Local autonomy and national–local turnout gap: Higher stakes, higher turnout?

References

• Blais, A. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A. 2006. “What Affects Voter Turnout?” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 111–125. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and A. Dobrzynska. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33 (2): 239–262. doi:10.1023/a:1006802916256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R. H. 1974. “Socio-economic Determinism of Voting Turnout: A Challenge.” The Journal of Politics 36 (3): 731–752. doi:10.2307/2129253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breux, S., J. Couture, and R. Koop. 2017. “Turnout in Local Elections: Evidence from Canadian Cities, 2004–2014.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 699–722. doi:10.1017/s000842391700018x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42: 264–275. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. E. Mouritzen, and L. E. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H., and P. Manow. 2018. “Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies.” Development Version. On-line Resource: http://www.parlgov.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Frandsen, A. G. 2002. “Size and Electoral Participation in Local Elections.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (6): 853–869. doi:10.1068/c0228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, S. N., I. Lago, A. Blais, E. Gidengil, and T. Gschwend. 2017. Multi-Level Electoral Politics: Beyond the Second-Order Election Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M. 1995. “Autonomy and City Limits.” In Theories of Urban Politics, edited by D. Judge, G. Stocker, and H. Wolman, 228–252. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harguindéguy, J. B. P., A. Cole, and R. Pasquier. 2019. “The Variety of Decentralization Indexes: A Review of the Literature.” Regional & Federal Studies 1–24. doi:10.1080/13597566.2019.1566126.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, A., I. McLean, B. Taylor, and J. Curtice. 1999. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389–414. doi:10.1023/a:1006924510899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., and N. McEwen. 2010. “A Comparative Analysis of Voter Turnout in Regional Elections.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 405–416. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., and N. McEwen. 2014. “Regions as Primary Political Communities: A Multi-Level Comparative Analysis of Turnout in Regional Elections.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 45 (2): 189–215. doi:10.1093/publius/pju040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., and M. Marsh. 2011. “Second-Order Effects Plus Pan-European Political Swings: An Analysis of European Parliament Elections Across Time.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 4–15. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Martinot, V., C. Rallings, and M. Thrasher. 1996. “Comparing Local Electoral Turnout in Great Britain and France: More Similarities Than Differences?” European Journal of Political Research 30 (2): 241–257. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00676.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and A. H. Schakel. 2016. Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Y. 2005. Institutions, Incentives and Electoral Participation in Japan: Cross-Level and Cross-National Perspectives. Abingdon: RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanyna, M., and A. Shah. 2014. “How Close Is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and Decentralization.” Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 8 (2014–3): 1. doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., and N. Keuffer. 2018. “Creating an Index of Local Autonomy – Theoretical, Conceptual, and Empirical Issues.” Regional & Federal Studies, 1–26. doi:10.1080/13597566.2018.1464443.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., N. Keuffer, and H. Baldersheim. 2016. “Measuring Local Autonomy in 39 Countries (1990–2014).” Regional & Federal Studies 26 (3): 321–357. doi:10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., N. Keuffer, H. Baldersheim, N. Hlepas, P. Swianiewicz, K. Steyvers, and C. Navarro. 2019. Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J., and P. van Aelst. 2014. “First-Order, Second-Order or Third-Rate? A Comparison of Turnout in European, Local and National Elections in the Netherlands.” Electoral Studies 35: 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J., F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström, eds. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marien, S., R. Dassonneville, and M. Hooghe. 2015. “How Second Order Are Local Elections? Voting Motives and Party Preferences in Belgian Municipal Elections.” Local Government Studies 41 (6): 898–916. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1048230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, M. 2003. “Why Bother? Determinants of Turnout in the European Elections.” Electoral Studies 22 (3): 449–468. doi:10.1016/s0261-3794(01)00054-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, I., A. Heath, and B. Taylor. 1996. “Were the 1994 Euro- and Local Elections in Britain Really Second-Order? Evidence from the British Election Panel Study.” British Elections and Parties Yearbook 6 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/13689889608412969.
   Google Scholar
• Morlan, R. L. 1984. “Municipal vs. National Election Voter Turnout: Europe and the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (3): 457–470. doi:10.2307/2149943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., S. E. Ha, and Z. Callen. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, G., and B. Grofman. 1984. “To Vote or Not to Vote: The Paradox of Nonvoting.” Public Choice 42 (3): 311–325. doi:10.1007/bf00124949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percival, G. L., M. Currin-Percival, S. Bowler, and H. van der Kolk. 2007. “Taxing, Spending, and Voting: Voter Turnout Rates in Statewide Elections in Comparative Perspective.” State and Local Government Review 39 (3): 131–143. doi:10.1177/0160323x0703900302.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H., and P. C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 25–42. doi:10.2307/1953324 doi: 10.1017/S000305540011562X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, L. E. 2002. “Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (6): 829–851. doi: 10.1068/c0227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H. 2014. “How to Analyze Second-Order Election Effects? A Refined Second-Order Election Model.” Comparative European Politics 13 (6): 636–655. doi:10.1057/cep.2014.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H., and R. Dandoy. 2014. “Electoral Cycles and Turnout in Multilevel Electoral Systems.” West European Politics 37 (3): 605–623. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.895526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M., and A. Lidstrom. 2007. “Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State.” Governance 20 (4): 609–632. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeting, D., ed. 2017. Directly Elected Mayors in Urban Governance: Impact and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and J. B. Carr. 2013. “So Close, Yet so Far Away? The Effects of City Size, Density and Growth on Local Civic Participation.” Journal of Urban Affairs 35 (3): 283–302. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, H. 2003. Turnouts in Local Elections: Explanations of Individual and Municipal Differences Turnout. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Edinburgh
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, H. 2007. “Local Electoral Systems in Western Europe.” Local Government Studies 33 (2): 159–180. doi:10.1080/03003930701198524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, P. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-Study.” Local Government Studies 43 (3): 408–428. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1300147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1987. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2002. “Local Political Competence in Europe: A Resource of Legitimacy for Higher Levels of Government?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1093/ijpor/14.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2015. “Just a Matter of Timing? Local Electoral Turnout in Germany in the Context of National and European Parliamentary Elections.” German Politics 24 (1): 67–84. doi:10.1080/09644008.2014.984693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar