Perceptions of performativity in English Further Education

References

• Ab Kadir, M.A, and . 2017. “Engendering a Culture of Thinking in a Culture of Performativity: The Challenge of Mediating Tensions in the Singaporean Educational System.” Cambridge Journal of Education 47 (2): 227–246. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2016.1148115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, F. 2012. ”The construction of professionalism in vocational education and training in Ireland: A mixed methods study of trainers' roles and professional development in the workplace.” PhD diss. Dublin City University PhD diss.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, M. 2020. “Performativity and the Demise of the Teaching Profession: The Need for Rebalancing in Australia.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 48 (3): 301–315. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2019.1644611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Colleges. 2019. Aoc College Key Facts 2019–20. London.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, J., A. Kendal, and J. Parsons. 2003. “Crossing the Boundaries: Expectations and Experience of Newcomers to Higher and Further Education.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 8 (2): 179–196. doi:10.1080/13596740300200148.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti, A. A., J. M. Diefendorff, A. S. Gabriel, and M. M. Chandler. 2015. “The Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sources of Motivation on Well-Being Depend on Time of Day: The Moderating Effects of Workday Accumulation.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 88: 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boocock, A. 2013. “Further Education Performance Indicators: A Motivational or A Performative Tool?” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 18 (3): 309–325. doi:10.1080/13596748.2013.819272.
   Google Scholar
• Boocock, A. 2014. “Increased Success Rates in an FE College: The Product of a Rational or a Performative College Culture?” Journal of Education and Work 27 (4): 351–371. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.758356.
   Google Scholar
• Boocock, A. 2019. “Meeting the Needs of Local Communities and Businesses: From Transactional to Eco-Leadership in the English Further Education Sector.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 47 (3): 349–368. doi:10.1177/1741143217739364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brace, I. 2018. Questionnaire Design: How to Plan, Structure and Write Survey Material for Effective Market Research. 4th ed. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, J., and J. Gold. 2012. Human Resource Management: Theory & Practice. 5th ed. Basingstoke: MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, A. R. J. 2007. “Exploring Professional Identities: Middle Leadership in Further Education Colleges.” School Leadership and Management 27: 471–485. doi:10.1080/13632430701606152.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., and J. White. 2008. “Creativity and Performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian Education.” British Educational Research Journal 34: 667–682. doi:10.1080/01411920802224238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busetti, S., and B. Dente. 2014. “Focus on the Finger, Overlook the Moon: The Introduction of Performance Management in the Administration of Italian Universities.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36 (2): 225–237. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.884674.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T., and D. Glover. 2014. “School Leadership Models: What Do We Know?” School Leadership and Management 34: 553–571. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.928680.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T., and D. Middlewood. 2013. Leading and Managing People in Education. 3rd ed. LA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., A. Cunliffe, and G. Grandy. 2018. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: Methods and Challenges. London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781526430236.
   Google Scholar
• Christophersen, K. A., E. Elstad, and A. Turmo. 2010. “Is Teacher Accountability Possible? The Case of Norwegian High School Science.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 54 (5): 413–429. doi:10.1080/00313831.2010.508906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, A., and R. Vickers. 2017. “Policy, Practice and Innovative Governance in the English Further Education and Skills Sector.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 22 (3): 370–390. doi:10.1080/13596748.2017.1358518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., M. Kornberger, T. Pitsis, and M. Mount. 2019. Managing and Organizations. An Introduction to Theory and Practice. 5th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield, F., S. Edward, I. Finlay, A. Hodgson, K. Spours, and R. Steer. 2008. Improving Learning, Skills and Inclusion: The Impact of Policy on Post-Compulsory Education. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203928998.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, S. 2017. “From Teacher to Manager: Expectations and Challenge in the Further Education Sector. A Relationship Model.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 22 (2): 208–220. doi:10.1080/13596748.2017.1314680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., and T. Guetterman. 2019. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, J. 2008. “Do Data Characteristics Change according to the Number of Scale Points Used.” International Journal of Market Research 50 (1): 61–104. doi:10.1177/147078530805000106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F., and D. Dodou. 2010. “Five-Point Likert Items: T Test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 15 (11): 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/bj1p-ts64
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. M. Ryan, and R. Koestner. 1999. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 125: 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, C. A., O. Springbett, and L. Walker. 2020. “Further Education College Leaders: Securing the Sector’s Future.” Futures 115: 102478. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2020a. “College Oversight: Support and Intervention Accessed 27 05 2021.” London. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/929201/College_Oversight_document_Oct_20_updates_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2020b. “Further Education Commissioner Intervention Reports,” December 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/further-education-commissioner-intervention-reports#intervention-reports-and-ministerial-responses:-2020
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2021. “Skills for Jobs: Lifelong Learning for Opportunity and Growth Accessed 27 05 2021.” London. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/957856/Skills_for_jobs_lifelong_learning_for_opportunity_and_growth__web_version_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Devisch, M. 1998. “The Kioto People Management Model.” Total Quality Management 9 (4–5): 62–65. doi:10.1080/0954412988578.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. 2001. “Delving Deeper into Morale, Job Satisfaction and Motivation among Education Professionals: Re-Examining the Leadership Dimension.” Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 29 (3). doi:10.1177/0263211X010293004.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. 2018. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed. London: ProtoView.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. G., S. A. Peffer, G. B. Sprinkle, and M. G. Williamson. 2015. “Performance Target Levels and Effort: Reciprocity across Single- and Repeated-Interaction Settings.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 27 (2): 145–164. doi:10.2308/jmar-51089.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. 2012. “The Implementation of a New Policy on Teacher Appraisal in Portugal: How Do Teachers Experience It at School?” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 24 (4): 351–368. doi:10.1007/s11092-012-9153-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, K., and H. Stevenson. 2019. “Global Education Reform: Understanding the Movement.” Educational Review 71: 1–4. doi:10.1080/00131911.2019.1532718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Further Education Commissioner. 2020. “2020 Accessed 27 05 2021.” https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/further-education-commissioner/about
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, D., and D. Knights. 2006. “Challenging Dualism: Public Professionalism in ‘Troubled’times.” Sociology 40: 277–295. doi:10.1177/0038038506062033.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, D., J. Hughes, M. O’Leary, and R. Smith. 2015. “The State of Professional Practice and Policy in the English Further Education System: A View from Below.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 20 (1): 78–95. doi:10.1080/13596748.2015.993877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. 2004. “Education for All: The Globalization of Learning Targets.” Comparative Education 40 (1): 7–14. doi:10.1080/0305006042000184854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., and A. O’Shea. 2013. “Common-sense neoliberalism“ In Soundings 55 9–25. doi:10.3898/136266213809450194.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, R., C. James, and C. Forrest. 2016. “The Challenges Facing Further Education College Governors in England: A Time for Caution or Creativity?” Management in Education 30 (2): 79–85. doi:10.1177/0892020616637232.
   Google Scholar
• Hobley, J. 2019. “Rites of Passage, Moving into Management: Practice Architectures and Professionalism.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 24 (4): 424–438. doi:10.1080/13596748.2019.1654686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., and J. Brass. 2018. “Making Accountable Teachers: The Terrors and Pleasures of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (3): 361–382. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husband, G., and C. Lloyd. 2019. “Reimagining Middle Leadership in Further Education. Report of the Middle Leaders Working Group.” CSPACE Journal 2 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jafar, A. J. N. 2018. “What Is Positionality and Should It Be Expressed in Quantitative Studies?” Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ emermed-2017-207158. doi:10.1136/emermed-2017-207158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jamieson, S. 2004. “Likert Scales: How to (Ab)use Them.” Medical Education 38: 1217–1218. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G., K. Scholes, R. Whittington, D. Angwin, and P. Regnér. 2017. Exploring Strategy. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Keep, E. 2018. “Marketisation in English Further Education - the Challenges for Management and Leadership.” Education Journal Review 25 (2): 84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Korkut Altuna, O., and F. M. Arslan. 2016. “Impact of the Number of Scale Points on Data Characteristics and Respondents’ Evaluations: An Experimental Design Approach Using 5-Point and 7-Point Likert-Type Scales.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi (55): 1–20. doi:10.17124/iusiyasal.320009.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, S. 2014. Leading for the Future. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J 2010 “Knights and Knaves Return: Public Service Motivation and the Delivery of Public Services ” International Public Management Journal 13 (1): 56–71 doi:10.1080/10967490903547290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckie, G., and H. Goldstein. 2017. “The Evolution of School League Tables in England 1992–2016: “Contextual Value-Added”, “Expected Progress” and “Progress 8”.” British Educational Research Journal 43 (2): 193–212. doi:10.1002/berj.3264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckie, G., and H. Goldstein. 2019. “The Importance of Adjusting for Pupil Background in School Value-Added Models: A Study of Progress 8 and School Accountability in England.” British Educational Research Journal 45 (3): 518–537. doi:10.1002/berj.3511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 2011. Taking Targets to Task Revisited: How Indicators of Progress on Access to Education Can Mislead. CREATE Pathways to Access. Research Monograph No. 54.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., and I. Hardy. 2015. “Funding, Reputation and Targets: The Discursive Logics of High-Stakes Testing.” Cambridge Journal of Education 45 (2): 245–264. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2014.936826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell, T. M., and J. K. Kruschke. 2018. “Analyzing Ordinal Data with Metric Models: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79: 328–348. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, P. 2010. “Research into Questionnaire Design: A Summary of the Literature.” International Journal of Market Research 52 (2): 249–272. doi:10.2501/S147078530920120X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, N., and N. Crowther. 2016. “The Logic of the Incorporation of Further Education Colleges in England 1993–2015: Towards an Understanding of Marketisation, Change and Instability.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (5): 583–597. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1137635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, P., and G. Weiner. 2019. “Neo-Liberalism and the State of Higher Education in the UK.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 43 (4): 560–572. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1378314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell, W. 2011. “Improving Exam Results, but to What End? The Limitations of New Labour’s Control Mechanism for Schools: Assessment-Based Accountability.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 43 (4): 291–308. doi:10.1080/00220620.2011.606896.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2010. “A Workforce of Cynics? The Effects of Contemporary Reforms on Public Service Motivation.” International Public Management Journal 13 (1): 24–34. doi:10.1080/10967490903547167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. 2004. “Making Managers within Post-Compulsory Education: Policy, Performativity and Practice.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 9 (2): 183–202. doi:10.1080/13596740400200174.
   Google Scholar
• Ordóñez, L. D., M. E. Schweitzer, A. D. Galinsky, and M. H. Bazerman. 2009. “Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Overprescribing Goal Setting.” Academy of Management Perspectives 23 (1): 6–16. doi:10.5465/AMP.2009.37007999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. 2011. “Fundamentalists, Priests, Martyrs and Converts: A Typology of First Tier Management in Further Education.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 16 (1): 101–121. doi:10.1080/13596748.2011.549738.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, B. 2015. “Bringing Accountability up to Date with the Realities of Public Sector Management in the 21st Century.” Canadian Public Administration 58 (1): 183–203. doi:10.1111/capa.12107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, J. M. L. 2004. “Effects of Performance Appraisal Politics on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention.” Personnel Review 33 (3): 322–334. doi:10.1108/00483480410528850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propper, C., and D. Wilson. 2003. “The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19 (2): 250–267. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, K. 2014. Introduction to Research Methods in Education. 2nd ed. LA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. 2010. “Further and Higher Education Partnerships in England, 1997–2010: A Study of Cultures and Perceptions Accessed 07 05 2021.” Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/10182/1/RobinsonDeniseFinalThesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seufert, M. 2019. “Fundamental Advantages of considering Quality of Experience Distributions over Mean Opinion Scores.” 2019 11th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2019 Berlin, Germany. doi:10.1109/QoMEX.2019.8743296.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. D. 2016. “Designing Questions and Questionnaires.” In The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology (London: Sage). doi:10.4135/9781473957893.n16.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M., F. Camm, C. L. Damberg, L. S. Hamilton, K. J. Mullen, C. Nelson, P. Sorensen, et al. 2012. “Toward a Culture of Consequences: Performance-Based Accountability Systems for Public Services.” Rand Health Quarterly 2 (1): 5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, R., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2014. “Are Performance Management Practices Associated With Better Outcomes? Empirical Evidence From New York Public Schools.” The American Review of Public Administration 44 (3): 324–338. doi:10.1177/0275074012468058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teye, J. K. 2012. “Benefits, Challenges, and Dynamism of Positionalities Associated with Mixed Methods Research in Developing Countries: Evidence from Ghana.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (4): 379–391. doi:10.1177/1558689812453332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., and P. Wolstencroft. 2015. “Promises and Lies: An Exploration of Curriculum Managers’ Experiences in FE.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 39 (3): 399–416. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2013.858676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., and P. Wolstencroft. 2018. “Trust into Mistrust: The Uncertain Marriage between Public and Private Sector Practice for Middle Managers in Education.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 23 (2): 213–230. doi:10.1080/13596748.2018.1444372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., C. Fontdevila, and L. Parcerisa. 2019. “Reforming Governance through Policy Instruments: How and to What Extent Standards, Tests and Accountability in Education Spread Worldwide.” Discourse. doi:10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. 2011. “Professionalism and the Post-Performative Teacher: New Teachers Reflect on Autonomy and Accountability in the English School System.” Professional Development in Education 37 (3): 389–409. doi:10.1080/19415257.2010.514204.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, C., D. Joye, T. Smith, and Y.-C. Fu. 2016 Survey Methodology: Challenges and Principles. The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology (London: Sage). doi:10.4135/9781473957893.
   Google Scholar
• Wolgemuth, J. R., Z. Erdil-Moody, J. E. Tara Opsal, T. K. Cross, E. M. Dickmann, and S. Colomer. 2015. “Participants’ Experiences of the Qualitative Interview: Considering the Importance of Research Paradigms.” Qualitative Research 15 (3): 351–372. doi:10.1177/1468794114524222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstencroft, P., and C. Lloyd. 2019. “Process to Practice: The Evolving Role of the Academic Middle Manager in English Further Education Colleges.” Management in Education 33 (3): 118–125. doi:10.1177/0892020619840074.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. 2007. “Public Service and Motivation: Does Mission Matter?” Public Administration Review 67 (1): 54–64. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00696.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, P., and H. J. Kim. 2019. “Exploring the Relationship between External and Internal Accountability in Education: A Cross-Country Analysis with Multi-Level Structural Equation Modeling.” International Journal of Educational Development 65: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar