Empowering through regional funds? The impact of Europe on subnational governance in the Czech Republic

References

• Andreou, G., and I. Bache. 2010. “Europeanization and Multi-Level Governance in Slovenia.” Southeast European & Black Sea Studies 10 (1): 9–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes, Sandrina, and John Loughlin. forthcoming. “The European Union, Subnational Mobilization and State Rescaling in Small Unitary States: A Comparative Analysis.” Regional and Federal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I. 1999. “The Extended Gatekeeper: Central Government and the Implementation of EC Regional Policy in the UK.” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (1): 28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I. 2008. Europeanization and Multi-Level Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., S. George, and R. A. W. Rhodes. 1996. “The European Union, Cohesion Policy, and Subnational Authorities in the United Kingdom.” In Cohesion Policy & European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance, edited by L. Hooghe, 294–319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., and L. De Propris. 2002. “EU Structural Funds, Regional Capabilities and Enlargement: Towards Multi-Level Governance?” Journal of European Integration 24 (4): 303–324.
   Google Scholar
• Baun, M., and D. Marek. 2006. “Regional Policy and Decentralization in the Czech Republic.” Regional & Federal Studies 16 (4): 409–428.
   Google Scholar
• Baun, M., and D. Marek. 2017. “The Limits of Regionalization: The Intergovernmental Struggle Over EU Cohesion Policy in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics & Societies & Cultures 22 (10): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. 2002. States and Regions in the European Union: Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, A. K. 2003. “The Impact of European Integration on Regional Power.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (4): 597–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusis, M. 2014. “Paths and Constraints of Subnational Government Mobilization in East-Central Europe.” Regional & Federal Studies 24 (3): 301–319.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L. 2008. “Multi-Level Governance–the Eastern Version: Emerging Patterns of Regional Developmental Governance in the New Member States.” Regional & Federal Studies 18 (5): 607–627.
   Google Scholar
• Bursens, P. 2007. “State Structures.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by P. Graziano, and M. Vink, 115–127. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bursens, P., and J. Deforche. 2008. “Europeanization of Subnational Polities: The Impact of Domestic Factors on Regional Adaptation to European Integration.” Regional & Federal Studies 18 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J. 2007. “The Three Worlds of Regional Integration Theory.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by P. Graziano, and M. Vink, 23–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M. 2014. “Towards Place-Based Regional and Local Development Strategies in Central and Eastern Europe? EU Cohesion Policy and Strategic Planning Capacity at the Subnational Level.” Local Economy 29 (4–5): 378–393.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., and L. E. Rose. 2005. Comparing Local Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dobre, A. M. 2010. “Europeanization and New Patterns of Multi-Level Governance in Romania.” Southeast European & Black Sea Studies 10 (1): 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. “Empowering Local Authorities in Partner Countries for Enhanced Governance and More Effective Development Outcomes.” Accessed January 8, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/communication-local-authorities-in-partner-countries-com2013280-20130515_en_4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commmission. 2016. “Supporting Decentralization, Local Governance and Local Development through a Territorial Approach.” Accessed January 8, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/mn-bb-16-005-en-n.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farole, T., A. Rodríguez-Pose, and M. Storper. 2011. “Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (5): 1089–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleurke, F., and R. Willemse. 2006. “The European Union and the Autonomy of Subnational Authorities: Towards an Analysis of Constraints and Opportunities in Subnational Decision-Making.” Regional & Federal Studies 16 (1): 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Fleurke, F., and R. Willemse. 2007. “Effects of the European Union on Subnational Decision-Making: Enhancement or Constriction?” European Integration 29 (1): 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. 2002. Four Worlds of Europeanization. ECPR Turin March 22–27. London: LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Hanf, K., and B. Soetendorp. 2014. Adapting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. 2007. “Methodology.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by P. Graziano, and M. Vink, 59–70. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, V. 2015. “The EU Regional Policy in the Czech Republic and Its Impact on European Identification of Czech Citizens.” In EU Regional Policy and the Identification with Europe, edited by J. Tudela, 15–23. Zaragoza: Fundación Manuel Giménez Abad.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” The American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., G. Sasse, and C. Gordon. 2004. Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU’s Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The Myth of Conditionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Illner, M. 2003. “The Czech Republic 1990–2001: Successful Reform at the Municipal Level and a Difficult Birth of the Intermediary Government.” In Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe, edited by H. Baldersheim, M. Illner, and H. Wollman, 61–90. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Illner, M. 2010. “The Voluntary Union of Municipalities: Bottom-up Territorial Consolidation in the Czech Republic?” In Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe, edited by P. Swianiewicz, 219–235. Budapest: Open Society Institute, Local Government & Public Service Reform Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, Ch. 2000. “Subnational Mobilization and European Integration: Does it Make Any Difference?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. 2003. “Meeting the Demands of EU Membership: the Europeanization of National Administrative Systems.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by K. Featherstone, and C. Radaelli, 83–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M., and L. Hooghe. 1996. “Bypassing the Nation-State? Regions and the EU Policy Process.” In European Union: Power and Policy-Making, edited by J. Richardson, and S. Mazey, 445–466. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kull, M., and M. Tatar. 2015. “Multi-Level Governance in a Small State: A Study in Involvement, Participation, Partnership, and Subsidiarity.” Regional & Federal Studies 25 (3): 229–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J. 1996. “Representing Regions in Europe: The Committee of the Regions.” Regional & Federal Studies 6 (2): 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lysek, J., and P. Šaradín. 2017. “Mapping the Success: Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Two Czech Micro-Regions.” In Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe: Institutions and Governance, edited by F. Teles, and P. Swianiewicz, 315–326. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marek, D., and M. Baun. 2002. “The EU as a Regional Actor: The Case of the Czech Republic.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5): 895–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek, D., M. Baun, and M. Dabrowski. 2017. “The Challenge of Implementing European Union Environmental Law in the New Member States: The Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive in the Czech Republic and Poland.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (6): 1117–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G., R. Haesly, and M. Heather. 2002. “What do Subnational Offices Think They are Doing in Brussels?” Regional & Federal Studies 12 (3): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., F. Nielsen, L. Ray, and J. Salk. 1996. “Competencies, Cracks and Conflicts: Regional Mobilization in the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 164–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myant, M., and S. Smith. 2006. “Regional Development and Post-Communist Politics in a Czech Region.” Europe-Asia Studies 58 (2): 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, C. 2006. “Reforming Regional Governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or Domestic Politics as Usual?” East European Politics & Societies 20 (2): 219–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, M. 2017. “Czech Republic: Regional Elections Without Regional Politics.” In Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe Territoriality of the Vote in Ten Countries, edited by A. H. Schakel, 83–104. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pitschel, D., and M. Bauer. 2009. “Subnational Governance Approaches on the Rise-Reviewing a Decade of Eastern European Regionalization Research.” Regional & Federal Studies 19 (3): 327–347.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C., and R. Pasquier. 2007. “Conceptual Issues.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by P. Graziano, and M. Vink, 35–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., M. G. Cowles, and J. Caporaso. 2001. “Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction.” In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, edited by M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso, and T. Risse, 1–20. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, C. 2011. Regional Representations in the EU: Between Diplomacy and Interest Mediation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmilian.
   Google Scholar
• Ryšavý, D. 2013. “Czech Counties after a Dozen Years of Regionalization: Continuity and Novelties after County Elections 2012.” Regional & Federal Studies 23 (5): 631–642.
   Google Scholar
• Ryšavý, D. 2016. “Career Politicians a Dozen Years after Regionalization of the Czech Republic (2000–13).” The Journal of Legislative Studies 22 (1): 54–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šaradín, P., and T. Šulák. 2016. “Local Action Groups and Participation: Research Note.” Comterporary European Studies 2015 (2): 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Scherpereel, J. A. 2007. “Subnational Authorities in the EU's Post-Socialist States: Joining the Multi-Level Polity?” Journal of European Integration 29 (1): 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Scherpereel, J. A. 2010. “EU Cohesion Policy and the Europeanization of Central and East European Regions.” Regional & Federal Studies 20 (1): 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2007. “Candidate Countries and Conditionality.” In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, edited by P. Graziano, and M. Vink, 88–101. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 1999. “The EU and its Member States: Institutional Contrasts and their Consequences.” MPIfG paper, 99/7.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2003. “The Europeanization of Governance in Larger European Democracies.” EUSA conference Paper, Nashville, Tennessee, March 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P. 2010. “If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution? An East European Perspective.” Local Government Studies 36 (2): 183–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, M. 2010. “With or Without You’? Revisiting Territorial State-Bypassing in EU Interest Representation.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (1): 76–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, M. 2014. “Same Game but More Players? Subnational Lobbying in an Enlarged Union.” Regional & Federal Studies 24 (3): 341–361.
   Google Scholar
• Tatham, M. 2017. “Networkers, Fund Hunters, Intermediaries, or Policy Players? The Activities of Regions in Brussels.” West European Politics 40 (5): 1088–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajdová, Z. 2011. “Dva prostory participace.” In Spolupráce, partnerství a participace v místní veřejné správě: Význam, praxe, příslib, edited by D. Čermák, and J. Vobecká, 47–58. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
   Google Scholar