Is having low motivation the same as not having high motivation? Comparing the CSAS-R and the SAAS-R

References

• Baslanti, U., & McCoach, D. B. (2006). Factors related to the underachievement of university students in Turkey. Roeper Review, 28, 210–215.10.1080/02783190609554366
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, J. H. (1992). They can but they don’t. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10197-000
   Google Scholar
• Carleton, R. N., McCreary, D. R., Norton, P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2006). Brief fear of negative evaluation scale-revised. Depression and Anxiety, 23, 297–303. doi:10.1002/da.20142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. T., & Johnston, C. (2002). Developmental differences in children’s use of rating scales. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 27–36.10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedrick, R. F., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., Suldo, S. M., & Ferron, J. M. (2015). Psychometric properties of the school attitude assessment survey-revised with international baccalaureate high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 38–54.10.1177/0016986214559596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, E. I. (1998). Perceived factors influencing the academic underachievement of talented students of Puerto Rican descent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 105–122.10.1177/001698629804200205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 440–464. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodeen, H. (2015). The effects of positively and negatively worded items on the factor structure of the UCLA loneliness scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 259–267. doi:10.1177/0734282914548325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowdall, C. B., & Colangelo, N. (1982). Underachieving gifted students: Review and implications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 179–184.10.1177/001698628202600406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, M., Ford, G., Hunt, K., & Der, G. (2000). Question wording effects in the assessment of global self-esteem. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 13–19. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.16.1.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. Y. (1996). Determinants of underachievement as perceived by gifted, above average, and average Black students. Roeper Review, 14, 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., Liem, G. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., Marsh, H. W., & McInerney, D. (2012). Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: Key processes from a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1111–1122. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.10.3102/00346543070002151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, V. (1998). Underachieving boys: Problems and solutions. Support for Learning, 13, 174–178.10.1111/1467-9604.00084
   Google Scholar
• Horan, P. M., DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2003). Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artifact or response style? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 435–455. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1988). The psychology of underachievement. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810–819. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366–381. doi:10.1037/a0019225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul, A. (2013). Method effects and the meaning of measurement. Frontiers In Psychology Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 4(169), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00169
   Google Scholar
• McCall, R. B., Evahn, C., & Kratzer, L. (1992). High school underachievers: What do they achieve as adults? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003a). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 144–154.10.1177/001698620304700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003b). The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 414–429.10.1177/0013164403063003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., Picho, K., & Baslanti, U. (2010, April). Validation of the challenges to scholastic achievement scale (CSAS-R): Comparing the CSAS-R and the SAAS-R. Paper session presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
   Google Scholar
• Rodebaugh, T. L., Holaway, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (2004). The treatment of social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 883–908.10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegle, D. (2013). The underachieving gifted child: Recognizing, understanding, and reversing underachievement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2004). Motivating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2012). Underachieving gifted students. In C. M. Callahan, & H. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 377–387). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B., & Rubenstein, L. D. (2012). Understanding and addressing underachievement in gifted students. In T. L. Cross, & J. R. Cross (Eds.), The handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents: Development, relationships, school issues, and counseling needs/interventions (pp. 511–526). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sliter, K. A., & Zickar, M. J. (2014). An IRT examination of the psychometric functioning of negatively worded personality items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 214–226. doi:10.1177/0013164413504584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suldo, S. M., Shaffer, E. J., & Shaunessy, E. (2008). An independent investigation of the validity of the school attitude assessment survey-revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Supplee, P. L. (1990). Reaching the gifted underachiever. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 84–98.10.1080/10705519909540120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., Sancho, P., & Lila, M. (2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 299–313. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.769394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, H. W., & Mönks, F. J. (1992). General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 169–186.10.1007/BF01537335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E., & Szamosközi, Ş. (2012). Effects of direct academic motivation-enhancing intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioural Psychotherapies, 12, 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston, MA: Allen & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children’s achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 101–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar