Time pressure with state vigour and state absorption: are they non-linearly related?

References

• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963–970. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B. (2014). Daily fluctuations in work engagement: An overview and current directions. European Psychologist, 19, 227–236. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands-resources theory. In P. Y. Chen & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Work and wellbeing: Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 37–64). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170–180. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Petrou, P., & Tsaousis, I. (2012). Inequity in work and intimate relationships: A Spillover-Crossover model. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25, 491–506. doi:10.1080/10615806.2011.619259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Van Emmerik, H., Geurts, S. A., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Recovery turns job demands into challenges: A diary study on work engagement and performance (Unpublished Working Paper). Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2012). lme 4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, N., Wood, R. E., & Minbashian, A. (2010). It depends how you look at it: On the relationship between neuroticism and conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 593–601. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, S. S., Mills, M. J., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Work engagement and work-family facilitation: Making homes happier through positive affective spillover. Human Relations, 65, 1155–1177. doi:10.1177/0018726712440295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jonge, J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1998). Job characteristics and employee well-being: A test of Warr’s Vitamin Model in health care workers using structural equation modelling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 387–407. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199807)19:43.0.CO;2-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Sonnentag, S., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 276–295. doi:10.1002/job.760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurofound (2015). First findings: Sixth European working conditions survey Brüssel: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1409–1422. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. G., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Activation theory and job design: Review and reconceptualization. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 81–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19, 72–91. doi:10.1037/a0032138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). How dentists cope with their job demands and stay engaged: The moderating role of job resources. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113, 479–487. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00250.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement. A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L. (2012). Why researchers should think “within-person”: A paradigmatic rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 43–61). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M.-R. (2007). A review of employee well-being and innovativeness: An opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 299–306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00442.x
   Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., Aw, S. S. Y., & Pluut, H. (2015). Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 827–838. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1071422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1039–1050. doi:10.2307/3069447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnel, J., Sonnentag, S., & Bledow, R. (2012). Resources and time pressure as day‐level antecedents of work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 181–198. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764–775. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 149–171. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Multilevel modeling analyses of diary-style data. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 43–61). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 543–565. doi:10.1002/job.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438–454. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. M., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008). Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 69–93. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2014). A critical review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for improving work and health. In G. Bauer & O. Hämming (Eds.), Bridging occupational, organizational and public health (pp. 43–68). Dodrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A., Ohly, S., & Kleespies, N. (2015). Time pressure promotes work engagement: Test of illegitimate tasks as boundary condition. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 28–36. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, B. J., & Auton, J. C. (2015). The merits of measuring challenge and hindrance appraisals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28, 121–143. doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.931378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmer, N. K., Zapf, D., & Dunckel, H. (1999). Instrument zur stressbezogenen Tätigkeitsanalyse ISTA [Instrument for Stress-Related Job Analysis ISTA]. In H. Dunckel (Ed.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren (pp. 179–204). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., & Demerouti, E. (2010). Not all days are created equal: The concept of state work engagement. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 25–38). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., & Kühnel, J. (2016). Coming back to work in the morning: Psychological detachment and reattachment as predictors of work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/ocp0000020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E. J., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 842–853. doi:10.1037/a0028292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., & Niessen, C. (2008). Staying vigorous until work is over: The role of trait vigour, day-specific work experiences and recovery. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 435–458. doi:10.1348/096317908X310256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadić, M., Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. G. M. (2015). Challenge versus hindrance job demands and well-being: A diary study on the moderating role of job resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 702–725. doi:10.1111/joop.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanskanen, J., Taipale, S., & Antilla, T. (2014). Revealing hidden curvilinear relations between work engagement and its predictors: Demonstrating the added value of generalized additive model (GAM). Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9599-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teuchmann, K., Totterdell, P., & Parker, S. K. (1999). Rushed, unhappy, and drained: An experience sampling study of relations between time pressure, perceived control, mood, and emotional exhaustion in a group of accountants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 37–54. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.4.1.37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van den Broeck, A., de Cuyper, N., de Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the job demands-resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 735–759. doi:10.1080/13594320903223839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work & Stress, 8, 84–97. doi:10.1080/02678379408259982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, P. (2005). Work, well-being, and mental health. In J. Barling, E. K. Kelloway, & M. R. Frone (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 547–573). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 505–516. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmer, P. S., Semmer, N. K., Kälin, W., Jacobshagen, N., & Meier, L. L. (2012). The ambivalence of challenge stressors: Time pressure associated with both negative and positive well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 422–433. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2013). State work engagement: The significance of within-person fluctuations. In A. B. Bakker & K. Daniels (Eds.), A day in the life of a happy worker (pp. 25–40). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183–200. doi:10.1348/096317908X285633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Dollard, M. F., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2007). When do job demands particularly predict burnout? The moderating role of job resources. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 766–786. doi:10.1108/02683940710837714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., A. B., Heuven, E., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 345–356. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.13.4.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, D., Tzischinski, O., & Epstein, R. (2003). Effects of energy availability on immediate and delayed emotional reactions to work events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1082–1093. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar