Emphasis on emotions in student learning: Analyzing relationships between overexcitabilities and the learning approach using Bayesian MIMIC modeling

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). IBM SPSS Amos 24 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Amos Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis using Mplus: Technical implementation. Technical appendix. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1987). The study process questionnaire: Manual. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchet, N., & Falk, R. F. (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 260–267. doi:10.1177/001698620104500404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1596–1603. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Mainly openness: The relationship between the big five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524–529. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Lewis, M. (2007). Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 241–250. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381–398. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.4.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, K. (1967). Personality-shaping through positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London: Gryf Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S., & Meckstroth, E. (2009). Nurturing the sensitivity, intensity, and developmental potential of young gifted children. In S. Daniels & M. M. Piechowski (Eds.), Living with intensity: Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 33–56). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S., & Piechowski, M. M. (2009). Embracing intensity: Overexcitability, sensitivity, and the developmental potential of the gifted. In S. Daniels & M. M. Piechowski (Eds.), Living with intensity: Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 3–17). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Bondt, N., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the overexcitability questionnaire-two applying Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) and multiple-group BSEM-based alignment with approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1963. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2002). The relationship between intelligence, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 219–230. doi:10.1080/00313830220142218
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, 143–155. doi:10.1002/per.469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2008). The validity and reliability of the short inventory of learning patterns. In E. Cools (Ed.), Style and cultural differences: How can organisations, regions and countries take advantage of style differences (pp. 49–59). Gent: Vlerick Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Donche, V., Van Petegem, P., Van de Mosselaer, H., & Vermunt, J. (2010). LEMO: Een Instrument Voor Feedback over Leren en Motivatie [LEMO: An instrument providing feedback on learning and motivation]. Mechelen: Plantyn.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J. (1997). Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb. Higher Education, 33, 213–218. doi:10.1023/A:1002930608372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325–346. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. F., Lind, S., Miller, N. B., Piechowski, M. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1999). The Overexcitability Questionnaire – Two (OEQ-II): Manual, scoring system, and questionnaire. Denver, CO: Institute for the Study of Advanced Development.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (2009). Building firm foundations: Research and assessments. In S. Daniels & M. M. Piechowski (Eds.), Living with intensity: Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 239–259). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Christopher, A., Garwood, J., & Martin, G. (2007). Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1563–1571. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Monsen, J., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement: Big Five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 769–782. doi:10.1348/978185409X412147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. A. (2013). Building bridges: Research on gifted children’s personalities from three psychological theories. In C. S. Neville, M. M. Piechowski, & S. S. Tolan (Eds.), Off the charts: Asynchrony and the gifted child (pp. 48–98). Unionville, NY: Royal Fireworks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457–472. doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136
   Google Scholar
• Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, W. (1969). Prüfsystem für Schul- und Bildungsberatung PSB [Test System for School and Education Advice PSB]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Depaoli, S. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 650–673). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K., Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012). The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 722–752. doi:10.1177/1094428112457829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2011). Bayesian data-model fit assessment for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 663–685. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.607723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysy, K. Z., & Piechowski, M. M. (1983). Personal growth: An empirical study using Jungian and Dabrowskian measures. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 108, 267–320.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalizing on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1 – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendaglio, S. (2008). Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration: A personality theory for the 21st century. In S. Mendaglio (Ed.), Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration (pp. 13–40). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendaglio, S. (2012). Overexcitabilities and giftedness research: A call for a paradigm shift. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 207–219. doi:10.1177/0162353212451704
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. B., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the education of the gifted, 18, 20–38. doi:10.1177/016235329401800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335. doi:10.1037/a0026802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). Late-breaking news: Some exciting new methods. Keynote Address at the Modern Modeling Methods Conference, University of Connecticut. Retrieved from www.statmodel.com
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piechowski, M. M. (1979). Developmental potential. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 25–57). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Piechowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539–549. doi:10.2466/pms.1985.60.2.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankel, M. D. (2008). Dabrowski on authentic education. In S. Mendaglio (Ed.), Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration (pp. 79–100). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheines, R., Hoijtink, H., & Boomsma, A. (1999). Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models. Psychometrika, 64, 37–52. doi:10.1007/BF02294318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. K. (2008). The theory of positive disintegration in the field of gifted education. In S. Mendaglio (Ed.), Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration (pp. 157–173). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 64, 583–639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stumm, S., & Furnham, A. (2012). Learning approaches: Associations with typical intellectual engagement, intelligence and the big five. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 720–723. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, W., Hofmans, J., Cooremans, S., & Staels, E. (2014). Factorial validity and measurement invariance across intelligence levels and gender of the Overexcitabilities Questionnaire – II (OEQ-II). Psychological Assessment, 26, 55–68. doi:10.1037/a0034475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (1994). Inventory of learning styles in higher education: Scoring key. Tilburg: Department of Educational Psychology, Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., & Minnaert, A. (2003). Dissonance in student learning patterns: When to revise theory? Studies in Higher Education, 28, 49–61. doi:10.1080/0307507032000031127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 359–384. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition Learning, 3, 123–146. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuyk, M. A., Krieshok, T. S., & Kerr, B. A. (2016). Openness to experience rather than overexcitabilities: Call it like it is. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 192–211. doi:10.1177/0016986216645407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirthwein, L., Becker, C. V., Loehr, E., & Rost, D. H. (2011). Overexcitabilities in gifted and non-gifted adults: Does sex matter? High Ability Studies, 22, 145–153. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.622944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2003). Does the big five predict learning approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431–1446. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00125-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41, 390–420. doi:10.1177/0149206313501200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar