The virtuous cycle of prosocial behaviour and perceived prosocial impact in organizations: a longitudinal three-wave study

References

• Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Whillans, A. V., Grant, A. M., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Making a difference matters: Impact unlocks the emotional benefits of prosocial spending. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T. D. (2006). Rewarding good citizens: The relationship between citizenship behavior, gender, and organizational rewards 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., Harvey, J., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). Organizational behavior and human decision processes: A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., & Podsakoff, N. (2018). The unintended consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors for employees, teams, and organizations. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Citizenship Behavior, 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, N. C., Berry, C. M., & Houston, L. (2014). A meta‐analytic comparison of self-reported and other‐reported organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanheira, F. (2016). Perceived social impact, social worth, and job performance: Mediation by motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S.(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo, A. (2011). Role perceptions and motivations to perform organizational citizenship behaviors. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 48, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, W. H. (2020). Using fit statistic differences to determine the optimal number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2008). Employees without a cause: The motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2012). Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor: Are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612439424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Outsourcing inspiration: The performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A., & Mayer, D. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). Doing good buffers against feeling bad: Prosocial impact compensates for negative task and self-evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader–member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1979). Statistical models and methods for analysis of longitudinal data. In K. G. Jöreskog & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models (pp. 129–169). Abt. Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W., Bradburn, J., Johnson, R. E., Lin, S.-H., & Chang, C.-H. (2019). The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: A daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine, G. J., Parsons, C. K., & Kansara, S. (2015). Above and beyond, again and again: Self-regulation in the aftermath of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Chen, X.-P., & Holley, E. (2017). Help yourself by helping others: The joint impact of group member organizational citizenship behaviors and group cohesiveness on group member objective task performance change. Personnel Psychology, 70(4), 809–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martela, F., Gómez, M., Unanue, W., Araya, S., Bravo, D., & Espejo, A. (2021). What makes work meaningful? Longitudinal evidence for the importance of autonomy and beneficence for meaningful work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martela, F., & Riekki, T. J. J. (2018). Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and Beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 40(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9552-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J., Kamdar, D., Morrison, E. W., & Turban, D. B. (2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Organ, D. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes performance hypothesis. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/257604
   Google Scholar
• Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual and organizational level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306–1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement. A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 10–24). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M.(2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E.(1996). The Maslach Burnout Inventory — General Survey. In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (3rd ed). Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2015). The field of prosocial behavior: An introduction and overview. The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.32
   Google Scholar
• Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., & Gunz, A.(2009). Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1467–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., & Grant, A. M. (2012). Doing good at work feels good at home, but not right away: When and why perceived prosocial impact predicts positive affect. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 495–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaakobi, E., & Weisberg, J. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior predicts quality, creativity, and efficiency performance: The roles of occupational and collective efficacies. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 758. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler, I. (2022). A glimpse into prosociality at work. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar