Evaluating the nature of summative feedback on electronically submitted work at a UK University: implications for post-compulsory education

References

• Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2017. “Researching Feedback Dialogue: An Interactional Analysis Approach.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 252–265. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew, S., and C. Lodge. 2000. “Gifts, Ping-pong and Loops - Linking Feedback and Learning.” In Feedback for Learning, edited by S. Askew, 1–18. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., P. Dawson, D. Boud, S. Bennett, M. Hall, and E. Molloy. 2016. “Support for Assessment Practice: Developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (5): 545–556. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont, C., M. O’Doherty, and L. Shannon. 2011. “Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning?” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 671–687. doi:10.1080/03075071003731135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1995. “Assessment and Learning: Contradictory or Complementary.” Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, edited by P. Knight, 35–48. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2): 151–167. doi:10.1080/713695728.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2006. “Relocating Reflection in the Context of Practice: Rehabilitation or Rejection?” Paper Presented at Professional Lifelong Learning: Beyond Reflective Practice, Leeds, July.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2009. “How Can Practice Reshape Assessment?” In Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, edited by G. Joughin, 29–44. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2015. “Feedback: Ensuring that It Leads to Enhanced Learning.” The Clinical Teacher 12 (1): 3–7. doi:10.1111/tct.12345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Lawson, and D. Thompson. 2015. “Does Student Engagement in Self-assessment Calibrate Their Judgement over Time?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (8): 941–956. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.769198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and R. Soler. 2016. “Sustainable Assessment Revisited.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (3): 400–413. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 2007. “Feedback: The Student Perspective.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 12 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1080/13596740601155363.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2015. “Exploring Learning-oriented Assessment Practices.” Higher Education 69 (6): 963–976. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2016. “Feedback as Dialogue.” In Encyclopaedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, edited by M. A. Peters, 1–6. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2018a. “Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Written Feedback Research.” Language Assessment Quarterly 15 (4): 330–347. doi:10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2018b. “Interpersonal Aspect of Written Feedback: A Community College Students’ Perspective.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 23 (4): 499–519. doi:10.1080/13596748.2018.1526906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, L. 2013. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning (2nd Ed.). [E-reader version]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• HEA. 2012. A Marked Improvement: Transforming Assessment in Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• HEA. 2016. Framework for Transforming Assessment in Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. 1997. “The Impact of Teacher Written Feedback on ESL Writers.” PhD Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Jackel, B., J. Pearce, A. Radloff, and D. Edwards. 2017. Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature for the Higher Education Academy. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. MacFarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. J. Maw, J. R. Park, S. Gomez, and A. C. Crook. 2013. “Moving Feedback Forward: Theory to Practice.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (2): 240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and A. Zusho. 2002. “The Development of Academic Self-regulation: The Role of Cognitive and Motivational Factors.” In Development of Achievement Motivation, edited by A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles, 249–284. San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sambell, K. 2013. “Involving Students in the Scholarship of Assessment: Student Voices on the Feedback Agenda for Change.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, and M. Taras, 80–91. London: Routlege.
   Google Scholar
• Sambell, K. 2016. “Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: Considerable Room for Improvement?” Student Engagement in Higher Education 1 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D., and G. Blanco Ramírez. 2017. “Against ‘Teaching Excellence’: Ideology, Commodification, and Enabling the Neoliberalization of Postsecondary Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (4): 396–407. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1301913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M. 2010. “The Sound of Feedback in Higher Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 35 (1): 53–64. doi:10.1080/17439881003671128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To, J. 2016. “‘This Is Not What I Need’: Conflicting Assessment Feedback Beliefs in a Post-secondary Institution in Hong Kong.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 21 (4): 447–467. doi:10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardi, I. 2013. “Effectively Feeding Forward from One Written Assessment Task to the Next.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (5): 599–610. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.670197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., and D. Carless. 2017. “Only True Friends Could Be Cruelly Honest: Cognitive Scaffolding and Social-affective Support in Teacher Feedback Literacy.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (7): 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar