Masking wrongs through brilliance: the moderating effect of vision on the relationship between abusive supervision and employee outcomes

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Shamir, B. (2016). Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 293–319.
   Google Scholar
• Awamleh, R., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 345–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Kirkpatrick, S. A. (1998). A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson, Y., Shamir, B., Avolio, B. J., & Popper, M. (2001). The relationship between vision strength, leadership style, and context. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Shapiro, D. L. (2016). Abusive leaders or master motivators? “Abusive” is in the eye of the beholder. In N. M. Ashkanasy, R. J. Bennett, & M. J. Martinko (Eds.), Understanding the high performance workplace: The line between motivation and abuse (pp. 252–276). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boies, K., Fiset, J., & Gill, H. (2015). Communication and trust are key: Unlocking the relationship between leadership and team performance and creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 1080–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breevaart, K., & Zacher, H. (2019). Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez-faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 384–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M. D., Talaifar, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s mechanical turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro, R. A. (1981). The path to power: The years of Lyndon Johnson. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., & Shapiro, D. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 53–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Lie for a dime: When most prescreening responses are honest but most study participants are impostors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 500–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Densten, I. L. (2005). The relationship between visioning behaviours of leaders and follower burnout. British Journal of Management, 16, 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir, T., Kass, N., & Shamir, B. (2004). The emotional bond: Vision and organizational commitment among high-tech employees. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 126–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farh, C. I., & Chen, Z. (2014). Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1074–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Brouer, R. L., Buckley, M. R., & Harvey, M. G. (2007). Strategic bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiset, J., & Boies, K. (in press). Positively vivid visions: Making followers feel capable and happy. Human Relations. doi:10.1177/0018726718810105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzáles-Morales, M. G., Kernan, M. C., Becker, T. E., & Eisenberger, R. (2018). Defeating abusive supervision: Training supervisors to support subordinates. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23, 151–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graso, M., & Probst, T. M. (2012). The effect of consideration of future consequences on quality and quantity aspects of job performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1335–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 252–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J. (1998). Appendix: Measures and assessments for the charismatic leadership approach: Scales, latent constructs, loadings, Cronbach alphas, and interclass correlations. In F. Danserau & F. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple level approaches contemporary and alternative ( Part B, Vol. 24, pp. 23–30). London, UK: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Frost, P. J. (1989). A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 243–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1, 85–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kiewitz, C., Restubog, S. L. D., Shoss, M. K., Garcia, P. R. J. M., & Tang, R. L. (2016). Suffering in silence: Investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 713–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. Y., Atwater, L., Latheef, Z., & Zheng, D. (2018). Three motives for abusive supervision: The mitigating effect of subordinates attributed motives on abusive supervision’s negative outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. doi: 10.1177/1548051818781816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Yun, S., & Srivastava, A. (2013). Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 724–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1187–1212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43, 1940–1965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Sikora, D., & Douglas, S. C. (2011). Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 751–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1040–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Teed, M. (2011). Inconsistent style of leadership as a predictor of safety behavior. Work and Stress, 25, 41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemanich, L. A., & Keller, R. T. (2007). Transformational leadership in an acquisition: A field study of employees. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J. K., & Farh, C. I. C. (2017). An emotional process theory of how subordinates appraise, experience, and respond to abusive supervision over time. Academy of Management Review, 42, 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology., 85, 879–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Folger, R. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1513–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. A., & Boies, K. (2016). Different ways to get the job done: Comparing the effects of intellectual stimulation and contingent reward leadership on task-related outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 336–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidani, Y. M. (1993). Perceptions of charisma: The influence of leader attributes, leader speech, and follower self-esteem. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University, MS: The University of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, D., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse, B. (2010). Focusing on followers: The role of regulatory focus and possible selves in visionary leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 457–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, B. (2013). The everything store: Jeff Bezos and the age of Amazon. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Breaux-Soignet, D. M. (2011). Abusive supervision as political activity: Distinguishing impulsive and strategic expressions of downward hostility. In G. Ferris & D. Treadway (Eds.), Politics in organizations: Theory and research considerations (pp. 191–212). London, UK: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2008). Emotion in conflict and negotiation: Introducing the emotions as social information (EASI) model. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to emotion in organizations (pp. 392–404). London, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2016). The interpersonal dynamics of emotion: Toward an integrative theory of emotions as social information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A. (2017). Emotions as agents of social influence: Insights from Emotions as Social Information (EASI) theory. In S. G. Harkins, K. D. Williams, & J. Burger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social influence (pp. 237–255). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., Anastasopoulou, C., & Nijstad, B. A. (2010). Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1042–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 562–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Woerkom, M., & van Engen, M. L. (2009). Learning from conflicts? The relations between task and relationship conflicts, team learning and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 381–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Restubog, S., Shao, B., Lu, V., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2018). Does anger expression help or harm leader effectiveness? The role of competence-based versus integrity-based violations and abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1050–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 531–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). The nature of organizational leadership: An introduction. In S. J. Zaccaro & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders (pp. 3–41). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Kwan, H. K., Zhang, X., & Wu, L. Z. (2014). High core self-evaluators maintain creativity: A motivational model of abusive supervision. Journal of Management, 40, 1151–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar