What characterizes children nominated as gifted by teachers? A closer consideration of working memory and intelligence

References

• Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adderholdt-Elliot, M., Algozzine, K., Algozzine, B., & Haney, K. (1991). Current state practices in educating students who are gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 14, 20–23. doi:10.1080/02783199109553375
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T. P., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2011). The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 133–137. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7, 85–97. doi:10.1027//1016-9040.7.2.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, D. (2009). Gifted children’s humor preferences, sense of humor, and comprehension of riddles. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 419–436. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2009.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H. (2009). Myth 2: The gifted constitute 3% to 5% of the population. Moreover, giftedness equals high IQ, which is a stable measure of aptitude: Spinal tap psychometrics in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 236–238. doi:10.1177/0016986209346825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1961). Fluid and crystallized intelligence. In J. J. Jenkins & G. Donald (Eds.), Studies in individual differences: The search for intelligence (pp. 738–746). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:10.1037/11491-064
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & Ahn, D. (2003). Strategy acquisition and maintenance of gifted and nongifted young children. Exceptional Children, 69, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colom, R., Abad, F. J., Quiroga, M. Á., Shih, P. C., & Flores-Mendoza, C. (2008). Working memory and intelligence are highly related constructs, but why? Intelligence, 36, 584–606. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00096-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 126–138. doi:10.1177/0016986210397831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433. doi:10.3758/BF03214546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, P. F., & Das-Smaal, E. A. (1995). Attention and intelligence: The validity of the Star Counting Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 80–92. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Ruf, H. (2005). Primary school teachers’ criteria for the identification of gifted pupils. High Ability Studies, 16, 219–228. doi:10.1080/13598130600618140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F., & Sayler, M. F. (1990). Special classes for academically gifted youth. Roeper Review, 12, 244–249. doi:10.1080/02783199009553283
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., & Josepsson, B. (2002). A gifted programme in Iceland and its effects. High Ability Studies, 13, 35–46. doi:10.1080/13598130220132299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman-Nimz, R. (2009). Myth 6: Cosmetic use of multiple selection criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 248–250. doi:10.1177/0016986209346925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 1–34. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00051-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanses, P., & Rost, D. H. (1998). Das ‘Drama’ der hochbegabten Underachiever – ‘Gewöhnliche’ oder ‘außergewöhnliche’ Underachiever? [The ‘drama’ of the gifted underachievers: ‘Ordinary’ or ‘extraordinary’ underachievers?] Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie [German Journal of Educational Psychology], 12, 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hany, E. A. (1991). Sind Lehrkräfte bei der Identifikation hochbegabter Schüler doch besser als Tests? Eine Untersuchung mit neuen Methoden [Are teachers after all better than tests in identifying gifted students? A study with new methods]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 38, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselhorn, M., Schumann-Hengsteler, R., Gronauer, J., Grube, D., Mähler, C., Schmid, I., … Zoelch, C. (Eds.). (2012). Arbeitsgedächtnistestbatterie für Kinder von 5 bis 12 Jahren (AGTB 5–12) [Working memory test battery for children from 5 to 12 years (AGTB 5–12)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hoard, M. K. (2005). Mathematical cognition in gifted children: Relationships between working memory, strategy use, and fluid intelligence (Dissertation). University of Missouri, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Hoard, M. K., Geary, D. C., Byrd-Craven, J., & Nugent, L. (2008). Mathematical cognition in intellectually precocious first graders. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 251–276. doi:10.1080/87565640801982338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (2006). An examination of shortened measures of intelligence in the assessment of giftedness (Dissertation). Ball State University, Indiana, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., Weismer, S. E., Miller, C. A., Francis, D. J., Tomblin, J. B., & Kail, R. V. (2007). Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 408–428. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/029)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, C. K., Hau, K. T., Tse, S. K., & Loh, K. Y. (2007). Component skills of text comprehension in less competent Chinese comprehenders. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 75–97. doi:10.1007/s11881-007-0004-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie, R. H. (2011). The functional organization and capacity limits of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 240–245. doi:10.1177/0963721411415340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., & Molenaar, D. (2010). The issue of power in the identification of “g” with lower-order factors. Intelligence, 38, 336–344. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). The structure and function of academic self-concept in gifted and general education students. Roeper Review, 25, 61–65. doi:10.1080/02783190309554200
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. I., Ramiro, P., Lopez, J. M., Aguilar, M., Acosta, M., & Montero, J. (2006). Mental attention in gifted and nongifted children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 401–411. doi:10.1007/BF03173510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neber, H. (2004). Teacher identification of students for gifted programs: Nominations to a summer school for highly-gifted students. Psychology Science, 46, 348–362.
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 45–100). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51002-X
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity – Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00251-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto, Y., Curtis, R., Jabagchourian, J. J., & Weckbacher, L. M. (2006). Mathematical precocity in young children: A neo‐Piagetian perspective. High Ability Studies, 17, 183–202. doi:10.1080/13598130601121409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passow, A. H., & Frasier, M. M. (1996). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198–202. doi:10.1080/02783199609553734
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781452272054
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170. doi:10.1177/001698620004400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinn, A. N. (2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 232–245. doi:10.1177/0016986207302718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost, D. H., & Hanses, P. (1997). Wer nichts leistet, ist nicht begabt? Zur Identifikation hochbegabter Underachiever durch Lehrkräfte [Not achieving – Not gifted? About the identification of gifted underachievers by teacher ratings]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 29, 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Schulthess-Singeisen, L., Neuenschwander, M. P., & Herzog, W. (2008). Die Entwicklung des schulischen Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepts bei Primarschulkindern mit einer Lehrernomination als hochbegabt [Development of academic self-concept of primary school children nominated as gifted by their teachers]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 55, 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18, 617–656. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., Marzocchi, G. M., Coser, S., Del Savio, M., Meuter, R. F., & Rumiati, R. I. (2002). Executive function profile of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21, 43–71. doi:10.1207/S15326942DN2101_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, F. R., Willis, C., & Adams, A.-M. (2012). Different components of working memory have different relationships with different mathematical skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 139–155. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: What are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22, 185–209. doi:10.1002/per.676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). (2011). Explorations in giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511778049
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 176–188. doi:10.1177/0016986212456079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 743–762. doi:10.1037/a0027627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability – And a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00100-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (2006). Cognitive processes that underlie mathematical precociousness in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 239–264. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (2011). Working memory, attention, and mathematical problem solving: A longitudinal study of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 821–837. doi:10.1037/a0025114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threlfall, J., & Hargreaves, M. (2008). The problem-solving methods of mathematically gifted and older average-attaining students. High Ability Studies, 19, 83–98. doi:10.1080/13598130801990967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toll, S. W. M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2011). Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 521–532. doi:10.1177/0022219410387302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038–1066. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.1038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 199–215.10.1177/001698620605000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vock, M. (2005). Arbeitsgedächtniskapazität bei Kindern mit durchschnittlicher und hoher Intelligenz [Working memory capacity in children with average and high intelligence] (Dissertation). University of Muenster, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Vock, M., & Holling, H. (2008). The measurement of visuo-spatial and verbal-numerical working memory: Development of IRT-based scales. Intelligence, 36, 161–182. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß, R. H. (2008). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 – Revision (CFT 20-R) mit Wortschatztest und Zahlenfolgentest – Revision (WS/ZF-R) [Culture Fair Intelligence Test-20 Revision (CFT 20-R) with tests for vocabulary and numerical order – Revision (WS/ZF-R)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, K.-P. (1993). Hochbegabtendiagnostik durch Lehrers [High ability diagnosis by teachers]. In D. H. Rost (Ed.), Lebensumweltanalyse hochbegabter Kinder [Analyzing the living environment of gifted children] (pp. 236–261). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, K., Steedle, J., Shavelson, R., Alonzo, A., & Oppezzo, M. (2006). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and science learning. Educational Research Review, 1, 83–98. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M., Shanizinovich, I., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R. D. (2005). Assessing emotional intelligence in gifted and non-gifted high school students: Outcomes depend on the measure. Intelligence, 33, 369–391. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar