‘Secondary foreign policy’ through the prism of cross-border governance in the US–Canada Pacific Northwest border region

References

• Alper, D. K. (1996), The idea of Cascadia: emergent transborder regionalisms in the Pacific Northwest-Western Canada, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.11, No.2, pp.1–22. doi: 10.1080/08865655.1996.9695488
   Google Scholar
• Alper, D. (2004), Emerging collaborative frameworks for environmental governance in the Georgia Basin-Puget sound ecosystem, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.19, No.1, pp.79–98. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2004.9695618
   Google Scholar
• Alper, D. and Hammond, B. (2011), Bordered perspectives: local stakeholders’ views of border management in the cascade corridor region, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.26, No.1, pp.101–114. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2011.590291
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. (2006), Biometric borders: governing mobilities in the war on terror, Political Geography, Vol.25, No.3, pp.336–351. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., O’Dowd, L. and Wilson, T. (eds) (2003), New Borders for a Changing Europe: Cross-border Cooperation and Governance. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Andreas, P. (2005), The Mexicanization of the US-Canada border: asymmetric interdependence in a changing security context, International Journal, Vol.60, No.2, 449–462. doi: 10.2307/40204302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artibise, A. F. J. (2005), Cascadian adventures: shared visions, strategic alliances, and ingrained barriers in a transborder region, in H. N. Nicol and I. Townsend-Gault (eds), Holding the Line: Borders in a Global World, pp.238–267. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. (2002), Politics and the Other Scene. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (2011), Grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit im Prozess der Europäischen integration, in B. Wassenberg and J. Beck (eds), Living and Researching Cross-border Cooperation (Vol. 3): The European Dimension of Cross-Border Cooperation, pp.129–148. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (ed.) (2011), The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2012), Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. and Tsoukala, A. (eds) (2008), Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes After 9/11. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2004), From ‘spaces of place’ to ‘spaces of flows’? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol.28, No.3, pp.530–548. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. K. (2001), Debordering the world of states: towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity in North America? Insights from border regions, European Journal of International Relations, Vol.7, No.2, pp.175–209. doi: 10.1177/1354066101007002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BPRI (Border Policy Research Institute) (2016), About. Available at http://www.wwu.edu/bpri/about/ (accessed 25 November 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Brunet-Jailly, E. (ed.) (2007), Borderlands: Comparing Border Security in North America and Europe. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Cancela Outeda, C. (2010), Panorama de la cooperación territorial en la eurorregión Galicia-Norte de Portugal, Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, Vol.56, No.1, pp.149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2012), Network governance theory: a Gramscian critique, Environment and Planning A, Vol.44, No.11, pp.2687–2704. doi: 10.1068/a4585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. and Spicer, A. (2015), Interrogating networks: towards an agnostic perspective on governance research, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol.33, No.2, pp.223–238. doi: 10.1068/c11292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingman, C. and Edgel, D. (2015), Monetizing some benefits of participation in NEXUS, BPRI Border Policy Brief, Vol.10, No.3.
   Google Scholar
• Dupeyron, B. (2008a), Cascadia revisited from European case-studies: the socio-political space of transnational networks, Canadian Political Science Review, Vol.2, No.2, pp.84–103.
   Google Scholar
• Dupeyron, B. (2008b), L’Europe au défi de ses régions transfrontalières. Expériences rhénane et pyrénéenne. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dupeyron, B. (2009), How history becomes a cross-border matter: death foretold of a French–German–Swiss textbook, Curriculum Journal, Vol.20, No.4, pp.345–364. doi: 10.1080/09585170903424823
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D. (2011), Toward a general theory of strategic action fields, Sociological Theory, Vol.29, No.1, pp.1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D. (2012), A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García-Alvarez, J. and Trillo-Santamaría, J. M. (2013), Between regional spaces and spaces of regionalism: cross-border region building in the Spanish ‘state of the autonomies’, Regional Studies, Vol.47, No.1, pp.104–115. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.552495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harguindéguy, J. B. and Hayward, K. (2014), The institutionalization of the European internal cross-border co-operation policy: a first appraisal, European Planning Studies, Vol.22, No.1, pp.184–203. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.741571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (2006), The War on Terror, local police, and immigration enforcement: a curious tale of police power in post-9/11 America, Rutger Law Journal, Vol.38, No.38, pp.1–60.
   Google Scholar
• IMTC (International Mobility & Trade Corridor Program) (2016), About. The IMTC. Available at http://theimtc.com/about/ (accessed 9 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002), The political economy of scale, in M. Perkmann and N. L. Sum (eds), Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-border Regions, pp.25–49. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. M. (2009), Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in central Europe: room for more transboundary space, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol.16, No.2, pp.177–191. doi: 10.1177/0969776409102190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, M. (2013), Euroregion Schleswig, Sønderjylland/Schleswig, Sønderjylland – Schleswig, Syddanmark – Schleswig-Holstein. Von der Grenze zur grenzüberschreitenden Region? in M. Krieger, F. Lubowitz and S. B. Frandsen (eds), 1200 Jahre deutsch-dänische Grenze: Aspekte einer Nachbarschaft, pp.295–313. Kiel: Wachholtz Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, V. (2010), ‘ Breaking Points’ But No ‘Broken Border’: Stakeholders Evaluate Border Issues in the Pacific Northwest Region. Border Policy Research Institute Report 10. Western Washington University, BPRI.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, V. (2015), Evolving Canada–United States cross-border mobility in the cascade gateway, Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol.16, pp.121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, V. and Nicol, H. N. (2008), Beyond Walls: Re-inventing the Canada-United States Borderlands. Border Regions Series. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. (2003), The temporalit(ies) of European cross-border governance: euregios and the problem of sens, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.18, No.2, pp.69–85. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2003.9695607
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (ed.) (2012), Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loucky, J., Alper, D. and J. C. Day (eds) (2007), Bio-regions and Coastal Corridors: Transboundary Policy Challenges in the Pacific Border Regions of North America. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marinetto, M. (2003), Governing beyond the centre: a critique of the Anglo-governance school, Political Studies, Vol.51, No.3, pp.592–608. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R. (2004), Governance im modernen Staat, in A. Benz (ed.), Governance Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, pp.65–76. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Morata, F. (2004), La gouvernance coopérative subétatique, in G. Lachapelle and S. Paquin (eds), Mondialisation et gouvernance. Les nouvelles stratégies subétatiques, pp.93–109. Saint-Nicolas, QC: Presses de l’Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Morata, F. and Noferini, A. (2014), Gobernanza y capacidades institucionales en la frontera pirenaica. Working Papers 326. Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, Barcelona, Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J. and Durand, F. (2014), Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol.21, No.1, pp.104–122. doi: 10.1177/0969776411431103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, H. N. and Townsend-Gault, I. (eds) (2005), Holding the Line: Borders in a Global World. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, E. S. (2012), Cultural politics and transboundary resource governance in the Salish Sea, Water Alternatives, Vol.5, No.1, pp.138–160.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (2009), Governance: an ‘empty signifier’? Constellations, Vol.16, No.4, pp.550–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00570.x
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, S. (2004), La paradiplomatie identitaire: Le Québec, la Catalogne et la Flandre en relations internationales, Politique et Sociétés, Vol.23, No.2–3, pp.203–237. doi: 10.7202/010890ar
   Google Scholar
• Payan, T. (2014), Ciudad Juárez: a perfect storm on the US–Mexico border, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.29, No.4, pp.435–447. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2014.982468
   Google Scholar
• Payan, T. (2016), The Three US-Mexico Border Wars: Drugs, Immigration, and Homeland Security: Drugs, Immigration, and Homeland Security. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., Theodore, N. and Brenner, N. (2012), Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the great recession, South Atlantic Quarterly, Vol.111, No.2, pp.265–288. doi: 10.1215/00382876-1548212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2003), Cross-border regions in Europe: significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol.10, No.2, pp.153–171. doi: 10.1177/0969776403010002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007a), Construction of new territorial scales: a framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region, Regional Studies, Vol.41, No.2, pp.253–266. doi: 10.1080/00343400600990517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007b), Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: a comparative study of European cross-border regions, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol.25, No.6, pp.861–879. doi: 10.1068/c60m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikner, T. (2008), Reorganizing cross-border governance capacity: the case of the Helsinki–Tallinn Euregio, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol.15, No.3, pp.211–227. doi: 10.1177/0969776408090414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Policy Research Initiative (Canada). (2006), The Emergence of Cross-border Regions Between Canada and the United States: Roundtables Synthesis Report. Ottawa, ON: Policy Research Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• PNWER (2016a), About Us. Available at http://www.pnwer.org/about-us.html (accessed 24 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• PNWER (2016b), Energy and Environment Working Group, PNWER. Available at http://www.pnwer.org/energy-and-environment.html (accessed 5 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• PNWER (2016c), Energy Horizon Institute, PNWER. Available at http://www.pnwer.org/energyhorizon.html (accessed 5 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• PNWER (2016d), Press Release – PNWER Applauds Passage of the Promoting Travel, Commerce, and National Security Act, PNWER. Available at http://www.pnwer.org/uploads/2/3/2/9/23295822/preclearance_passage_will_expedite_cross-border_travel.pdf (accessed 24 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• PNWER (2017), Border Issues Working Group. PNWER. Available at http://www.pnwer.org/border-issues.html (accessed 24 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Reuters (2017), Exclusive: Trump team seeks agency records on border barriers, surveillance. (January 4). Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-border-trump-exclusive-idUSKBN14N0TY (accessed 24 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (1999), European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism, Regional Studies, Vol.33, No.7, pp.605–617. doi: 10.1080/00343409950078657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (2000), Transboundary cooperation on Germany’s borders: strategic regionalism through multilevel governance, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.15, No.1, pp.143–167. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2000.9695545
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. P. (2010), Paradiplomacy between the U.S. and Canadian provinces: the case of acid rain memoranda of understanding, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.3, No.1, pp.13–38. doi: 10.1080/08865655.1988.9695350
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. J. (2002), Cascading concepts of Cascadia: a territory or a notion, International Journal of Canadian Studies, No.25, pp.113–148.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. (2000), Excavating the future in Cascadia: geoeconomics and the imagined geographies of a cross-border region, BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly, No.27, pp.5–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. (2002), Not a state, but more than a state of mind: cascading Cascadias and the geoeconomics of cross-border regionalism, in M. Perkmann and N.-L. Sum (eds), Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-Border Regions, pp.212–238. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. B. (2006), A neoliberal nexus: economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border, Political Geography, Vol.25, No.2, pp.151–180. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt, K. A. (2008), Gender, governance, and globalization at borders, in G. Waylen and S. Rai (eds), Gender, Governance, and Globalization, pp.234–253. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Staudt, K. A. (2017), Border Politics in a Global Era: Comparative Perspectives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Staudt, K. A. and Cruz, P. L. (2014), ‘Getting It’: Business NGOs and Political Actors Talk about the U.S-Mexico Border Region. Presentation at the international workshop ‘Cross-Border Governance in North America and Europe: Comparative Perspectives’, September 23 and 24, Regina, SK.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2010), Crafting the neoliberal state: workfare, prisonfare, and social insecurity, Sociological Forum, Vol.25, No.2, pp.197–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenberg, B. (ed.) (2015), L’approche pluridisciplinaire de la coopération transfrontalière. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Widdis, R. W. (2015), Looking through the mirror: a historical geographical view of the Canadian–American borderlands, Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol.30, No.2, pp.175–188. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2015.1045921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille, C. (ed.) (2015), Lebenswirklichkeiten und politische Konstruktionen in Grenzregionen. Das Beispiel der Großregion SaarLorLux. Bielefeld: Wirtschaft–Politik–Alltag–Kultur.
   Google Scholar