1,126
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Why do we act as old as we feel? The role of occupational future time perspective and core self-evaluations in the relationship between subjective age and job crafting behaviour

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 831-844 | Received 01 Mar 2019, Accepted 13 Sep 2019, Published online: 19 Oct 2019

References

  • Akkermans, J., De Lange, A. H., Van der Heijden, B. I., Kooij, D. T. A. M., Jansen, P. G. W., & Dikkers, J. S. (2016). What about time? Examining chronological and subjective age and their relation to work motivation. Career Development International, 21(4), 419–439.
  • Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Petery, G. A. (2018). The moderating role of employment status and gender on relationships between psychological age and health: A two-wave cross-lagged panel analysis of data from the health and retirement study. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(1), 79–95.
  • Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Piotrowski, M. J. (1989). Workers’ perceptions of discrepancies between chronological age and personal age: You’re only as old as you feel. Psychology and Aging, 4(3), 376–377.
  • Bohlmann, C., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2018). Methodological recommendations to move research on work and aging forward. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(3), 225–237.
  • Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913–1915.
  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.
  • Chang, C. H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 81–128.
  • Cleveland, J. N., & Shore, L. M. (1992). Self- and supervisory perspectives on age and work attitudes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 469–484.
  • Cuddy, A. J., & Fiske, S. T. (2002). Doddering, but dear: Process, content, and function in stereotyping of elderly people. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism (pp. pp. 3–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Demerouti, E. (2014). Design your own job through job crafting. European Psychologist, 19, 237–247.
  • Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C., & van der Heijden, B. I. (2012). Work–Family interface from a life and career stage perspective: The role of demands and resources. International Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 241–258.
  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613.
  • Elfering, A., Keller, A. C., Berset, M., Meier, L. L., Grebner, S., Kälin, W., … Semmer, N. K. (2016). Taking the chance: Core self-evaluations predict relative gain in job resources following turnover. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1702.
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83.
  • Gielnik, M. M., Zacher, H., & Wang, M. (2018). Age in the entrepreneurial process: The role of future time perspective and prior entrepreneurial experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(10), 1067–1085.
  • Goecke, T. F. E., & Kunze, F. (2018). The contextual role of subjective age in the chronological age/absenteeism relationship in blue and white collar teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(4), 520–534.
  • Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304.
  • Heckhausen, J., Schulz, R., & Wrosch, C. (1998). Developmental regulation in adulthood: Optimization in primary and secondary control – A multiscale questionnaire (OPS scales). Berlin, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.
  • Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32–60.
  • Judge, T. A. (2009). Core self-evaluations and work success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 58–62.
  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693–710.
  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The Core Self-Evaluations Scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.
  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.
  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17–34.
  • Kastenbaum, R., Derbin, V., Sabatini, P., & Artt, S. (1972). “The ages of me”: Toward personal and interpersonal definitions of functional aging. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 3(2), 197–211.
  • Köhler, T., & Cortina, J. M. (2019). Play it again, Sam! An analysis of constructive replication in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206319843985
  • Kooij, D. T. A. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2008). Older workers’ motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(4), 364–394.
  • Kooij, D. T. A. M., Tims, M., & Akkermans, J. (2017). The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: The role of job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 4–15.
  • Kooij, D. T. A. M., van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., Dorenbosch, L., & Denissen, J. J. (2017). Job crafting towards strengths and interests: The effects of a job crafting intervention on person–Job fit and the role of age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 971–981.
  • Kooij, D. T. A. M., Zacher, H., Wang, M., & Heckhausen, J. (2019). Successful aging at work: A process model to guide future research and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
  • Kotter-Grühn, D., Kornadt, A. E., & Stephan, Y. (2015). Looking beyond chronological age: Current knowledge and future directions in the study of subjective age. Gerontology, 62(1), 86–93.
  • Kunze, F., Raes, A. M., & Bruch, H. (2015). It matters how old you feel: Antecedents and performance consequences of average relative subjective age in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1511–1526.
  • Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139.
  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173.
  • Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70(3), 151–159.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181.
  • Marcus, J., Fritzsche, B. A., & Ng, Y. (2019). “Being” older and “feeling” older: On the interactive effects of objective and subjective age on work outcomes. Work, Aging and Retirement. doi:10.1093/workar/waz015
  • Montepare, J. M., & Lachman, M. E. (1989). “You’re only as old as you feel”: Self-perceptions of age, fears of aging, and life satisfaction from adolescence to old age. Psychology and Aging, 4(1), 73–78.
  • Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
  • Nagy, N., Fasbender, U., & North, M. S. (2019). Youthfuls, matures, and veterans: Subtyping subjective age in late career employees. Work, Aging and Retirement.
  • Nagy, N., Johnston, C. S., & Hirschi, A. (2019). Do we act as old as we feel? An examination of subjective age and job crafting behaviour of late career employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 373–383.
  • Nelson, E. A., & Dannefer, D. (1992). Aged heterogeneity: Fact or fiction? The fate of diversity in gerontological research. The Gerontologist, 32(1), 17–23.
  • North, M. S., & Shakeri, A. (2019). Understanding subjective age multidimensionality via underlying work domains: Generation, age, tenure, experience (GATE). Work, Aging and Retirement.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendation on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
  • Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158–188.
  • Rubin, D. C., & Berntsen, D. (2006). People over forty feel 20% younger than their age: Subjective age across the lifespan. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 776–780.
  • Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138.
  • Rudolph, C. W., Kooij, D. T. A. M., Rauvola, R. S., & Zacher, H. (2018). Occupational future time perspective: A meta-analysis of antencedents and outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 229–248.
  • Rudolph, C. W., Kunze, F., & Zacher, H. (2019). Getting objective about subjective age: Introduction to a special issue. Work, Aging and Retirement.
  • Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51(7), 702–714.
  • Settersten, R. A., & Mayer, K. U. (1997). The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 233–261.
  • Shane, J., Hamm, J. M., & Heckhausen, J. (2019). Subjective age at work: Feeling younger or older than one’s actual age predicts perceived control and motivation at work. Work, Aging and Retirement.
  • Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 529–537.
  • Stephan, Y., Chalabaev, A., Kotter-Grühn, D., & Jaconelli, A. (2013). “Feeling younger, being stronger”: An experimental study of subjective age and physical functioning among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(1), 1–7.
  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173–186.
  • Van Den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Peeters, M. C. (2015). The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(3), 511–532.
  • Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.
  • Weiss, D., & Freund, A. (2012). Still young at heart: Negative age-related information motivates distancing from same-aged people. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 173–180.
  • Weiss, D., & Lang, F. R. (2012). “They” are old but “I” feel younger: Age-group dissociation as a self-protective strategy in old age. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 153–163.
  • Weiss, D., & Weiss, M. (2019). Why people feel younger: Motivational and social-cognitive mechanisms of the subjective age bias and its implications for work and organizations. Work, Aging and Retirement.
  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.
  • Zacher, H. (2014a). Career adaptability predicts subjective career success above and beyond personality traits and core self-evaluations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 21–30.
  • Zacher, H. (2014b). Individual difference predictors of change in career adaptability over time. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(2), 188–198.
  • Zacher, H. (2015). Successful aging at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(1), 4–25.
  • Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 487–493.
  • Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 291–318.
  • Zacher, H., & Kooij, D. T. A. M. (2017). Aging and proactivity. In S. K. Parker & U. K. Bindl (Eds.), Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations (pp. 258–294). New York: Routledge.
  • Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2019). Just a mirage: On the incremental predictive validity of subjective age. Work, Aging and Retirement, 5(2), 141–162.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.