Effects of schoolwide cluster grouping and within-class ability grouping on elementary school students’ academic achievement growth

References

• Brulles, D., Saunders, R., & Cohn, S. J. (2010). Improving performance for gifted students in a cluster grouping model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 327–350.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1–76). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, J. (2005). NWEA reliability and validity estimates: Achievement level tests and measures of academic progress (NWEA Report). Retrieved from http://center.uoregon.edu/conferences/CCSA/CCSA08/uploads/KEY_1042180/Tilton_ResearchNWEAReliabilityandValidity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J., & Moon, S. (1992). Grouping gifted students: Issues and concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 63–67. doi:10.1177/001698629203600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & MacDougall, J. (2009). Total school cluster grouping: Model, research, and practice. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, S. K. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted & talented ( 2nd ed., pp. 211–234). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Mann, R. L. (2008). Total school cluster grouping and differentiation: A comprehensive, research-based plan for student achievement and improving teacher practices. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Owen, S. (1999). An investigation of the effects of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224–243. doi:10.1177/001698629904300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2013). Different teachers, different peers: The magnitude of student sorting within schools. Educational Researcher, 42, 304–316. doi:10.3102/0013189X13495087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, J. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73–77. doi:10.1177/001698629203600204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. P. (2005). Cognitive abilities test (CogAT). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McBee, M. T. (2010). Modeling outcomes with floor or ceiling effects: An introduction to the Tobit model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 314–320. doi:10.1177/001698621037909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: Recommendations for best practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 330–341. doi:10.1177/0016986207306319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomi, T. (2010). The effects of within-class ability grouping on academic achievement in early elementary years. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 56–92. doi:10.1080/19345740903277601
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association. (2010). Measures of academic progress MAP basics overview. Portland, OR: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nwea.org/sites/www.nwea.org/files/resources/MAP%20Basics%20Overview_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1987). Tracking in secondary schools: A contextual perspective. Educational Psychologist, 22, 129–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J., Matthews, M. S., McBee, M. T., & McCoach, D. B. (2013). Beyond gifted education: Designing and implementing advanced academic programs. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R. L., Cassady, J. C., Adams, C. M., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Dixon, F. A., & Cross, T. L. (2011). The effects of clustering and curriculum on the development of gifted learners’ math achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 569–594. doi: 10.1177/016235321103400403
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1987). Grouping for instruction in the elementary school. Educational Psychologist, 22, 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roeper Review, 26, 29–36. doi:10.1080/02783190309554236
   Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 60–89. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
   Google Scholar
• Wiskow, K., Fowler, V. D., & Christopher, M. M. (2011). Active advocacy: Working together for appropriate services for gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 34, 20–25.
   Google Scholar