Can employees capitalize upon their role breadth self-efficacy and innovative work behaviour to enhance their prospects of promotion?

References

• Abele, A. E., & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandri, G., Cortina, J. M., Sheng, Z., & Borgogni, L. (2021). Where you came from and where you are going: The role of performance trajectory in promotion decisions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(4), 599–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., Bledow, R., Hülsheger, U., & Rosing, K. (2018). Innovation and creativity in organizations. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology: Managerial psychology and organizational approaches (Vol. 3, pp. 161–186). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914964.n9
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state‐of‐the‐science review and prospective commentary. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryee, S., & Chu, C. W. L. (2012). Antecedents and outcomes of challenging job experiences: A social cognitive perspective. Human Performance, 25(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.684082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal control and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1–45). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.003
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Y. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. (2016). Multilevel modelling in R (2.6). A brief introduction to R, the multilevel package and the nlme package[Online manual]. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Bliese_Multilevel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. (2022). Package ‘multilevel’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/multilevel/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1&2), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/258353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687–732). Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P. (2012). Behavior, performance, and effectiveness in the twenty-first century. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 159–194). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P., Glaser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations (pp. 258–299). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. H., Mai, X., Kuok, O. M., & Kong, S. H. (2016). The influence of satisfaction and promotability on the relation between career adaptability and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Farh, J. -L., Campbell-Bush, E. M., Wu, Z., & Wu, X. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, J. A., & Fulmer, R. M. (2003). Developing your leadership pipeline. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. (2017). Proactive personality: A twenty-year review. In S. K. Parker & U. K. Bindl (Eds.), Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations (pp. 193–225). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Pater, I. E., Van Vianen, A. E. M., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Klehe, U. -C. (2009). Employees’ challenging job experiences and supervisors’ evaluations of promotability. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01139.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devloo, T., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., & Feys, M. (2016). When the fire dies: Perceived success and support for innovation shape the motivating potential of innovative work behavior. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1182157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devloo, T., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., & Salanova, M. (2015). Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.931326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, A., De Hauw, S., & van der Heidjen, B. I. (2011). Competency development and career success: The mediating role of employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugate, M., Van der Heijden, B., De Vos, A., Forrier, A., & De Cuyper, N. (2021). Is what’s past prologue? A review and agenda for contemporary employability research. The Academy of Management Annals, 15. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0171
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. B., Jr., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2012). Bridge building within the province of proactivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, W. A., Gilmore, D. C., Shuffler, M. L., & Leslie, J. B. (2012). Political skill as an indicator of promotability among multiple rater sources. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-15584-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/256352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbuz, S., Habiboglu, O. S., & Bingol, D. (2016). Who is being judged promotable: Good actors, high performers, highly committed or birds of a feather? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Ed).Cengage Learning. (8th
   Google Scholar
• Hao, P., He, W., & Long, L. -R. (2018). Why and when empowering leadership has different effects on employee work performance: The pivotal roles of passion for work and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817707517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. H., & Wagner, D. T. (2016). Spilling outside the box: The effects of individuals’ creative behaviors at work on time spent with their spouses at home. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 841–859. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, A., & Jaensch, V. (2015). Narcissism and career success: Occupational self-efficacy and career engagement as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 205–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. -T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job dissatisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahar, I. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A longitudinal investigation of task and contextual performance influences on promotability judgments. Human Performance, 24(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.580806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 169–211). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelloway, E. K. (2015). Using mplus for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models. Journal of Vocational Behavior Article 103316, 115, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letwin, C., Wo, D., Folger, R., Rice, D., Taylor, R., Richard, B., & Taylor, S. (2016). The “right” and the “good” in ethical leadership: Implications for supervisors’ performance and promotability evaluations. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(4), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2747-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 15, pp. 47–119). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Liang, J., & Farh, J. L. (2020). Speaking up when water is Murky: An uncertainty based model linking perceived organizational politics to employee voice. Journal of Management, 46(3), 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318798025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., Li, F., Chen, T., & Crant, M. J. (2022). Proactive personality and promotability: Mediating roles of promotive and prohibitive voice and moderating roles of organizational politics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Business Research, 145, 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, M., & Stumpf, S. A. (1983). Effects of candidate characteristics on management promotion decisions: An experimental study. Personnel Psychology, 36(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb01435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, C. D., Ohlott, P. J., & Ruderman, M. N. (1999). Job challenge profile. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Nevicka, B., & Sedikides, C. (2021). Employee narcissism and promotability prospects. Journal of Personality, 89(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success. A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social–cognitive theory perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., & Wang, M. (2019). An actor–partner interdependence model of employees’ and coworkers’ innovative behavior, psychological detachment, and strain reactions. Personnel Psychology, 72(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). Challenging the status quo: What motivates proactive behaviour? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907X180360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, K., Cheng, B. H., Lam, W., & Parker, S. K. (2019). Enjoy your evening, be proactive tomorrow: How off-job experiences shape daily proactivity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(8), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Wang, Y., & Liao, J. (2019). When is proactivity wise? A review of factors that influence the individual outcomes of proactive behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Lee, J. Y. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswami, A., Dreher, G. F., Bretz, R., & Wiethoff, C. (2010). Gender, mentoring, and career success: The importance of organizational context. Personnel Psychology, 63(2), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh, S. C., Zhang, X. ‐., Morgeson, F. P., Tian, P., & van Dick, R. (2018). Are you really doing good things in your boss’s eyes? Interactive effects of employee innovative work behavior and leader–member exchange on supervisory performance ratings. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Sargent, L. D., Kraimer, M. L., & Kiazad, K. (2017). Linking developmental experiences to leader effectiveness and promotability: The mediating role of leadership self‐efficacy and mentor network. Personnel Psychology, 70(2), 357–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2016). When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., & Spychala, A. (2012). Job control and job stressors as predictors of proactive work behavior: Is role breadth self-efficacy the link? Human Performance, 25(5), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.721830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., & Dries, N. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of objective versus subjective career success: Competing perspectives and future directions. Journal of Management, 45(1), 35–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318786563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. E., & Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1542–1571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Rmediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & Thoemmes, F. (2014). Single-level and multilevel mediation analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Harten, J., De Cuyper, N., Knies, E., & Forrier, A. (2021). Taking the temperature of employability research: A systematic review of interrelationships across and within conceptual strands. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1942847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vianen, E. M., De Pater, I. E., & Preenen, P. T. (2020). Career success: Employability and the quality of work experiences. In J. Athanasou & H. Perera (Eds.), International Handbook of Career Guidance (pp. 241–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25153-6_11
   Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A., Mustafa, M. J., Anderson, N., & Sayer, B. (2018). Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2017-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. -H., & Parker, S. K. (2017). The role of leader support in facilitating proactive work behavior: A perspective from attachment theory. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1025–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314544745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Chow, C. W. C. Does taking charge help or harm employees’ promotability and visibility? An investigation from supervisors’ status perspective. (2022). The Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(1), 53–71. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigler, C., & Ye, F. A comparison of multilevel mediation modeling methods: Recommendations for applied researchers. (2019). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(3), 338–359. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1527676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar