Does playful work design ‘lead to’ more creativity? A diary study on the role of flow

References

• Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., & Rönkkö, M. (2021). On ignoring the random effects assumption in multilevel models: Review, critique, and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 24(2), 443–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119877457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Van Woerkom, M. (2017). Flow at work: A self-determination perspective. Occupational Health Science, 1(1–2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-017-0003-3
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., Espevik, R., & De Vries, J. D. (2020). Job crafting and playful work design: Links with performance during busy and quiet days. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 122, 103478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Scharp, Y., Breevaart, K., & De Vries, J. (2020). Playful work design: Introduction of a new concept. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23, E19. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Petrou, P., Op den Kamp, E. M., & Tims, M. (2020). Proactive vitality management, work engagement, and creativity: The role of goal orientation. Applied Psychology, 69(2), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, L. A. (2007). The nature of playfulness in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, P., Bateson, P. G., & Martin, P. (2013). Play, playfulness, creativity and innovation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play, and games. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Judith, L. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60–97.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Hachette UK.
   Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Sonnentag, S., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Work‐related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., & Rispens, S. (2014). Improving the image of student‐recruited samples: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dippo, C. (2013). Evaluating the alternative uses test of creativity. National Conference On Undergraduate Research (NCUR), 427–434.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, G. (2020). Guilford’s alternative uses task. Indiana University Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Espedido, A., & Searle, B. J. (2020). Daily proactive problem-solving and next day stress appraisals: The moderating role of behavioral activation. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 33(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1751828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina, L. S. A., Rodrigues, G. D. R., & Hutz, C. S. (2018). Flow and engagement at work: A literature review. Psico-USF, 23(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712018230404
   Google Scholar
• Fluegge-Woolf, E. R. (2014). Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance. Management Research Review, 37(8), 682–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2012-0252
   Google Scholar
• Fong, C. J., Zaleski, D. J., & Leach, J. K. (2015). The challenge–skill balance and antecedents of flow: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.967799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. S., Förster, J., & Denzler, M. (2007). Interactive effects of mood and task framing on creative generation. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerpott, F. H., Rivkin, W., & Unger, D. (2022). Stop and go, where is my flow? How and when daily aversive morning commutes are negatively related to employees’ motivational states and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, M. H. (2021). Composite reliability of multilevel data: It’s about observed scores and construct meanings. Psychological Methods, 26(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The experience sampling method. flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_2
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Lovatt, P. J. (2013). Breaking away from set patterns of thinking: Improvisation and divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, L. M., Nelson, D. L., Wallace, J. C., & Johnson, P. D. (2011). Integrating attachment style, vigor at work, and extra‐role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 464–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, H. P., & Patterson, M. G. (2018). Affect and creativity. In Roni Reiter-Palmon, V. L. Kennel, J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace (pp. 245–265). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00011-5
   Google Scholar
• Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneta, G. B. (2004). The flow model of intrinsic motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035916.27782.e4
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. Eighth Edi.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K., & Cleal, B. (2010). Predicting flow at work: Investigating the activities and job characteristics that predict flow states at work. Joural of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerlemans, W. G. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Motivating job characteristics and happiness at work: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(11), 1230–1241. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petelczyc, C. A., Capezio, A., Wang, L., Restubog, S. L. D., & Aquino, K. (2018). Play at work: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 44(1), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317731519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, Y. S., Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & van der Linden, D. (2019). Daily playful work design: A trait activation perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 82, 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, Y. S., Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Using playful work design to deal with hindrance job demands: A quantitative diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, Y. S., Bakker, A. B., Breevaart, K., Kruup, K., & Uusberg, A. (2022). Playful work design: Conceptualization, measurement, and validity. Human Relations . https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211070996
   Google Scholar
• Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2020). Connections between curiosity, flow and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109555
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., & Kwapil Silvia, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. B. (2013). Looking for a lesson in Google’s perks. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, D. C., Fung, H. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2018). Teamwork and flow proneness mitigate the negative effect of excess challenge on flow state. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, D. C., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2021). Living well by “flowing’well: The indirect effect of autotelic personality on well-being through flow experience. Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1716055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullén, F., de Manzano, Ö., Almeida, R., Magnusson, P. K. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Madison, G. (2012). Proneness for psychological flow in everyday life: Associations with personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, D., Taris, T. W., Beckers, D. G. J., & Kindt, K. B. (2007). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and occupational health: BAS and BIS on the job. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(6), 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubair, A., & Kamal, A. (2015). Authentic leadership and creativity: Mediating role of work-related flow and psychological capital. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 25(1), 150–171.
   Google Scholar