Reforming autonomy? The fiscal impact of the Swiss federal reform 2008

References

• Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller. 2010. “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (490): 493–505. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller. 2011. “Synth: An R Package for Synthetic Control Methods in Comparative Case Studies.” Journal of Statistical Software 42 (13): 1–17. doi: 10.18637/jss.v042.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller. 2015. “Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (2): 495–510. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, T., and I. Stadelmann-Steffen. 2017. “How Federalism Influences Welfare Spending: Belgium Federalism Reform Through the Perspective of the Synthetic Control Method.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (3): 680–702. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednar, J. 2009. The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, J. 2013. “Constitutional Change in Federations: The Role of Complementary Institutions.” In Federal Dynamics. Continuity, Change and the Varieties of Federalism, edited by A. Benz and J. Broschek, 277–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, N. 2010. “Föderalismusreform in Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich.” In Föderalismusreform in Deutschland, edited by J. von Blumenthal and S. Bröchler, 37–58. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, N., and S. Kropp. 2016. “Arraying Institutional Layers in Federalism Reforms: Lessons From the German Case.” Regional & Federal Studies 26 (5): 585–602. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2016.1236026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnke, N., B. Petersohn, A. Fischer-Hotzel, and D. Heinz. 2011. “Measuring Success of Constitutional Reforms: Evidence From Territorial Reforms in Eight Western Democracies.” Regional & Federal Studies 21 (4-5): 447–477. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2011.578935
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and A. Lecours. 2018. “Federalism, Policy Change, and Social Security in Belgium: Explaining the Decentralization of Family Allowances in the Sixth State Reform.” Journal of European Social Policy 28 (1): 55–69. doi: 10.1177/0958928717700563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., A. Lecours, G. P. Marchildon, H. Mou, and R. Olfert. 2017. Fiscal Federalism and Equalization Policy in Canada: Political and Economic Dimensions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. 2013a. “Balancing Rigidity and Flexibility: Constitutional Dynamics in Federal Systems.” West European Politics 36 (4): 726–749. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.783346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A. 2013b. “Dimensions and Dynamics of Federal Regimes.” In Federal Dynamics. Continuity, Change and the Varieties of Federalism, edited by A. Benz and J. Broschek, 70–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. 2016. “Gradual Constitutional Change and Federal Dynamics – German Federalism Reform in Historical Perspective.” Regional & Federal Studies 26 (5): 707–728. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2016.1226813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., and J. Broschek. 2013. “Federal Dynamics: Introduction.” In Federal Dynamics. Continuity, Change and the Varieties of Federalism, edited by A. Benz and J. Broschek, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A., and C. Colino. 2011. “Constitutional Change in Federations—a Framework for Analysis.” Regional & Federal Studies 21 (4-5): 381–406. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2011.578886
   Google Scholar
• Blöchliger, H., and D. King. 2006. Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-Central Governments. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D. 2008. “Verfassungsänderung trotz vieler Veto-Spieler: Föderalismusreform in der Schweiz.” In Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie, edited by T. Bräuninger, S. Shikano, and J. Behnke, 87–118. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D. 2009. “Constitutional Change in Switzerland.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39 (2): 314–340. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjn036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broschek, J. 2013. “Between Path Dependence and Gradual Change: Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Federal Dynamics.” In Federal Dynamics. Continuity, Change and the Varieties of Federalism, edited by A. Benz and J. Broschek, 93–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broschek, J. 2014. “Pathways of Federal Reform: Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 45 (1): 51–76. doi: 10.1093/publius/pju030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broschek, J., B. Petersohn, and S. Toubeau. 2018. “Territorial Politics and Institutional Change: A Comparative-Historical Analysis.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 48 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjx059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brülhart, M., and K. Schmidheiny. 2013. NFA, Steuerwettbewerb und Mobilität der Steuerzahler: Studie zum Zweiten Wirksamkeitsbericht NFA. Accessed August 20, 2017. https://www.efv.admin.ch/efv/de/home/themen/finanzausgleich/wirksamkeitsberichte.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelletti, F., M. Fischer, and P. Sciarini. 2014. “‘Let’s Talk Cash’: Cantons’ Interests and the Reform of Swiss Federalism.” Regional & Federal Studies 24 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2013.808627
   Google Scholar
• Dafflon, B. 2004. Federal-Cantonal Equalisation in Switzerland: An Overview of the Present System and Reform in Progress. Working Paper No 356. Fribourg: BENEFRI Centre d’Études en Économie du Secteur Public (CÉÉP), Université de Fribourg.
   Google Scholar
• Dardanelli, P., and S. Mueller. 2019. “Dynamic De/Centralization in Switzerland, 1848–2010.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism Early View 49 (1): 138–165. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjx056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, K., and M. Reuchamps. 2013. “The Belgian Federation at a Crossroad.” Regional & Federal Studies 23 (3): 261–270. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2013.773896
   Google Scholar
• Federal Council. 2001. “Botschaft zur Neugestaltung des Finanzausgleichs und der Aufgaben zwischen Bund und Kantonen (NFA) vom 14.” November 2011, 01.074. Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Council. 2004. Volksabstimmung vom 28. November 2004: Erläuterungen des Bundesrates. Accessed August 20, 2017. https://www.bk.admin.ch/themen/pore/va/20041128/index.html?lang=de.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Council. 2010. Bericht über die Wirksamkeit des Finanzausgleichs zwischen Bund und Kantonen 2008– 2011. Accessed August 20, 2017. https://www.admin.ch/ch/d/gg/pc/documents/1855/Vorlage1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Council. 2014. Wirksamkeitsbericht 2012–2015 des Finanzausgleichs zwischen Bund und Kantonen. Accessed August 20, 2017. http://www.kdk.ch/fileadmin/files/Themen/NFA_und_interkantonale_Zusammenarbeit/Bericht_Maerz_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, R., and G. Wettstein. 2008. Reform des schweizerischen Finanzausgleichs. Basel: CREMA - Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, J., and P. Cannoot. 2015. “Belgian Federalism after the Sixth State Reform.” Perspectives on Federalism 7 (2): 29–55. doi: 10.1515/pof-2015-0009
   Google Scholar
• Hines, J. R., and R. H. Thaler. 1995. “Anomalies: The Flypaper Effect.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 217–226. doi: 10.1257/jep.9.4.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and A. H. Schakel. 2008. “Operationalizing Regional Authority: A Coding Scheme for 42 Countries, 1950–2006.” Regional & Federal Studies 18 (2–3): 123–142. doi: 10.1080/13597560801979480
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and A. H. Schakel. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Countries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, E., C. Ragin, J. D. Stephens, D. Brady, and J. Beckfield. 2004. Comparative Welfare States Data Set. Northwestern University, University of North Carolina, Duke University and Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Hueglin, T. O., and A. Fenna. 2015. Comparative Federalism. A Systematic Inquiry. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2017. Government Finance Statistics (GFS). Accessed October 10, 2017. http://www.imf.org/en/Data.
   Google Scholar
• Kropp, S., and N. Behnke. 2016. “Marble Cake Dreaming of Layer Cake: The Merits and Pitfalls of Disentanglement in German Federalism Reform.” Regional & Federal Studies 26 (5): 667–686. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2016.1236335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., L. Hooghe, and A. H. Schakel. 2008. “Measuring Regional Authority.” Regional & Federal Studies 18 (2-3): 111–121. doi: 10.1080/13597560801979464
   Google Scholar
• Mathys, L. 2015. “The Swiss Reform of the Allocation of Tasks: The Conventions-Programs as a New Partnership Model for Vertical Relations?” Federal Governance 12 (1): 26–60. doi: 10.24908/fg.v12i1.5497
   Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. 2002. “The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance Around the World.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 670–687. doi: 10.2307/3088407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. 2004. “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement.” Comparative Politics 36: 481–499. doi: 10.2307/4150172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. A., G. S. Eskeland, and J. Litvack. 2003. Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaltegger, C. A., R. Hofmann, and Z. Huwyler. 2015. “Finanzausgleich im Praxistest – eine Fallstudie aus dem Kanton Basel-Landschaft.” Die Volkwirtschaft. Das Magazin für Wirtschaftspolitik 1–2: 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. 2007. “Introduction: Principles of Fiscal Federalism.” In The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives, edited by A. Shah, 3–42. Montreal: McGill-Queens’ University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, C. K. 2012. “Beyond Gaps and Imbalances: Re-Structuring the Debate on Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations.” Public Administration 90 (1): 99–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01947.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegarescu, D. 2005. “Public Sector Decentralisation: Measurement Concepts and Recent International Trends.” Fiscal Studies 26 (3): 301–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenden, W., and M. T. Jans. 2006. “‘Will It Stay or Will It Go?’ Federalism and the Sustainability of Belgium.” West European Politics 29 (5): 877–894. doi: 10.1080/01402380600968745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. 2018. Swiss Federalism: The Transformation of a Federal Model. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verdonck, M., and K. Deschouwer. 2003. “Patterns and Principles of Fiscal Federalism in Belgium.” Regional & Federal Studies 13 (4): 91–110. doi: 10.1080/13597560308559447
   Google Scholar
• Wasserfallen, F. 2015. “The Cooperative Capacity of Swiss Federalism.” Swiss Political Science Review 21 (4): 538–555. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar