Development and test of a model of interdisciplinary competencies

References

• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of Management Development, 27, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Brandstädter, S., & Sonntag, K. (2016). Interdisciplinary collaboration: How to foster the dialogue across disciplinary borders? In B. Deml, P. Stock, R. Bruder, & C. Schlick (Eds.), Advances in ergonomic design of systems, products and processes (pp. 395–410). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond one’s own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 115–133). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48, 297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 458–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, S. Y., Gong, Y., Wang, M., Zhou, L. B., & Shi, J. (2016). When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team. Human Relations, 69, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32, 761–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2008). Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieger, I., & Rosseel, Y. (2017). Factor score path analysis: An alternative for SEM? Methodology, 13, 31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. L. (2005). Making interdisciplinary collaboration work. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration. An emerging cognitive science (pp. 245–263). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfhill, T. R., & Nielsen, T. M. (2007). Quantifying the “softer side” of management education: An example using teamwork competencies. Journal of Management Education, 31, 64–80.
   Google Scholar
• Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 353–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, A., Strobel, A., Kici, G., & Westhoff, K. (2009). Quality of the critical incident technique in practice: Interrater reliability and users’ acceptance under real conditions. Psychological Science Quarterly, 51, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R., Knight, D. B., & Bergom, I. M. (2012). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence for engineers. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, T., Lindstaedt, S. N., & Albert, D. (2005). Supporting competency development in informal workplace learning. Paper presented at the Conference for Professional Knowledge Management, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. L. (2012). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 342–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 395–437). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, S. M., & Reich, J. A. (2006). Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaborations: A method for respecting diversity in research partnerships. American Journal for Community Psychology, 38, 51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2014). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., & Rizzo, A. (2005). Interdisciplinarity: An emergent or engineered process? In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration (pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinheider, B., Bayerl, P. S., Menold, N., & Bromme, R. (2009). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung von Wissensintegrationsproblemen in interdisziplinären Projektteams (WIP) [Development and validation of a scale for knowledge integration problems in interdisciplinary teams]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 53, 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, N. S., Gordon, J. I., Rose, G. D., Getzoff, E. D., Kron, S. J., Mumford, D., … Kopell, N. J. (2003). Educating future scientists. Science, 301, 1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szostak, R. (2002). How to do interdisicplinarity: Integrating the debate. Issues in Integrative Studies, 20, 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 82–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar