Leaned teamwork fattens workplace innovation: the relationship between task complexity, team learning and team proactivity

References

• Antoni, C. H. (2005). Effects of team task structure on team climate for innovation and team outcomes. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies—Journal of IET Research Centre, 1, 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). Extending and refining the dialectic perspective on innovation: There is nothing as practical as a good theory; nothing as theoretical as a good practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspective on Science and Practice, 2, 363–373. doi:10.1111/iops.2009.2.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136. doi:10.1111/peps.2011.64.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. C. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462. doi:10.1177/014920630002600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane, S. J., Bosak, J., Flood, P. C., & Demerouti, E. (2012). Job design under lean manufacturing and its impact on employee outcomes. Organizational Psychology Review, 3, 41–61. doi:10.1177/2041386612456412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van Den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., Dillon, J. R., & Roloff, K. S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 269–314. doi:10.1080/078559811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1084–1102. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453–470. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spector, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 102–115. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56, 591–605. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 105–130. doi:10.1080/13594320344000075
   Google Scholar
• Hasle, P., Bojesen, A., Langaa Jensen, P., & Bramming, P. (2012). Lean and the working environment: A review of the literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 829–849. doi:10.1108/01443571211250103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64, 408–417. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, A. (2011). Teamwork on the line can pay off down the line. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23, 75–96. doi:10.1108/13665621111108765
   Google Scholar
• Lantz, A., Hansen, N., & Antoni, C. (2015). Participative work design in lean production: A strategy for dissolving the paradox between standardized work and team proactivity by stimulating team learning? Journal of Workplace Learning, 27, 19–33. doi:10.1108/JWL-03-2014-0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. doi:10.1037/a0013773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Garza, A. S., & Campion, M. A. (2012). Work design. In N. W. Schmitt & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, volume 12, industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 525–559). NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison Wolfe, E. W., & Phelps, C. (1999). Taking charge: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Netland, T. H. (2013). Company-specific production systems: Managing production improvement in global firms (Doctoral dissertation at NTNU, 2013:340). NTNU-trykk, Trondheim. ISBN 978-82-471-4822-8.
   Google Scholar
• Oertzen, T., Brandmaier, A. M., & Tsang, S. (2015). Structural equation modeling with Ωnyx. Structural Equation Modeling, A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 148–161. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.935842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K. (2003). Longitudinal effects of lean production on employee outcomes and the mediating role of work characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 620–634. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Scully, J., & West, M. A. (2005). Intergroup conflict and intergroup effectiveness in organizations: Theory and scale development. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 177–203. doi:10.1080/13594320444000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C. M., Uitdewilligen, S., & Passos, A. M. (2015). A temporal common ground for learning: The moderating effect of shared mental models on the relation between team learning behaviours and performance improvement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 710–725. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1049158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelsbergh, C. M. J. H., Van Der Heijden, B. M. J. M., & Poell, R. F. (2009). Measurement instrument for team-learning behaviours. The development and empirical validation of an multi-dimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviours. Small Group Research, 40, 578–607. doi:10.1177/1046496409340055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489–505. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Woltjer, G., & Kirschner, P. (2011). Team learning: Building shared mental models. Instructional Science. An international Journal of the Learning Sciences., 39, 283–301. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Haar, S., Segers, M., & Jehn, K. A. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of emergency management teams: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Emergency Management, 9, 258–275. doi:10.1504/IJEM.2013.058547
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Woerkom, M., & Croon, M. (2009). The relationships between team learning activities and team performance. Personnel Review, 38, 560–577. doi:10.1108/00483480910978054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpert, W., Österreich, R., Gablenz-Kolokovic, S., & Resch, M. (1983). Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Regulationserfordernissen in der Arbeitstätigkeit (VERA) [A method to assess demand on regulation in work]. Handbuch und Manual. Cologne, Germany: TÜV Rheinland.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, W. G., & Lampert, B. (2010). Analysis of collective regulation and cooperation-relevant attitudes in industrial group work. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 1, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, W. G., Resch, M., & Volpert, W. (1986). Prospective evaluation of working tasks in flexible manufacturing system. In P. Brödner (Ed.), Skill based automated manufacturing (pp. 23–27). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A., Hirst, G., Richter, A., & Shipton, H. (2004). Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 269–299. doi:10.1080/13594320444000092
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, C. (2015). Reembedding lean: The Japanese cultural and religious context of a world changing management concept. International Journal of Sociology, 45, 95–111. doi:10.1080/00207659.2015.1061852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A., & West, M. (2010). The psychology of work and organizations. Hampshire: Cengage learning EMEA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 333–359. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar