‘I don’t think I’ve ever had discussions about reading’: a case study of FE literacy teachers’ conceptualisations of literacy

References

• Avis, J., and A. Bathmaker. 2005. “Becoming a Lecturer in Further Education in England: The Construction of Professional Identity and the Role of Communities of Practice.” Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 31 (1): 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, J., A.-M. Bathmaker, and J. Parsons. 2002. “‘I Think a Lot of Staff Are Dinosaurs’: Further Education Trainee Teachers’ Understandings of Pedagogic Relations.” Journal of Education and Work 15 (2): 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D. 1994. “Exploring Family Literacy.” RaPAL Bulletin 24: 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D. 2005. “Situating Literacies.” In Insights from Research and Practice, edited by M. Herrington and A. Kendall, 3–29. Leicester: NIACE.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 1998. Local Literacies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Basic Skills Agency. 2001. Adult Literacy Core Curriculum. London: Basic Skills Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Belsey, C., and J. Moore. 1989. The Feminist Reader: Essays in Gender and the Politics of Literary Criticism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, P., A. Kendall, and J. McDougall. 2011. After the Media. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Rev. ed. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Black Country Observatory. 2004. “The Learning Digest Pre-consultation Draft Report.” Black Country Learning and Skills Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1992. Language and Symbolic Power. Translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2002. Distinction, A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and J.-C. Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. 2012. “The Role of CPD in Teacher Education.” IfL. Accessed July 17, 2012. http://www.ifl.ac.uk/cpd/cpd-guidance-and-resources/learning-fair-resources-to-support-your-cpd2/london-learning-fair-presentations/the-role-of-reflective-practice-in-cpd-and-teacher-education
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. 2009. “Personal Digital Literacies versus Classroom Literacies: Investigating Pre-service Teachers’ Digital Lives in and beyond the Classroom.” In Digital Literacies: Social Learning and Classroom Practices, edited by V. Carrington and M. Robinson, 115–129. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, J., R. Edwards, K. Miller, and J. Smith. 2007. “Researching Literacy for Learning in the Vocational Curriculum.” In The Pedagogy of Lifelong Learning: Understanding Effective Teaching and Learning in Diverse Contexts, edited by Mike Osborne, Muir Houston, and Nuala Toman, 79–89. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castleton, G. 2001. “The Role of Literacy in People’s Lives: A Case Study of its Use amongst the Homeless in Australia.” In Powerful Literacies, edited by J. Crowther, M. Hamilton, and L. Tett, 56–68. Leicester: NIACE.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. M., and P. L. Peterson. 1986. “Teachers’ Thought Processes.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by M. C. Wittrock, 3rd ed., 255–296. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., and K. Rumbold. 2006. Reading for Pleasure: A Research Overview. London: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 1997. New Literary Histories: New Historicism and Contemporary Criticism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis, eds. 2002. Multiliteracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, T., M. Mottram, F. Collins, S. Powell, and K. Safford. 2009. “Teachers as Readers: Building Communities of Readers.” Literacy 43 (1): 11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, J., M. Hamilton, and L. Tett. 2001. “Powerful Literacies: An Introduction.” In Powerful Literacies, edited by J. Crowther, M. Hamilton, and L. Tett, 1–4. Leicester: NIACE.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. 2009. “A Space for Play: Crossing Boundaries and Learning Online.” In Contentious Technologies: Digital Literacies, Social Learning and Classroom Practices, edited by V. Carrington and M. Robinson, 27–42. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Critical Language Awareness. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• FENTO. 2001. “FENTO Standards.” http://www.third-conditional.net/fento.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 1990. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2000. “New People in New Worlds: Networks, the New Capitalism and Schools.” In Multiliteracies, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 43–68. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2003. What Video Games Have to Teach about Language and Literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011. How to Do Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillian, J., and D. Barton. 2010. Digital Literacies: A Research Briefing by the Technology Enhanced Learning Phase of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R., R. Edwards, D. Barton, M. Martin-Jones, Z. Fowler, B. Hughes, G. Mannion, K. Miller, C. Satchwell, and J. Smith. 2009. Improving Learning in College: Rethinking Literacies across the Curriculum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kehler, M. D., and C. Greig. 2005. “Boys Can Read: Exploring the Socially Literate Practices of High School Young Men.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 9 (4): 351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, A. 2005. “Reading Reader Identities in Black Country Further Education Communities.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, A. 2008a. “Giving Up Reading: Re-imagining Reading with Young Adult Readers.” Journal of Research and Practice in Adult Literacy 65 (Spring/Summer): 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, A. 2008b. “Playing and Resisting: Rethinking Young People’s Reading Cultures.” Literacy 42 (3): 123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Kerin, R. 2009. “Digital Portraits: Teacher Education and Multiliteracies Pedagogy.” In Digital Literacies: Social Learning and Classroom Practices, edited by V. Carrington and M. Robinson, 131–146. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 1990. Linguistic Processes in Sociolinguistic Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., and Michele Knobel. 2006. New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lingfield, R. 2012. Professionalism in Further Education: Interim Report of the Independent Review Panel. London: BIS. Accessed July 13, 2012. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/further-education-skills/docs/p/12-670-professionalism-in-further-education-interim.pdf
   Google Scholar
• LLUK. 2002. “New Overarching Standards for Teachers, Tutors and Trainers in the Lifelong Learning Sector.” http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/2335/1/app_prof_standards_literacy_esol.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, J., and M. Zukas. 1999a. “Adult Educators in Higher Education; The Paradox of Inclusion.” Paper presented at SCUTREA, 30th Annual Conference, University of Nottingham, UK, July 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, J., and M. Zukas. 1999b. “Models of the Educator in Higher Education: Perspectives and Problems.” Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Collaborative Learning for the 21st Century, University of Calgary, June 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., and R. Ivanic. 2007. “Mapping Literacy Practices: Theory, Methodology, Methods.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20 (1): 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., K. Miller, I. Gibb, and R. Goodman. 2009. “Reading, Writing, Resonating: Striking Chords across the Contexts of Students’ Everyday and College Lives.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 17 (3): 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., ed. 2004. Popular Culture, New Media and Digital Literacy in Early Childhood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, J., S. Walker, and A. Kendall. 2006. “Shaping up? Three Acts of Education Studies as Textual Critique.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 16 (2): 159–173.
   Google Scholar
• Millard, E. 1997. “Differently Literate: Gender Identity and the Construction of the Developing Reader.” Gender and Education 9 (1): 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T., T. McGuire, and M. Baynham. 2006. A Literature Review of Research on Teacher Education in Adult Literacy, Numeracy and ESOL. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
   Google Scholar
• Nell, V. 1988. “The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure: Needs and Gratifications.” Reading Research Quarterly 23 (6). Accessed August 23, 2011. http://www.msu.edu/~dwong/CEP991/CEP991Resources/Nell-RdngPleasure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peim, N. 1993. Critical Theory and the English Teacher. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pember, S. 2001. Keynote address given to RaPAL conference, University of Nottingham, June.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. “Digital Narratives, Digital Immigrants.” On the Horizon 9 (5). MCB University Press. Accessed July 20, 2011. http://tinyurl.com/ypgvf
   Google Scholar
• Pullman, P. 2004. “The War on Words.” Guardian Review, June 11. Accessed August 23, 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2004/nov/06/usa.politics
   Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti, J. 2000. “An Adventure in ‘Postmodern’ Action Research.” In Research and Knowledge at Work: Perspectives, Case-studies and Innovative Strategies, edited by J. Garrick and C. Rhodes, 232–249. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2009. The Digital Native – Myth and Reality. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. 1997. “Methodology Matters!” In Introducing Women’s Studies: Feminist Theory and Practice, edited by V. Robinson and D. Richardson, 2nd ed., 198–219. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1995. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1999. “The Implications of the ‘New Literacy Studies’ for Literacy Education.” English in Education 31 (3): 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2001. “Contexts for Literacy Work: The ‘New Orders’ and the ‘New Literacy Studies’.” In Powerful Literacies, edited by J. Crowther, M. Hamilton, and L. Tett, 13–22. Leicester: NIACE.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, M. 2008. “Dealing with Uncertainty: Challenges and Possibilities for the Early Childhood Profession.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 16 (2): 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, M. 2009. “Strategies for Change: Rethinking Professionalism in Early Childhood.” Keynote presentation to the International Professional Development Association Conference, Birmingham, November 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Zancanella, D. 1991. “Teachers Reading/Readers Teaching: Five Teachers’ Personal Approaches to Literature and Their Teaching of Literature.” Research in the Teaching of English 25 (1): 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar