Intensifying and protective? – how organizational culture shapes the effect of work scheduling autonomy on the relationship between time pressure and self-endangering work behaviours

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerstedt, T., Fredlund, P., Gillberg, M., & Jansson, B. (2002). Work load and work hours in relation to disturbed sleep and fatigue in a large representative sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53(1), 585–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00447-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1957). An experimental investigation of group influence. In Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Eds.),Symposium on preventive and social psychiatry (pp. 15–17). U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Baeriswyl, S., Bratoljic, C., & Krause, A. (2021). How homeroom teachers cope with high demands: Effect of prolonging working hours on emotional exhaustion. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethge, A., Deci, N., Dettmers, J., & Rigotti, T. (2019). “Some days won’t end ever”: Working faster and longer as a boundary condition for challenge versus hindrance effects of time pressure. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(3), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethge, A., Menhardt, A.-K., Frontzkowski, Y., & Schilbach, M. (2024). Two sides of the same coin: Motivating and demotivating mediation paths of time pressure and their relationship with strain. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 37(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2183389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethge, A., Vahle-Hinz, T., Schulte-Braucks, J., & van Dick, R. (2018). A matter of time? Challenging and hindering effects of time pressure on work engagement. Work & Stress, 32(3), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1415998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands – resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life (12th print ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2022). Multilevel modeling in R (2.7). A brief introduction to R, the multilevel package and the nlme package. In Significance. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Bliese_Multilevel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442802237116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbio, A., Canova, L., & Manganelli, A. M. (2022). Organizational work-home culture and its relations with the work–family interface and employees’ subjective well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(5), 2933–2966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10048-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañibano, A. (2019). Workplace flexibility as a paradoxical phenomenon: Exploring employee experiences. Human Relations, 72(2), 444–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718769716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, A., & Kaluza, G. (2015). Psychosozialer Stress Am Arbeitsplatz: Indirekte Unternehmenssteuerung, selbstgefährdendes Verhalten Und Die Folgen für Die Gesundheit. Gesundheitsmonitor. Retrieved from https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Projekte/17_Gesundheitsmonitor/Newsletter_Gesundheitsmonitor_selbstgefaehrdendes_Verhalten_20150316.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. E., & Staines, G. L. (1990). Flextime - a viable solution to work/family conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 11(4), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251390011004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., & van der Horst, M. (2020). Flexible working and unpaid overtime in the UK: The role of gender, parental and occupational status. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bloom, J., Syrek, C. J., Kühnel, J., & Vahle-Hinz, T. (2022). Unlimited paid time off policies: Unlocking the best and unleashing the beast. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(March), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812187
   Google Scholar
• Deci, N., Dettmers, J., Krause, A., & Berset, M. (2016). Coping in flexible working conditions - Engagement, disengagement and self-endangering strategies. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 9(2), 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., & Rispens, S. (2014). Improving the image of student-recruited samples: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmers, J., & Bredehöft, F. (2020). The ambivalence of job autonomy and the role of job design demands. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.16993/SJWOP.81
   Google Scholar
• Dettmers, J., Deci, N., Baeriswyl, S., Berset, M., & Krause, A. (2016). Self-endangering work behavior. In M. Wiencke, S. Fischer, & M. Cacace (Eds.), Healthy at work – interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 33–51). Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dikkers, J. S. E., Geurts, S. A. E., Dulk, L. D., Peper, B., Taris, T. W., & Kompier, M. A. J. (2007). Dimensions of work-home culture and their relations with the use of work-home arrangements and work-home interaction. Work & Stress, 21(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370701442190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, R., Wu, H., Ni, S., & Lu, T. (2021). The nonlinear consequences of working hours for job satisfaction: The moderating role of job autonomy. Current Psychology, 42(14), 11849–11870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02463-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drescher, M. A., Audrey Korsgaard, M., Welpe, I. M., Picot, A., & Wigand, R. T. (2014). The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, F. (2015). Is work intensification extra stress? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusser, J. A., Mojzisch, A., Niesel, M., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Ten Years on: A review of recent research on the job demand–control (-support) model and psychological well-being. Work & Stress, 24(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678371003683747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höge, T. (2011). Perceived flexibility requirements at work and the entreployee-work-orientation: Concept and measurement. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 4(1), 3–21. http://www.uibk.ac.at/psychologie/mitarbeiter/hoege/hoege_jpah.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, A., Lopper, E., Prestele, E., Milius, M., Nitz, S., Gahrmann, C., & Reis, D. (2023). Extending and intensifying work as mediators in the relationship between weekly time pressure and fatigue: The moderating role of perfectionism. International Journal of Stress Management, 30(3), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clock work of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and at home. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307305489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kern, M., Semmer, N. K., & Baethge, A. (2023). Energized or distressed by time pressure? The role of time pressure illegitimacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(4), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2198708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S., Geurts, S., & Dikkers, J. (2005). Work-family culture in organizations: Theoretical and empirical approaches. In S. A. Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family: An international perspective (pp. 87–120). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, A., Baeriswyl, S., Berset, M., Deci, N., Dettmers, J., Dorsemagen, C., Meier, W., Schraner, S., Stetter, B., & Straub, L. (2015). Selbstgefährdung als indikator für mängel bei der Gestaltung mobil-flexibler Arbeit: Zur Entwicklung eines Erhebungsinstruments. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 17(1), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, B., Korunka, C., & Tement, S. (2014). Too much job control? Two studies on curvilinear relations between job control and eldercare workers’ well-being. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(12), 1644–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Bunner, J. (2017). The bright and dark sides of job autonomy. In C. Korunka & B. Kubicek (Eds.), Job demands in a changing world of work (pp. 45–64). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54678-0_4
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Smithson, J. (2001). Sense of entitlement to support for the reconciliation of employment and family life. Human Relations, 54(11), 1455–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267015411003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott, Y. (2020). Does flexibility help employees switch off from work? Flexible working-time arrangements and cognitive work-to-home spillover for women and men in Germany. Social Indicator Research, 151(2), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2031-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, R., & Antoni, C. H. (2023). Work Overload and Self-Endangering Work Behavior. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 67(3), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. A. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl, M. R., & Conner, T. S. (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, P., Kelly, E. L., Fan, W., Lee, S. R., Almeida, D., Kossek, E. E., & Buxton, O. M. (2016). Does a flexibility/support organizational initiative improve high-tech employees’ well-being? Evidence from the work, family, and health network. American Sociological Review, 81(1), 134–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415622391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786541
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mülder, L. M., Deci, N., Werner, A. M., Reichel, J. L., Tibubos, A. N., Heller, S., Schäfer, M., Pfirrmann, D., Edelmann, D., Dietz, P., Beutel, M. E., Letzel, S., & Rigotti, T., (2021). Antecedents and moderation effects of maladaptive coping behaviors among German university students. Frontiers in Psycholology, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafic, M., Dorsemagen, C., Baeriswyl, S., Knecht, M., & Krause, A. (2023). Wie gefährden Beschäftigte ihre Gesundheit? Evidenz für Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität des Fragebogens zur Erfassung der interessierten Selbstgefährdung (ISG). Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 67(4), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000404
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. (2001). Woher weiß ich, was ich selber will? In W. Glißmann & K. Peters (Eds.), Mehr Druck durch mehr Freiheit (pp. 99–111)). VSA-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P., den Dulk, L., & van der Lippe, T. (2009). The effects of time-spatial flexibility and new working conditions on employees’ work-life balance: The Dutch case. Community, Work and Family, 12(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800902968907
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P., Poutsma, E., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Bakker, A. B., & de Bruijn, T. (2014). Enjoying new ways to work: An HRM‐process approach to study flow. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasna, A. (2018). Scheduled to work hard: The relationship between non-standard working hours and work intensity among European workers (2005–2015). Human Resource Management Journal, 28(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., & R Core Team. (2023). Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-163. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
   Google Scholar
• Pongratz, H. J., & Voß, G. G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee. Concepts and Transformation, 8(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.04pon
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713495704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A., & Zijlstra, F. R. (2000). Work pressure. Results of a conceptual and empirical analysis. In M. Vartiainen, F. Avalone, & N. Anderson (Eds.), Innovative theories, tools, and practices in work and organizational psychology (pp. 29–46). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieman, S., & Glavin, P. (2017). Ironic flexibility: When normative role blurring undermines the benefits of schedule control. The Sociological Quarterly, 58(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2016.1246905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz, J., & Rigotti, T. (2018). How do differing degrees of working-time autonomy and overtime affect worker well-being? A multilevel approach using data from the German socio-economic panel (SOEP). German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 32(3–4), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218780630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmer, N., Zapf, D., & Dunckel, H. (1999). ISTA - Instrument zur stressbezogenen Arbeitsanalyse (Version 6.0). In H. Dunckel (Ed.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren (pp. 179–204). VdF Hochschulverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shifrin, N. V., & Michel, J. S. (2022). Flexible work arrangements and employee health: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress, 36(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1936287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017). Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1601–1635. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, S., Dick Van, R., Ullrich, J., Charalambous, J., Menzel, B., & Egold, N. (2010). Der Work design questionnaire Vorstellung und erste Validierung einer deutschen version. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 54(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000002
   Google Scholar
• Stiglbauer, B., & Kovacs, C. (2018). The more, the better? Curvilinear effects of job autonomy on well-being from vitamin model and PE-fit theory perspectives. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(4), 520–536. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, X., & Ng, S. M. (2019). Development and validation of the collective psychological ownership scale in organizational contexts. International Social Work, 62(5), 1431–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818767483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Keulemans, L. (2012). Do new ways of working foster work engagement? Psicothema, 24(1), 113–120. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22269373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Hoeven, C. L., Miller, V. D., Peper, B., & den Dulk, L. (2017). “The work must go on”: The role of employee and managerial communication in the use of work–life policies. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(2), 194–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916684980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Breeschoten, L., & Evertsson, M. (2019). When does part-time work relate to less work-life conflict for parents? Moderating influences of workplace support and gender in the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Community, Work and Family, 22(5), 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2019.1581138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lippe, T., & Lippényi, Z. (2020). Beyond formal access: Organizational context, working from home, and work–family conflict of men and women in European workplaces. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1993-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Echtelt, P., Glebbeek, A., Lewis, S., & Lindenberg, S. (2009). Post-fordist work: A man’s world? - gender and working overtime in the Netherlands. Gender & Society, 23(2), 188–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208331320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Fossen, J. A., Baker, N. M., Mack, E. A., Chang, C.-H., Cotton, S. R., & Catalano, I. (2023). The moderating effect of scheduling autonomy on smartphone use and stress among older workers. Work, Aging and Retirement, 9(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, T. D., Jackson, P. R., & Mullarkey, S. (1995). Further evidence on some new measures of job control, cognitive demand and production responsibility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(5), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, J. L., Elangovan, A. R., Hu, J., & Hrabluik, C. (2019). Charting new terrain in work design: A study of hybrid work characteristics. Applied Psychology, 68(3), 479–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar