Strange bedfellows: Federal systems and performance management

References

• Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers, Public Administration Review.” Special Issue 66 (s1): 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2003. “Inside the Matrix: Integrating the Paradigms of Intergovernmental and Network Management.” International Journal of Public Administration 26 (12): 1401–1422.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., and B. Radin. 2015. “Deil Wright’s Overlapping Model of Intergovernmental Relations: The Basis for Intergovernmental Relationships.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 45 (1): 139–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2002. “Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?.” Administration & Society 34 (1): 32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2014. “The Multiple Facets of Co-production: Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and G. A. Brewer. 2013. “Social Capital, Management Capacity and Public Service Performance.” Public Management Review 15 (1): 19–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arah, O. A., G. P. Westert, J. Hurst, and N. S. Klazinga. 2006. “A Conceptual Framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 18 (Suppl. 1): 5–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, C. K. 2013. “A Dynamic Defense of Cooperative Federalism.” Whittier Law Review 35: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bakvis, H., and D. Brown. 2010. “Policy Coordination in Federal Systems: Comparing Intergovernmental Processes and Outcomes in Canada and the United States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 484–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M. 2015. How to Run a Government: so That Citizens Benefit and Taxpayers Don't go Crazy. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. 2009. “Intergovernmental Relations in German Federalism-Joint Decision-Making and the Dynamics of Horizontal Cooperation.” In Seminario internacional la federalización en España: Los déficit de la cooperación intergubernamental, 1–28. Zaragoza: Fundación Manuel Giménez Abad de Estudios Parlamentarios y del Estado Autonómico.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, G., and C. Hood. 2006. “What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System.” Public Administration 84 (3): 517–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., A. Lecours, G. P. Marchildon, H. Mou, and M. R. Olfert. 2017. Fiscal Federalism and Equalization Policy in Canada: Political and Economic Dimensions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blöndal, J. 2005. “Market-type Mechanisms and the Provision of Public Services.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 5 (1): 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., and J. Halligan. 2008. Managing Performance: International Comparisons. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., and J. Halligan. 2011. “Managing Performance Across Levels of Government: Lessons Learned or Reproducing Disconnects?” In Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations, edited by E. Ongaro, A. Massey, M. Holzer, and E. Wayenberg, 236–254. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2012. “From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1119–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., C. Farrell, and J. Law. 2003. Evaluating Public Management Reforms: Principles and Practice. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., J. Gould-Williams, J. Law, and R. Walker. 2002. “Plans, Performance Information Accountability: The Case of Best Value.” Public Administration 80 (4): 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breton, A. 1987. “Towards a Theory of Competitive Federalism.” European Journal of Political Economy 3 (1–2): 263–329.
   Google Scholar
• Broadway, R., and A. Shah. 2009. Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multi Order Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broucker, B., K. De Wit, and L. Leisyte. 2015. “ An Evaluation of New Public Management in Higher Education: Same Rationale, Different Implementation.” EAIR 37th Annual Forum in Krems, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., and R. Simeon. 2002. “Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: The Emergence of Collaborative Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 32 (2): 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clovis Jr, S. 2006. “Federalism, Homeland Security and National Preparedness: A Case Study in the Development of Public Policy.” Homeland Security Affairs 2 (3): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cremer, D., and T. Tyler. 2007. “The Effects of Trust in Authority and Procedural Fairness on Cooperation.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (3): 639–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafflon, B., and F. Vaillancourt. 2003. “Problems of Equalisation in Federal Systems.” In Federalism in a Changing World–Learning from Each Other, edited by R. Blindenbacher et A. Koller, 395–411. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. F. 1978. The Federal Principle: A Journey Through in Quest of Meaning. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., and R. B. Denhardt. 2015. “The New Public Service Revisited.” Public Administration Review 75 (5): 664–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. J. 1990. “Three Paradoxes of Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 1 (3): 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dobell, R., and L. Bernier. 1997. “Citizen-Centred Governance: Implications for Inter-Governmental Canada.” In Alternative Service Delivery: Sharing Governance in Canada, edited by Robin Ford and David Zussman, 250–265. Toronto: IPAC/KPMG.
   Google Scholar
• Duchacek, I. 1971. Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. New York: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erk, J. 2010. Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erk, J., and W. Swenden. 2010. New Directions in Federalism Studies. Florence, KY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fafard, P. 2013. “Intergovernmental Accountability and Healthcare: Reflections on the Recent Canadian Experience.” In Overpromising and Underperforming: Understanding and Evaluating New Intergovernmental Accountability Regimes, edited by P. Graefe, J. Simmons, and L. White, 31–55. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenna, A. 2012. “Federalism and Intergovernment Coordination.” In The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, 750–763. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fuertes, V., B. Jantz, T. Klenk, and R. McQuaid. 2014. “Between Cooperation and Competition: The Organisation of Employment Service Delivery in the UK and Germany.” International Journal of Social Welfare 23: S71–S86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galligan, B. 2008. “Processes for Reforming Australian Federalism.” UNSW Law Journal 31: 617–643.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, P., J. Simmons, and L. White. 2013. Overpromising and Underperforming: Understanding and Evaluating New Intergovernmental Accountability Regimes. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., and E. Care2014. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hueglin, T. O., and A. Fenna. 2006. Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry. Ontario: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. L., and P. B. Mortensen. 2016. “Rules and the Doctrine of Performance Management.” Public Administration Review 76 (2): 302–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz, B., T. Klenk, F. Larsen, and J. Wiggan. 2018. “Marketization and Varieties of Accountability Relationships in Employment Services: Comparing Denmark, Germany, and Great Britain.” Administration & Society 50 (3): 321–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. 2018. Cities Responding to Climate Change: Stockholm, Copenhagen and Tokyo. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., and G. Bouckaert. 2017. “Performance for Accountability: The Case of Joint Agreements in a Federal System.” Public Performance & Management Review 40 (4): 765–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, G., and M. Proulx. 1992. “Le chevauchement des programmes fédéraux et provinciaux: un bilan.” Canadian Public Administration 35 (3): 402–420.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. 1997. “The Global Revolution in Public Management: Driving Themes, Missing Links.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16 (3): 446–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. 2011. “Historical and Theoretical Foundations of Federalism.” In Federalism: Historical and Theoretical Foundations of Federalism, edited by John Kincaid, 1–15. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. 2009. “ Do Quasi-markets Foster Innovation in Education? A Comparative Perspective.” OECD Education Working Papers, No. 25. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/221583463325.
   Google Scholar
• Maioni, A. 1998. Parting at the Crossroads: the Emergence of Health Insurance in the United States and Canada. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., and P. Wohlstetter. 2013. “Recent Trends in Intergovernmental Relations.” Educational Researcher 42 (5): 276–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. 2006. “Government Accountability for Outsourced Services.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 65 (2): 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshkova, M. I., and H. Guo. 2012. “Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2): 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., and T. M. Koontz. 2014. “Multi-level Governance, Policy Implementation and Participation: The EU’s Mandated Participatory Planning Approach to Implementing Environmental Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (2): 248–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3): 1120–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. 2008. “On the Evolution of Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Institutions.” National Tax Journal 61 (2): 313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Public-Private Partnerships: In Pursuit of Risk Sharing and Value for Money. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Together for Better Public Services: Partnering with Citizens and Civil Society. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/10.1787/9789264118843-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. “ Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators.” OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2013-en.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming Government. Reading, MA: Adison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and K. McLaughlin. 2004. “The Cross-Cutting Review of the Voluntary Sector: Where Next for Local Government – Voluntary Sector Relationships?” Regional Studies 38 (5): 571–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and K. Strokosch. 2013. “It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Coproduction of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives.” British Journal of Management 24: S31–S41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M. 1996. “The Council of Australian Governments and Intergovernmental Relations: A Case of Cooperative Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 26 (2): 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M. 2001. “Multi-level Governance and the Emergence of Collaborative Federal Institutions in Australia.” Policy and Politics 29 (2): 137–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2013. “Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Crucial Conceptual Issues.” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector, and Co-production, edited by V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere, 31–52. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis- New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. 2000. “The Government Performance and Results Act and the Tradition of Federal Management Reform: Square Pegs in Round Holes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (1): 111–135.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M., L. Biondi, R. Gomes, A. Melo, F. Ohemeng, G. Perez-Lopez, A. Rossi, and W. Sutiyono. 2012. “Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 61 (3): 235–271.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, K. J. 2000. “Assessment, League Tables and School Effectiveness: Consider the Issues and ‘Let’s get Real!’.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 1 (1): 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C. 2002. “Collaborative Federalism.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 61 (2): 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., and J. Mayne. 2005. “Assuring the Quality of Evaluative Information: Theory and Practice.” Evaluation and Program Planning 28 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. 2013. “Fiscal Federalism and the Political Economy of Territorial Finance.” In Routledge Handbook of Regionalism & Federalism, edited by J. Loughlin, J. Kincaid, and W. Swenden, 109–131. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., E. Guarini, A. Sancino, M. Andreani, and R. Ruffini. 2016. “Public Services Management and Co-production in Multi-Level Governance Settings.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 8–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeon, R., and B. Radin. 2010. “Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. M. 2017. “Canadian Multilateral Intergovernmental Institutions and the Limits of Institutional Innovation.” Regional & Federal Studies 27 (5): 573–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., A. Anell, R. Busse, L. Crivelli, J. Healy, A. Lindahl, G. Westert, and T. Kene. 2012. “Leadership and Governance in Seven Developed Health Systems.” Health Policy 106 (1): 37–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbott, J. A., and S. Sharfstein. 1986. “A Proposal for Future Funding of Chronic and Episodic Mental Illness.” Psychiatric Services 37 (11): 1126–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N. 2015. “Collaboration in Federal Hydropower Licensing: Impacts on Process, Outputs, and Outcomes.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (4): 578–606. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., and F. Leeuw. 2002. “The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector.” Public Performance and Management Review 25 (3): 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., B. Verschuere, and J. Voets. 2015. “ Benefits and Risks of Co-production: A Preliminary Literature Review.” Paper presented and the IIAS Conference on co-production of public services, Nijmegen, June.
   Google Scholar
• Vodden, K. 2015. “Governing Sustainable Coastal Development: The Promise and Challenge of Collaborative Governance in Canadian Coastal Watersheds.” The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 59 (2): 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. 1998. “Federalism, Federal Political Systems, and Federations.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. 2008. Comparing Federal Systems. 3rd ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weibust, I. 2009. Green Leviathan: The Case for a Federal Role in Environmental Policy. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Wheare, K. C. 1963. Federal Government. New York: Oxford University Press, 4th edition.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, K. 2013. “ Adaptive and Efficient Federalisms, in CEDA. Adjusting Australia: Optimising national prosperity, Melbourne.” Committee for the Economic Development of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. F., and M. Holzer. 2006. “The Performance-Trust Link: Implications for Performance Measurement.” Public Administration Review 66 (1): 114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. F. 2001. “National-state Relations: Cooperative Federalism in the Twentieth Century.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 31 (2): 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar