Connecting work teams in a remote workplace: an identity leadership perspective

References

• Afuang, A., Carreon, M., & Rago, T. (2022, March 29). New IDC report reveals 56% of Asia/Pacific employees want flexible work even beyond the pandemic. IDC. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prAP48993022
   Google Scholar
• Ahrendt, D., Cabrita, J., Clerici, E., Hurley, J., Leončikas, T., Mascherini, M., & Sándor, E. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19. COVID-19 series. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S., Dolls, M., & Zarate, P. (2023). Time savings when working from home (w30866; p. w30866). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30866
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andel, S. A., Shen, W., & Arvan, M. L. (2021). Depending on your own kindness: The moderating role of self-compassion on the within-person consequences of work loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(4), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E. (2020). Identity and identification during and after the pandemic: How might COVID‐19 change the research questions we ask? Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1763–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00062-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsness, Z. I., Diekmann, K. A., & Seidel, M. D. L. (2005). Motivation and opportunity: The role of remote work, demographic dissimilarity, and social network centrality in impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel, C. A., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2007). The struggle to establish organizational membership and identification in remote work contexts. In C. A. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization (pp. 119–133). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bedeian, A. G., Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Age, tenure, and job satisfaction: A tale of two perspectives. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(92)90045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., McAlpine, K. L., & Hill, N. S. (2019). Leading from a distance: Advancements in virtual leadership research. In R. N. Landers (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior (1st ed. pp. 387–418). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649636.016
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A. L., & Allen, J. A. (2023). The entitativity underlying meetings: Meetings as key in the lifecycle of effective workgroups. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221101341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Leite, A. C. (2022). The effects of social and organizational connectedness on employee well-being and remote working experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. M. HI, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71–138). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (2010). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (pp. 329–356). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867266-22
   Google Scholar
• Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S. L., & Daly, J. A. (2004). Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co‐located teams. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 9(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280410534294
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMartino, V., & Wirth, L. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129(5), 529–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(5), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, A. J., Yammarino, F. J., & Jolson, M. A. (1994). Closeness of supervision and salesperson work outcomes: An alternate perspective. Journal of Business Research, 29(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. I. (2018). The anatomy of friendship. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken, E., Bentley, T., Shafaei, A., Farr-Wharton, B., Onnis, L., & Omari, M. (2021). Forced flexibility and remote working: Opportunities and challenges in the new normal. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(6), 1131–1149. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, K., Haslam, S. A., Steffens, N. K., Vanbeselaere, N., De Cuyper, B., & Boen, F. (2015). Believing in “us”: Exploring leaders’ capacity to enhance team confidence and performance by building a sense of shared social identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, K., McEwan, D., & Sarkar, M. (2020). The impact of identity leadership on team functioning and well-being in team sport: Is psychological safety the missing link? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 51, 101763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 63(7), e426–e432. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000002236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garretsen, H., Stoker, J. I., Soudis, D., & Wendt, H. (2022). The pandemic that shocked managers across the world: The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 101630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Voelpel, S. C., & van Vugt, M. (2019). It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: A temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 717–738. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker Martin, B., & MacDonnell, R. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta‐analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35(7), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211238820
   Google Scholar
• Harter, J. (2022, September 6). Is quiet quitting real? Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. (2020). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power (2nd ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Reutas, J., Bentley, S. V., McMillan, B., Lindfield, M., Luong, M., Peters, K., Steffens, N. K., & Lennox, C. (2023). Developing engaged and ‘teamful’ leaders: A randomized controlled trial of the 5R identity leadership program. Public Library of Science ONE, 18(5), e0286263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286263
   Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A., & Littvay, L. (2012). Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N. S., Axtell, C., Raghuram, S., & Nurmi, N. (2022). Unpacking virtual work’s dual effects on employee well-being: An integrative review and future research agenda. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221131535 50 (2) 752–792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). The dynamic, diverse, and variable faces of organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 150–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.27711645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 258–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2012.741134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniffin, K. M., Detert, J. R., & Leroy, H. L. (2020). On leading and managing: Synonyms or separate (and unequal)? Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(4), 544–571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., & van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniffin, K. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2023). Leading or managing? A dual-pathway model to influence people and run organizations. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, H., Geibel, H. V., & Otto, K. (2020). Identity leadership and well-being: Team identification and trust as underlying mechanisms. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2020-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, H., Haslam, S. A., Otto, K., & Steffens, N. K. (2021). Identity leadership, social identity continuity, and well-being at work during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L., & DeChurch, L. A. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.36.4.343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Allen, J. A. (2018). Modeling temporal interaction dynamics in organizational settings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9506-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meinecke, A. L., Rowold, J., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1017–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardelli, G. J. (2022). Lessons from a crisis. Organizational Dynamics, 51(2), 100886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., Harvey, J. L., & Hall, R. J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00081-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Epitropaki, O., Foti, R. J., & Hansbrough, T. K. (2020). Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045434
   Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. M. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K. (2016). Into the wild: Field research can increase both replicability and real-world impact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowsky, J., Jager, J., & Hemken, D. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414552301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. W., & Igbaria, M. (1998). A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research. In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 338–358). Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Mihalache, M., & Mihalache, O. R. (2022). How workplace support for the COVID ‐19 pandemic and personality traits affect changes in employees’ affective commitment to the organization and job‐related well‐being. Human Resource Management, 61(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milesi, P. (2022). Identity leadership, procedural justice, and group identification in uncertain organizational contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(9), 886–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. K., Lewis, J., Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2023). Benevolent friends and high integrity leaders: How preferences for benevolence and integrity change across relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 177, 104252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, A. J., Shaw, J. D., & Zhu, J. (2021). The people still make the (remote work-) place: Lessons from a pandemic. Journal of Management, 47(8), 1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211023563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offermann, L. R., & Coats, M. R. (2018). Implicit theories of leadership: Stability and change over two decades. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offermann, L. R., Kennedy, J. K., & Wirtz, P. W. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(94)90005-1
   Google Scholar
• Op ‘t Roodt, H., Krug, H., & Otto, K. (2021). Subgroup formation in diverse virtual teams: The moderating role of identity leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, A. M., Rizzo, C., & Pino, G. (2019). Controversial sports sponsorships: Effects of sponsor moral appropriateness and self-team connection on sponsored teams and external benefit perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 98, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitesa, M., & Gelfand, M. J. (2022). Going beyond Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) samples and problems in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104212, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104212
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvanova, R. K., & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2018). Shared social identity in leadership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Psychology and the end of history: A critique and a proposal for the psychology of social categorization. Political Psychology, 22(2), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
   Google Scholar
• Rock, K. W., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). Where do we go from here? Predicting identification among dispersed employees. In B. Moingeon & G. B. Soenen (Eds.), Corporate and organizational identities (pp. 51–71). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roubinson, B. (2022, February, 1). Remote work is here to stay and will increase into 2023, experts say. Forbs. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2022/02/01/remote-work-is-here-to-stay-and-will-increase-into-2023-experts-say/?sh=63f16d7720a6
   Google Scholar
• Sardeshmukh, S. R., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2017). Integrating moderation and mediation: A structural equation modeling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 721–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoel, C., Bluemke, M., Mueller, P., & Stahlberg, D. (2011). When autocratic leaders become an option-uncertainty and self-esteem predict implicit leadership preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E., Rosen, C. C., Richardson, H. A., Williams, L. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). A new perspective on method variance: A measure-centric approach. Journal of Management, 45(3), 855–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316687295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., Yang, J., Ryan, M. K., Jetten, J., & Peters, K. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, N. K., Munt, K. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2020). Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(1), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620962569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stogdill, R. M. (1963). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire-form XII: An experimental revision. Bureau of Business Research, College of Commerce and Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, J. I., Garretsen, H., & Lammers, J. (2022). Leading and working from home in times of COVID-19: On the perceived changes in leadership behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211007452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader, 56(65), 9780203505984–16.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S. M. B., & Zhu, X. (2006). Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1076–1088. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22528174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tursunbayeva, A., DiLauro, S., & Antonelli, G. (2022). Remote work at the time of COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A scoping review. In S. R. Mondal, F. DiVirgilio, & S. Das (Eds.), HR analytics and digital hr practices: Digitalization post COVID-19 (pp. 127–169). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7099-2_6
   Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E. J., Fowler, J. H., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., & Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25006-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M. (2017). Evolutionary psychology: Theoretical foundations for the study of organizations: JOD research primer series. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0019-9
   Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M., & Grabo, A. E. (2015). The many faces of leadership: An evolutionary-psychology approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415601971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M., & Schaller, M. (2008). Evolutionary approaches to group dynamics: An introduction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zoonen, W., & Sivunen, A. E. (2022). The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(4), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2021.2002299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegge, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2003). Group goal setting, social identity, and self-categorization. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 43–59). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10(6), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & O’Boyle, E. H., Jr. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). 12 Structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903065683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S., Michaelides, G., Inceoglu, I., Niven, K., Kelleher, A., Hurren, E., & Daniels, K. (2022). Satisfaction with one’s job and working at home in the COVID-19 pandemic: A two-wave study. Applied Psychology, 72(4), 1409–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar