When proactivity produces a power struggle: how supervisors’ power motivation affects their support for employees’ promotive voice

References

• Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 67–97.
   Google Scholar
• Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., & Enders, C. K. (1996). The effects of nonnormality and number of response categories on reliability. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Pugh, S. D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 629–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader–member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernat, M. (1989). Motives and values to achieve: Different constructs with different effects. Journal of Personality, 57, 69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2011). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 567–598). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y.-R. (2011). What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organization Science, 22, 1040–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 84–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 851–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaburu, D. S., Lorinkova, N. M., & van Dyne, L. (2013). Employees’ social context and change-oriented citizenship: A meta-analysis of leader, coworker, and organizational influences. Group & Organization Management, 38, 291–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2015). Does it matter how I say it? The effects of constructive and complaining forms of idea presentation on supervisory evaluations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 104–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & de Luque, M. F. S. (2010). Proactivity with image in mind: How employee and manager characteristics affect evaluations of proactive behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 347–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 63–80). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1013–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfe, J., Elprana, G., Gatzka, M., & Stiehl, S. (2012). FÜMO Hamburger Führungsmotivationsinventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Fedor, D. B., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Organizational politics and citizenship: Attributions of intentionality and construct definition. In M. J. Martenko (Ed.), Advances in attribution theory: An organizational perspective (pp. 231–252). Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, E. M. (1984). The power motive and reactivity to power stresses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 853–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., & Hartsen, K. M. (2006). The power motive and affective response to assertiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 598–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 528–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62, 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Wall, T. D. (2009). The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 653–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R. B., Bowler, W. M., Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2010). Organizational concern, prosocial values, or impression management? How supervisors attribute motives to organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1450–1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., Liao, H., Raub, S., & Han, J. H. (2016). What it takes to get proactive: An integrative multilevel model of the antecedents of personal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 687–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, T. M., Harrison, D. A., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2015). Who gets credit for input? Demographic and structural status cues in voice recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1765–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2011). Directional discrepancy between implicit and explicit power motives is related to well-being among managers. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W., Huang, X., & Snape, E. (2007). Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: Do supervisor-attributed motives matter? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 348–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, D. J., Stride, C. B., & Wood, S. J. (2006). The effectiveness of idea capture schemes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 325–350.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, L. J., Codding, R. S., Kleinmann, A. E., & Tucker, K. L. (2003). Assessment of reading rate in postsecondary students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 136–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., & Mead, N. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 482–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 87–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. Oxford, UK: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1982). The need for power, sympathetic activation, and illness. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 373–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbeck, F. W., Eid, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2006). Analysing multitrait-multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator: What sample size is needed for valid results? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 195–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, J. S., Villacorta, M. A., Chin, Y. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Achievement motivation in the social context: Implicit and explicit hope of success and fear of failure predict memory for and liking of successful and unsuccessful peers. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1040–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D. (2009). Mindreading: Judgments about intentionality and motives in dispositional inference. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 725–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijbom, R. B. L., Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2015a). How to get radical creative ideas into a leader’s mind? Leader’s achievement goals and subordinates’ voice of creative ideas. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijbom, R. B. L., Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2015b). Leaders’ receptivity to subordinates’ creative input: The role of achievement goals and composition of creative input. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 462–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Škerlavaj, M., Černe, M., & Dysvik, A. (2014). I get by with a little help from my supervisor: Creative-idea generation, idea implementation, and perceived supervisor support. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 987–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D. N., & Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche personality research form (PRF). Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 136–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 275–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbach, T., Fay, D., & Lauche, K. (2016). Who will be on my side? The role of peers’ achievement motivation in the evaluation of innovative ideas. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 540–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, S., MacMillan, I. C., & McGrath, R. G. (1992). Progress in research on corporate venturing. In D. L. Sexton (Ed.), The state of the art of entrepreneurship (pp. 487–519). Boston: PWS-Kent Pub.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, S. W., Maynes, T. D., Podsakoff, N. P., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 159–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. J. (2014). Serving the self from the seat of power: Goals and threats predict leaders’ self-interested behavior. Journal of Management, 40, 1365–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar