The dynamics of federalism, subnational markets and trade policy-making in Canada and the US

References

• Abel, Albert S. 1941. “The Commerce Clause in the Constitutional Convention and in Contemporary Comment.” Minnesota Law Review 25 (432): 443–444.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Seungjoo Lee, eds. 2010. Trade Policy in the Asia-Pacific: The Role of Ideas, Interests, and Domestic Institutions. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Greg. 2012. Internal Markets and Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anglin, Howard. 2017. “Canadian Leaders are Big Talkers on Free Trade. But What about Within Our Own Borders?” Opinion, CBC News. Accessed July 18, 2017. http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/canadian-trade-barriers-1.4025211.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, Richard. 2011. “21st Century Regionalism: Filling the Gap between 21st Century Trade and 20th Century Trade Rules.” WTO Staff Working Paper, No. ERSD-2011-08.
   Google Scholar
• de Beer, Jeremy. 2012. “Implementing International Trade Agreements in Federal Systems: A Look at the Canada–EU CETA’s Intellectual Property Issues.” Legal Issues of Economic Integration 39 (1): 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, Yves, Nils Gheyle, and Ferdi de Ville. 2016. “The Paradox of National Parliaments’ Involvement in EU Trade Policy After the Lisbon Treaty: The Case of Belgium.” In Paper Presented at the Workshop The Multilevel Politics of Trade. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University.
   Google Scholar
• Broschek, Jorg. 2015. “Pathways of Federal Reform: Australia, Canada, Germany and Switzerland.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 45 (1): 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broschek, Jorg, and Patricia Goff. 2019. “The Evolution of Multilevel Trade Politics.” In The Multilevel Politics of Trade: Configurations, Patterns and Dynamics, edited by P. Goff, and J. Broschek, 3–26. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Douglas. 2002. Market Rules: Economic Union Reform and Intergovernmental Policymaking in Canada and Australia. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camissa, Anne-Marie. 2005. Governments as Interest Groups: Intergovernmental Lobbying and the Federal System. Westport, CT: Prager.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Senate. 2016. “Tear Down these Walls”. Senate Banking Committee, June. https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/421/BANC/Reports/2016-06-13_BANC_FifthReport_SS-.
   Google Scholar
• da Conceição-Heldt, Eugénia. 2013. “Two-Level Games and Trade Cooperation: What Do We Now Know?” International Politics 50 (4): 579–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, Stephen. 2002. “Canadian North American Provinces, and US States Integration: Bench Warmers or Key Players?” Institute for Research on Public Policy, Choices (new York, N Y ) 8 (4): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Christina. 2009. “Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, Laura. 2012. Can Canada Join the TPP? Why Just Wanting is not Enough. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute No 340.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, Ferdi. 2012. “European Union Regulatory Politics in the Shadow of the WTO: WTO Rules as Frame of Reference and Rhetorical Device.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5): 700–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delagran, Leslie. 1992. “Conflict in Trade Policy: The Role of the Congress and the Provinces in Negotiating and Implementing the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 22 (4): 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Erman, Valerie. 2016. “Comparative Intergovernmental Politics: CETA Negotiations between Canada and the EU.” Politics and Governance 4 (3): 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doern, G. Bruce, and Mark MacDonald. 1999. Free Trade Federalism: Negotiating the Canadian Agreement on Internal Trade. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, Michelle. 2015. Single Markets: Economic Integration in the Europe and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, Michelle. 2019 (Forthcoming). “Multilevel Trade in the US: Federalism, Internal Markets and Intergovernmental Relations.” In The Multilevel Politics of Trade: Configurations, Patterns and Dynamics, edited by P. Goff, and T. J. Broschek. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, Barry, and Douglas A. Irwin. 2010. “The Slide to Protectionism in the Great Depression: Who Succumbed and Why?” The Journal of Economic History 70 (4): 871–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsig, Manfred, Bernard M. Hoekman, and Joost Pauwelyn. 2016. “Thinking About the Performance of the World Trade Organization: A Discussion across Disciplines.” EUI Working Paper, 8/2016 Florence.
   Google Scholar
• Fafard, Patrick, and Patrick Leblond. 2013. “Closing the Deal: What Role for the Provinces in the Final Stages of the CETA Negotiations?” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 68 (4): 553–559.
   Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, Christian. 2017. “More Voice, Less Exit: Sub-Federal Resistance to International Procurement Liberalization in the European Union, the United States and Canada.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 1686–1705.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, Alexandre, and Michael Holden. 2010. Canada-European Union Negotiations. Parliamentary and Research Library, In Brief Series. Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, Patricia M. 2016. “Canadian Trade Negotiations in an Era of Deep Integration.” CIGI Papers No. 88.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, Patricia M. 2017. “Limits to Deep Integration: Canada between the EU and the US.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30 (5–6): 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, Michael. 2002. A Trading Nation: Canadian Trade Policy from Colonialism to Globalization. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinarejos, Alicia. 2012. “Free Movement, Federalism, and Institutional Choice: A Canada-EU Comparison.” Cambridge Law Journal 71 (3): 537–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, Bernard M., and Carlos Primo Braga. 2016. The Future of the Global Trade Order. Global Governance Programme. Florence: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Lars, Craig Parsons, and Benedikt Springer. 2017. “Hayek, Polanyi and Single Markets: Or How Europe’s Single Market Surpassed America’s.” Paper presented at the EUSA biennial conference, Miami.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGPAC. 2004. Recommendations for Improving Federal-State Policy Coordination Memo. August.
   Google Scholar
• Interview. 2016. Interview Conducted with a Representative of the US Trade Association. Washington DC, April.
   Google Scholar
• Interview. 2018. Interview Conducted with a Former Canadian Trade Negotiator. Washington DC, March.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Soo Yeon. 2015. “Deep Integration and Regional Trade Agreements.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade, edited by Lisa L. Martin, 360–379. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, John. 1999. “The International Competence of US States and Their Local Governments.” Regional & Federal Studies 9 (1): 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, Morris. 2006. Licensing Occupations: Ensuring Quality or Restricting Competition? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kukucha, Christopher. 2008. The Provinces and Canadian Foreign Trade Policy. Vancouver, Toronto: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kukucha, Christopher. 2011. “Provincial Pitfalls: Canadian Provinces and the Canada-EU Trade Negotiations.” In Europe, Canada and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, edited by Kurt Hübner, 130–150. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kukucha, Christopher. 2013. “Canadian Sub-Federal Governments and CETA: Overarching Themes and Future Trends.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 68 (4): 528–535.
   Google Scholar
• Kukucha, Christopher. 2017. “Federalism and Liberalization: Evaluating the Impact of American and Canadian Sub-Federal Governments on the Negotiation of International Trade Agreements.” International Negotiation 22 (2): 259–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblond, Patrick. 2016. “Making the Most of CETA: A Complete and Effective Implementation is Key to Realizing the Agreement’s full Potential.” CIGI Papers No. 114.
   Google Scholar
• Lequesne, Christian, and Stéphane Paquin. 2017. “Federalism, Paradiplomacy and Foreign Policy: A Case of Mutual Neglect.” International Negotiation 22: 183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, John. 1995. “National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns.” The American Economic Review 85 (3): 615–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, Sophie. 2000. “What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU–U.S. Trade Negotiations.” International Organization 54 (1): 103–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, Sophie. 2005. Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, Sophie, and Kalypso Nicolaïdis. 2006. “The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 906–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Timothy. 2017. “Local Liability in International Economic Law.” North Carolina Law Review 95 (2): 261–338.
   Google Scholar
• Omiunu, Ohio. 2017. “The Evolving Role of Sub-National Actors in International Trade Interactions: A Comparative Analysis of Belgium and Canada.” Global Journal of Comparative Law 6 (2): 105–137.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, Stéphane. 2013. “Federalism and the Governance of International Trade Negotiations in Canada: Comparing CUSFTA with CETA.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 68 (4): 545–552.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, Stéphane. 2017. “Fédéralisme et négociations commerciales au Canada : l’Alé, l’aecg et le ptp Comparés.” Études Internationales 48 (3–4): 347–369.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 2000. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” Governance 13 (4): 475–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, S. A., and Elenor Back. 1941. The Rowell-Sirois Commission. Toronto: Ryerson Press: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Sbragia, Alberta. 2012. “Multi-level Governance and Comparative Regionalism.” In Handbook of Multilevel Governance, edited by Henrik Enderlein, Sonja Wälti, and Michael Zürn, 160–195. Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Mathew. 2001. “Conscientious State Legislators and the Cultures of Compliance and Liberalization Relating to International Trade Agreements.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law 95 (4–7): 52–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25659454.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, Robert. 2017. From International to Federal Market: The Changing Structure of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, Julie. 2017. “Canadian Multilateral Intergovernmental Institutions and the Limits of Institutional Innovation.” Regional and Federal Studies 27 (5): 573–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solís, Mireya. 2010. “Can FTAs Deliver Market Liberalization in Japan? A Study on Domestic Political Determinants.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (2): 209–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, George R., Edgar L. Burtis, and Frederick V. Waugh. 1939. Barriers to Internal Trade in Farm Products. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, Charles. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trew, Stuart. 2013. “Correcting the Democratic Deficit in the CETA Negotiations: Civil Society Engagement in the Provinces, Municipalities, and Europe.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 68 (4): 568–575.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, David. 1997. “Trading Up and Governing Across: Transnational Governance and Environmental Protection.” Journal of European Public Policy 4 (4): 556–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, Conrad. 1994. “Foreign Trade Agreements: A New Federal Partner?” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 24 (3): 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, Conrad. 2012. “The United States of America.” In Internal Markets and Multi-Level Governance, edited by George Anderson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, Barry. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11 (1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock, Stephen. 2011. “European Union Trade Policy: The Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Towards a New Generation of FTAs?” In Europe, Canada and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, edited by Kurt Hübner, 21–40. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Alasdair. 2016. “Not Your Parents’ Trade Politics: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations.” Review of International Political Economy 23 (3): 345–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Joseph A. 2013. Interstate Cooperation Agreements: Compacts and Administrative Agreements. 2nd ed. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar