
  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613.
  • Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
  • Finkelstein, L. M., Burke, M. J., & Raju, M. S. (1995). Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 652–663. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.652
  • Finkelstein, L. M., & Farrell, S. K. (2007). An expanded view of age bias in the workplace. In K. S. Shultz & G. A. Adams (Eds.), Aging and work in the 21st century. Applied psychology series (pp. 73–108). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Finkelstein, L. M., Ryan, K. M., & King, E. B. (2013). What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based metastereotypes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 633–657. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.673279
  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357–411). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652
  • Gibson, K. J., Zerbe, W. J., & Franken, R. E. (1993). The influence of rater and ratee age on judgments of work-related attributes. The Journal of Psychology, 127, 271–280. doi:10.1080/00223980.1993.9915561
  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., & Cloninger, C. R. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
  • Gordon, R. A., & Arvey, R. D. (2004). Age bias in laboratory and field settings: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 468–492.
  • Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
  • Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (1995). Changing conceptions and practices in performance appraisal. In A. Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 451–481). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hedge, J. W., Borman, W. C., & Birkeland, S. A. (2001). History and development of multisource feedback as a methodology. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & A. H. Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes (pp. 15–32). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  • Hedge, J. W., Borman, W. C., & Lammlein, S. E. (2006). The aging workforce: Realities, myths, and implications for organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 353–370. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.94.2.353
  • Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80–105.
  • Kane, J. S., Bernardin, H. J., Villanova, P., & Peyrefitte, J. (1995). Stability of rater leniency: Three studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1039–1051.
  • Kite, M. E., Stockdale, G. D., Whitley, B. E., & Johnson, B. T. (2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta‐analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 241–266.
  • Krueger, J. I. (2003). Return of the ego — Self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 585–590.
  • Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance ratings. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–102.
  • LePine, J. A., Buckman, B. R., Crawford, E. R., & Methot, J. R. (2011). A review of research on personality in teams: Accounting for pathways spanning levels of theory and analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 311–330.
  • Lepine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups. Academy of Management Review, 26, 67−84.
  • Lieberman, D., Oum, R., & Kurzban, R. (2008). The family of fundamental social categories includes kinship: Evidence from the memory confusion paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 998–1012.
  • Manfredi, S., & Vickers, L. (2009). Retirement and age discrimination: Managing retirement in higher education. Industrial Law Journal, 38, 343–364.
  • Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.
  • McEvoy, G. M., & Cascio, W. F. (1989). Cumulative evidence of the relationship between employee age and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 11–17.
  • Müller, A., De Lange, A., Weigl, M., Van der Heijden, B., Ackermans, J., & Wilkenloh, J. (2015). Task performance among employees above age 65: The role of cognitive functioning and job-demand control. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 296–308.
  • Murphy, K. R., & DeShon, R. (2000). Interrater correlations do not estimate the reliability of job performance ratings. Personnel Psychology, 53, 873–900.
  • Mussweiler, T. (2003). When egocentrism breeds distinctness — Comparison processes in social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 581–584.
  • Nelson, T. D. (Ed.). (2004). Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 207–221. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00402
  • Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 392–423. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Evaluating six common stereotypes about older workers with meta-analytic data. Personnel Psychology, 65, 821–858.
  • North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982–997.
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Perry, E. L., & Bourhis, A. C. (1998). A closer look at the role of applicant age in selection decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1670–1697.
  • Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Matz-Costa, C., & James, J. (2012). Through a different looking glass: The prism of age. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Center on Aging & Work, Boston College.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.
  • Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158–188. doi:10.1177/0149206308318617
  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course : A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
  • Roch, S. G., Ayman, R., Newhouse, N., & Harris, M. (2006). Effect of identifiability, rating audience, and conscientiousness on rating level. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 53–62.
  • Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58, 1009–1037.
  • Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419–450. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716
  • Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 956–970.
  • Sears, G. J., & Rowe, P. M. (2003). A personality-based similar-to-me effect in the employment interview: Conscientiousness, affect-versus competence-mediated interpretations, and the role of job relevance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 35, 13–24.
  • Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J. J. (1993). The self in impression formation: Trait centrality and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 347–357.
  • Shore, L. M., & Goldberg, C. B. (2005). Age discrimination in the workplace. In R. L. Dipboye & A. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work (pp. 203–225). Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Singer, M. S., & Sewell, C. (1989). Applicant age and selection interview decisions: Effect of information exposure on age discrimination in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 42, 135–154.
  • Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2012). Development of big five domains and facets in adulthood: Mean‐level age trends and broadly versus narrowly acting mechanisms. Journal of Personality, 80, 881–914.
  • Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330–348.
  • Strauss, J. P., Barrick, M. R., & Connerley, M. L. (2001). An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 637–657.
  • Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A metaanalytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.
  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Statistics on average effective age and official age of retirement in OECD countries. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/ageingandemploymentpolicies-statisticsonaverageeffectiveageofretirement.htm
  • Truxillo, D. M., McCune, E. A., Bertolino, M., & Fraccaroli, F. (2012). Perceptions of older versus younger workers in terms of big five facets, proactive personality, cognitive ability, and job performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2607–2639. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00954
  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A., III (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.
  • Twenge, J. M. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 201–210.
  • Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (2005). Contextual and rater factors affecting rating behavior. Group & Organization Management, 30, 89–98.
  • Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (2002). Does conscientiousness moderate the relationship between attitudes and beliefs regarding performance appraisal and rating. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 218–224.
  • Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 211–279). San Diego, CA: Academic.
  • Uleman, J. S., & Saribay, S. A. (2012). Initial impressions of others. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 337–366). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Uleman, J. S., Saribay, S. A., & Gonzalez, C. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329–360.
  • Waldman, D. A., & Avolio, B. J. (1986). A meta-analysis of age differences in job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 33–38.
  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.
  • Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). The effect of age and role information on expectations for big five personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1482–1496.
  • Yun, G. J., Donahue, L. M., Dudley, N. M., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). Rater personality, rating format, and social context: Implications for performance appraisal ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 97–107.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.