Can communal work activities reduce supervisors’ state grandiose narcissism? A 10-day experience sampling study

References

• Abrahams, L., Vergauwe, J., & De Fruyt, F. (in press). Within-person personality variability in the work context: A blessing or a curse for job performance? Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic personality inventory really measure? Assessment, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110382845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand Mcnally.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, and extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology: The self (pp. 115–138). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818572
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S., Meyer, R. D., Patrick Bradshaw, R., Green, J. P., Kelly, E. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). Personality strength and situational influences on behavior: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314557524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). The curvilinear relationship between state neuroticism and momentary task performance. PLos One, 9(9), e106989. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0106989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2016). From state neuroticism to momentary task performance: A person × situation approach. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 25(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.983085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edershile, E. A., Woods, W. C., Sharpe, B. M., Crowe, M., Miller, J. D., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). A day in the life of narcissus: Measuring narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability in daily life. Psychological Assessment, 31(7), 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edershile, E. A., & Wright, A. G. C. (2020). Fluctuations in grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic states: A momentary perspective. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 120(5), 1386–1414. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, B. M., Waldman, D. A., & Balthazard, P. (2010). Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 103(5), 854–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2014). Down-regulating narcissistic tendencies: Communal focus reduces state narcissism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(4), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213516635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2016). The wax and wane of narcissism: Grandiose narcissism as a process or state. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grijalva, E., & Newman, D. A. (2015). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta-analysis and consideration of collectivist culture, big five personality, and narcissism’s facet structure. Applied Psychology, 64(1), 93–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/APPS.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Dynamic structural equation modeling as a combination of time series modeling, multilevel modeling, and structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), The Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd, ed). Guilford Press. https://ellenhamaker.github.io/DSEM-book-chapter/
   Google Scholar
• Helfrich, H., & Dietl, E. (2019). Is employee narcissism always toxic? – the role of narcissistic admiration, rivalry and leaders’ implicit followership theories for employee voice. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 28(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1575365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational Behavior: Utilizing human resources. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Heyde, F., Wille, B., Kuijpers, E., Vergauwe, J., & Hofmans, J. (2023). Translating trait to state assessment: The case of grandiose narcissism. PLos One, 18 (5), e0284649. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0284649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 30, pp. 55–89). University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. L., & Ryan, A. M. (2011). Beyond personality traits: A study of personality states and situational contingencies in customer service jobs. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 451–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-6570.2011.01216.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayawickreme, E., Fleeson, W., Beck, E. D., Baumert, A., Adler, J. M., & Perugini, M. (2021). Personality dynamics. Personality Science, 2, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5964/PS.6179
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality & Individual Differences, 51(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, E., Pickett, J., Wille, B., & Hofmans, J. (2022). Do you feel better when you behave more extraverted than you are? The relationship between cumulative counterdispositional extraversion and positive feelings. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(4), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211015062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Grimaldi, E. M. (2018). The Dark Triad and workplace behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology & Organizational Behavior, 5, 387–414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451
   Google Scholar
• Li, W. D., Li, S., Feng, J., Wang, M., Zhang, H., Frese, M., & Wu, C. H. (2021). Can becoming a leader change your personality? An investigation with two longitudinal studies from a role-based perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6), 882–901. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychological Methods, 25(5), 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/MET0000250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Morin, A. J. S. (2016). A person-centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 584–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.2085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minbashian, A., Wood, R. E., & Beckmann, N. (2010). Task-contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0020016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. (2009). From personality and assessment (1968) to personality science, 2009. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRP.2008.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K. (2005, May 2). EFA in CFA framework using dichotomous variables. Statmodel. http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/9/64.html?1337623838
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K. (2018). Mplus Users Guide (Eight ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohly, S., & Schmitt, A. (2015). What makes us enthusiastic, angry, feeling at rest or worried? Development and validation of an affective work events taxonomy using concept mapping methodology. Journal of Business & Psychology, 30(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9328-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., Doerr, B., & Chatman, J. A. (2018). “See you in court”: How CEO narcissism increases firms’ vulnerability to lawsuits. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(5), 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, N. P., Spoelma, T. M., Chawla, N., & Gabriel, A. S. (2019). What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 727–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/APL0000374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redeker, M., de Vries, R. E., Rouckhout, D., Vermeren, P., & de Fruyt, F. (2014). Integrating leadership: The leadership circumplex. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.738671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. R. (2021). Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Northwestern University. R. package version 2.1.9. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2015). Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., Bel-Bahar, T., & Fernandez, C. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situation variables. Journal of Personality, 75(3), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6494.2007.00446.X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultzberg, M., & Muthén, B. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1392862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Laake, P. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosnowska, J., Hofmans, J., Rauthmann, J., & Wille, B. (2021). Personality is dynamic and it matters: The role of personality dynamics in applied contexts. European Journal of Personality, 35(4), 418–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211022491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & Lebreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(SUPPL.1), S41–S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1006/JRPE.2000.2292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., Toich, M. J., & Ozkum, S. B. (2021). Trait Activation Theory: A review of the literature and applications to five lines of personality dynamics research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology & Organizational Behavior, 8, 199–233. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012420-062228
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher, G. R., Biermeier-Hanson, B., Dickson, M. W., & Wang, M. (2019). Getting old at the top: The role of agentic and communal orientations in the relationship between age and follower perceptions of leadership behaviors and outcomes. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/WORKAR/WAZ012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82(5), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In D. Ciccetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, B., Hofmans, J., Lievens, F., Back, M. D., & De Fruyt, F. (2019). Climbing the corporate ladder and within-person changes in narcissism: Reciprocal relationships over two decades. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61(4), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. E., Beckmann, N., Birney, D. P., Beckmann, J. F., Minbashian, A., & Chau, R. (2019). Situation contingent units of personality at work. Personality & Individual Differences, 136, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2018.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A., Lievens, F., De Fruyt, F., & Wille, B. (2013). Personality across working life: The longitudinal and reciprocal influences of personality on work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(SUPPL 1), S7–S25. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1863
   Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A., Wille, B., Wu, C., Lievens, F., & De Fruyt, F. (2019). The influence of work on personality trait development: The Demands-Affordances TrAnsactional (DATA) model, an integrative review, and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316652279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar