The communality-bonus effect for male transformational leaders – leadership style, gender, and promotability

References

• Abele, A. E., Uchronski, M., Suitner, C., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217. doi:10.1002/ejsp.575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust, F., Diedenhofen, B., Ullrich, S., & Musch, J. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 527–535. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462. doi:10.1348/096317999166789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, B. A., Dill, K. E., Greathouse, S. A., Charlton, K., & Mulholland, A. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244–275. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernat, M. (2012). Stereotypes and shifting standards. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1–59. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosak, J., & Sczesny, S. (2011). Exploring the dynamics of incongruent beliefs about women and leaders. British Journal of Management, 22, 254–269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00731.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Communion and agency judgments of women and men as a function of role information and response format. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1148–1155. doi:10.1002/ejsp.538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270–283. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D. (2006). Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, July-August issue, 52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfe, J., & Goihl, K. (2002). Deutsche überarbeitete und ergänzte Version des „Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire“ (MLQ). In A. Glöckner-Rist (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. Version 6.00. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 149–190). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foels, R., Driskell, J. E., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (2000). The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction: An integration. Small Group Research, 31, 676–701. doi:10.1177/104649640003100603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, M. Z., Furniss, A. H., Hills, M. J., & Paterson, T. J. (1992). Perceptions of gender-role characteristics and transformational and transactional leadership behaviours. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 311–319. doi:10.2466/pms.1992.75.1.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 353–363. doi:10.1177/0361684316634081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10, 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentschel, T., Shemla, M., Wegge, J., & Kearney, E. (2013). Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Group Research, 44, 33–61. doi:10.1177/1046496412470725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2016). Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 316–328. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1067611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A. (2001). Identifying, assessing, and selecting senior leaders. In S. J. Zaccaro & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership - Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders (pp. 305–346). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. L., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2015). Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 828–845. doi:10.1037/a0038510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. (2015). The authenticity paradox. Harvard Business Review, 93, 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36–51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536–546. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark, R., & Shamir, B. (2013). The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collective selves and further effects on followers. In B. J. Avolio & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 77–101)). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited..
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 77–89. doi:10.1037/a0013077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knipfer, K., Shaughnessy, B. A., Hentschel, T., & Schmid, E. (2017). Unlocking women’s leadership potential: A curricular example for developing female leaders in academia. Journal of Management Education, 41, 272–302. doi:10.1177/1052562916673863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, A. M., Mitchell, A. A., Eagly, A. H., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, F., De Jong, S. B., & Bruch, H. (2013). Consequences of collective-focused leadership and differentiated individual-focused leadership. Journal of Management, 42, 886–914. doi:10.1177/0149206313498903
   Google Scholar
• Luthar, H. K. (1996). Gender differences in evaluation of performance and leadership ability: Autocratic vs. democratic managers. Sex Roles, 35, 337–361. doi:10.1007/bf01664773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, K. J. (1997). Gender-related stereotypes of transformational and transactional leadership. Sex Roles, 37, 209–225. doi:10.1023/a:1025647811219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2013). A fairer way to make hiring and promotion decisions. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/08/a-fairer-way-to-make-hiring-an
   Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455. doi:10.1037/a0028085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, G., & Wolfram, H.-J. (2008). Leadership and effectiveness in the context of gender: The role of leaders’ verbal behaviour. British Journal of Management, 19, 4–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00521.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molero, F., Cuadrado, I., Navas, M., & Morales, J. F. (2007). Relations and effects of transformational leadership: A comparative analysis with traditional leadership styles. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 358–368. doi:10.1017/S1138741600006624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 140. doi:10.1037/a0018093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, G. D., & Ditto, P. H. (1997). Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientific information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 636–653. doi:10.1177/0146167297236007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., Berger-Selman, F., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Innovation in top management teams: Minority dissent, transformational leadership, and radical innovations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 310–322. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.734038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1129–1145. doi:10.1037/a0036751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2004). Sustaining cultural beliefs in the face of their violation: The case of gender stereotypes. In M. Schaller & C.S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 259–280). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reuvers, M., Van Engen, M. L., Vinkenburg, C. J., & Wilson-Evered, E. (2008). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: Exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 227–244. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00487.x
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). If you’re looking at the cell means, you’re not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero). Psychological Bulletin, 110, 574–576. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K. (2016). Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 446–455. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumberg, R. L., & Flynn, F. (2016). Self-reliance: A gender perspective on its relationship to communality and leadership evaluations. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, B. A., Mislin, A. A., & Hentschel, T. (2015). Should he chitchat? The benefits of small talk for male versus female negotiators. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 105–117. doi:10.1080/01973533.2014.999074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E. (1955). A comparison of two types of leadership in various communication nets. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 127–134. doi:10.1037/h0041129
   Google Scholar
• Stempel, C. R., Rigotti, T., & Mohr, G. (2015). Think transformational leadership – Think female? Leadership, 11, 259–280. doi:10.1177/1742715015590468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker, R. A., & Wayne, S. J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21, 739–756. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinkenburg, C. J., Van Engen, M. L., Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. K., & Lippitt, R. (1960). Autocracy and democracy. An experimental inquiry. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. J., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2016). The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women’s implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 165–197. doi:10.1037/bul0000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, H.-J., & Mohr, G. (2010). Gender-typicality of economic sectors and gender‐composition of working groups as moderating variables in leadership research. Gender in Management: an International Journal, 25, 320–339. doi:10.1108/17542411011048182
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. B., Tsui, A. S., & Kinicki, A. J. (2010). Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 90–106. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48037079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar