Surveying TEFL MA students’ attitude towards research and research methodology course: a mixed research approach

References

• Addison, W. E., J. R. Stowell, and M. D. Reab. 2015. “Attributes of Introductory Psychology and Statistics Teachers: Findings from Comments on RateMyprofessors.Com.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 1 (3): 229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000034.
   Google Scholar
• Aguado, N. A. 2009. “Teaching Research Methods: Learning by Doing.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 15 (2): 251–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2009.12001557.
   Google Scholar
• Amini Farsani, M., and E. Babaii. 2019. “EFL Faculty Members’ Research Engagement: Voices from Iran.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 24 (1): 37–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2019.1584437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini Farsani, M., and E. Babaii. 2020. “Applied Linguistics Research in Three Decades: A Methodological Synthesis of Graduate Theses in an EFL Context.” Quality & Quantity 54 (4): 1257–1283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00984-w.
   Google Scholar
• Amini Farsani, M., H. R. Jamali, M. Beikmohammadi, B. Daneshvar Ghorbani, and L. Soleimani. 2021. “Methodological Orientations, Academic Citations, and Scientific Collaboration in Applied Linguistics: What Do Research Synthesis and Bibliometrics Indicate?” System 100: 102547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini Farsani, M., and V. Mohammadi. 2022. “Mixed-Methods Research in an EFL Context: A Quality Assessment Perspective.” Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 9 (2): 99–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2021.14436.1771.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, C. T., and L. E. Pelco. 2006. “Teaching Research Methods to Undergraduate Psychology Students Using an Active Cooperative Learning Approach.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 17 (2): 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Barraket, J. 2005. “Teaching Research Method Using a Student-Centered Approach? Critical Reflections on Practice.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 2 (2): 17–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.53761/1.2.2.3.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, S., J. T. Siegel, A. Davis, and L. D. Falco. 2002. “School counselors’ Interest in Professional Literature and Research.” Professional School Counseling 5 (5): 346.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, A., and D. Blackman. 2003. “Can Research Methods Ever Be Interesting?” Active Learning in Higher Education 4 (1): 39–55. doi:10.1177/1469787403004001004.
   Google Scholar
• Braguglia, K. H., and K. A. Jackson. 2012. “Teaching Research Methodology Using a Project-Based Three Course Sequence Critical Reflections on Practice.” American Journal of Business Education (AJBE) 5 (3): 347–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v5i3.7007.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, L. T., S. E. Brown, R. B. Gardner, and R. L. Davidson. 2009. “D. RA. MA: An Extended Conceptualization of Student Anxiety in Criminal Justice Research Methods Courses.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 20 (3): 217–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250903109348.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. 2015. “Why bother learning advanced quantitative methods in L2 research?.” In Advancing quantitative methods in L2 research, edited by L. Plonsky, 9–20. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burkley, E., and M. Burkley. 2009. “A Tool for Teaching Research Methods in Psychology.” Teaching of Psychology 36 (3): 179–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. 1991. “A Method of Analysing Interview Transcripts in Qualitative Research.” Nurse Education Today 11 (6): 461–466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burnard, P. 1996. “Teaching the Analysis of Textual Data: An Experiential Approach.” Nurse Education Today 16 (4): 278–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-6917(96)80115-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, H. 2013. “Notes from the Editor: Celebrating 100 Years of the Modern Language Journal.” The Modern Language Journal 100 (S1): 3–18. doi:10.1111/modl.12321.
   Google Scholar
• Campisi, J., and K. E. Finn. 2011. “Does Active Learning Improve students’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Research Methods?” Journal of College Science Teaching 40 (4): 38.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarocco, N. J., G. W. Lewandowski Jr, and M. Van Volkom. 2013. “The Impact of a Multifaceted Approach to Teaching Research Methods on students’ Attitudes.” Teaching of Psychology 40 (1): 20–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312465859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciarocco, N. J., D. B. Strohmetz, and G. W. Lewandowski. 2017. “What’s the Point? Faculty Perceptions of Research Methods Courses.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 3 (2): 116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000085.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315456539.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, V. A., H. Castleden, and I. T. Meerveld. 2010. “Teaching Research Methods Courses in Human Geography: Critical Reflections.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 34 (2): 155–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260903093646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, B., V. Kumar, and N. Omar. 2017. “Postgraduate Conception of Research Methodology: Implications for Learning and Teaching.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 41 (2): 220–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2017.1283397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, I. 1995. “Reducing Fragmentation in Qualitative Research.” In Computer Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Practice, edited by U. Kelle, 69–79, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diab, R. 2006. “Teaching Practices and Student Learning in the Introductory Research Methods Class.” TESEL-EJ 10 (2): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downe-Wamboldt, B. 1992. “Content Analysis: Method, Applications, and Issues.” Health Care for Women International 13 (3): 313–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earley, M. A. 2014. “A Synthesis of the Literature on Research Methods Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (3): 242–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., and A. Ahlgren. 1988. “Difficulties in Learning Basic Concepts in Probability and Statistics: Implications for Research.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19 (1): 44–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.1.0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurung, R. A. R., and R. Stoa. 2020. “A National Survey of Teaching and Learning Research Methods: Important Concepts and Faculty and Student Perspectives.” Teaching of Psychology 47 (2): 111–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320901374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, M. R., and E. Babaii. 2013. “Mixed Methods Research: Toward New Research Designs in Applied Linguistics.” The Modern Language Journal 97 (4): 828–852. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. 2015. “Analyzing qualitative data.” In Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Guide Partridge, edited by B. Paltridge and A. Phakiti, 60–73. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, T., and L. Llosa. 2015. “Design Issues and Inference in Experimental L2 Research.” Language Learning 65 (S1): 76–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12113.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., and L. B. Christensen. 2019. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaeedi, A., A. R. Nasr Esfahani, F. Sharifian, and S. Moosavipour. 2021. “Research Methods Curriculum in Graduate Programme: An Investigation of the World’s Top Universities Approaches to Design, Implementation and Evaluation.” Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies 10 (32): 37–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. H. 2001. “Predicting the Scholarly Activity of Counseling Psychology Students: A Refinement and Extension.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 48 (3): 344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson-Hall, J., and L. Plonsky. 2015. “Reporting and Interpreting Quantitative Research Findings: What Gets Reported and Recommendations for the Field.” Language Learning 65 (S1): 127–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12115.
   Google Scholar
• Lehti, S., and E. Lehtinen. 2005. “Computer‐Supported Problem‐Based Learning in the Research Methodology Domain.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49 (3): 297–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109618.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, E., and E. Rui. 1996. “Computer-Supported Complex Learning: An Environment for Learning Experimental Methods and Statistical Inference.” Machine-Mediated Learning 5 (3): 149–175.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, S. A. 2008. “Factors Changing Attitudes of Graduate School Students Toward an Introductory Research Methodology Course.” Education 128 (4): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, S. A. 2010. “College Research Methodology Courses: Revisiting General Instructional Goals and Objectives.” Journal of Instructional Psychology 37 (3): 236–240.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, L., and D. Liu. 2019. “Research Trends in Applied Linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A Bibliometric Analysis and Its Implications.” Applied Linguistics 40 (3): 540–561. doi:10.1093/applin/amy003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite, S., and M. Nind. 2016. “Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Expert Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice.” British Journal of Educational Studies 64 (4): 413–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1197882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. 2020. “Theorizing Research Methods in the Golden Age of Applied Linguistics Research.” In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, edited by J. McKinley and H. Rose. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780367824471.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. 1991. “Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation.” Nursing Research 40 (2): 120–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M. 2005. “University students’ Research Orientations: Do Negative Attitudes Exist Toward Quantitative Methods?” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49 (3): 263–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109568.
   Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M. 2015. “University students’ Understanding of the Concepts Empirical, Theoretical, Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (7): 684–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1072152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M., and E. Lehtinen. 2005. “Conceptions of Research and Methodology Learning.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49 (3): 217–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109519.
   Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M., E. Olkinuora, P. Tynjälä, and E. Lehtinen. 2008. ““Do I Need Research Skills in Working life?”: University students’ Motivation and Difficulties in Quantitative Methods Courses.” Higher Education 56 (5): 599–612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9113-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., D. Kilburn, and R. Luff. 2015. “The Teaching and Learning of Social Research Methods: Developments in Pedagogical Knowledge.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (5): 455–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1062631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, J. M., S. J. Ross, and R. Schoonen. 2015. “Improving Second Language Quantitative Research.” Language Learning 65 (S1): 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12110.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 2000. “Statistics Anxiety and the Role of Self-Perceptions.” The Journal of Educational Research 93 (5): 323–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and K. M. T. Collins. 2007. “A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research.” The Qualitative Report 12 (2): 281–316.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and C. E. Daley 1998. “The Relationship Between Learning Styles and Statistics Anxiety in a Research Methodology Course.” In A paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Deigo, United States vol. 13, pp. 270–277.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., J. R. Slate, and R. A. Schwartz. 2001. “Role of Study Skills in Graduate-Level Educational Research Courses.” The Journal of Educational Research 94 (4): 238–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670109598757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, M. A. 2011. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Educators’ Attitudes Toward Educational Research Scale.” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 11 (2): 737–748.
   Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, E. C. 2005. “Factor Structure of the Attitudes Toward Research Scale.” Statistics Education Research Journal 4 (1): 16–26. doi:10.52041/serj.v4i1.523.
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. 2013. “Study Quality in SLA: An Assessment of Designs, Analyses, and Reporting Practices in Quantitative L2 Research.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35 (4): 655–687. doi:10.1017/S0272263113000399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. 2017. “Quantitative Research Methods.” In The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 505–521. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Purpura, J. E., J. D. Brown, and R. Schoonen. 2015. “Improving the Validity of Quantitative Measures in Applied Linguistics Research 1.” Language Learning 65 (S1): 37–75. doi:10.1111/lang.12112.
   Google Scholar
• Rautopuro, J., P. Vaisanen, and A. Malin. 2007. “From Misunderstanding to Misapplication? Difficulties Encountered by Finnish Students of Education in Learning Quantitative Research Methods.” Learning and Teaching of Research Methods at University Research in Educational Sciences 30: 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• Riazi, A. M. 2016. “Innovative Mixed-Methods Research: Moving Beyond Design Technicalities to Epistemological and Methodological Realizations.” Applied Linguistics 37 (1): 33–49. doi:10.1093/applin/amv064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riazi, A. M., and C. N. Candlin. 2014. “Mixed-Methods Research in Language Teaching and Learning: Opportunities, Issues and Challenges.” Language Teaching 47 (2): 135–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444813000505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottinghaus, P. J., A. R. Gaffey, F. H. Borgen, and C. A. Ralston. 2006. “Diverse Pathways of Psychology Majors: Vocational Interests, Self‐Efficacy, and Intentions.” The Career Development Quarterly 55 (1): 85–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00007.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., M. P. H. Rodgers . 2019. “An Introduction to Applied Linguistics”. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429424465.
   Google Scholar
• Sizemore, O. J., and G. W. Lewandowski Jr. 2009. “Learning Might Not Equal Liking: Research Methods Course Changes Knowledge but Not Attitudes.” Teaching of Psychology 36 (2): 90–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strangman, L., and E. Knowles. 2012. “Improving the Development of Student’s Research Questions and Hypotheses in an Introductory Business Research Methods Course.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2): n2. doi:https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060224.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. “Issues and Dilemmas in Teaching Research Methods Courses in Social and Behavioural Sciences: US Perspective.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1080/13645570305055.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., Z. Millei, L. Partridge, and L. Rodriguez. 2004. “The Getting of Access: The Trials and Tribulations of the Novice Researcher.” Issues in Educational Research 14 (1): 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Trimarco, K. A. 1997. “The Effects of a Graduate Learning Experience on Anxiety, Achievement, and Expectations in Research and Statistics.” A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northern Educational Research Association (28th, Ellenville, NY, October 28-30,)
   Google Scholar
• Vittengl, J. R., C. Y. Bosley, S. A. Brescia, E. A. Eckardt, J. M. Neidig, K. S. Shelver, and L. A. Sapenoff. 2004. “Why are Some Undergraduates More (And Others Less) Interested in Psychological Research?” Teaching of Psychology 31 (2): 91–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3102_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., G. Payne, L. Hodgkinson, and D. Poade. 2008. “Does British Sociology Count? Sociology students’ Attitudes Toward Quantitative Methods.” Sociology 42 (5): 1003–1021. doi:10.1177/0038038508094576.
   Google Scholar
• Winn, S. 1995. “Learning by Doing: Teaching Research Methods Through Student Participation in a Commissioned Research Project.” Studies in Higher Education 20 (2): 203–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. 2020. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Second Language Acquisition Between 1997 and 2018.”Studies in Second Language Acquisition.” 42 (1): 199–222. doi:10.1017/S0272263119000573.
   Google Scholar