Why I believe I achieve determines whether I achieve

References

• Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1, 76–85. doi:10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognition theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski, W. Arie, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 516–539). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brigandi, C. B. (2015). Gifted secondary school students and enrichment: The perceived effect on achievement orientation ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.
   Google Scholar
• Brigandi, C., Siegle, D., Weiner, J., Gubbins, E. J., & Little, C. (2016). Gifted secondary school students: The perceived relationship between enrichment and goal valuation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39, 263–287. doi:10.1177/0162353216671837
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., & Petty, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032–1043.10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678–707. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. L. (2012). Giftedness and underachievement: A comparison of student groups ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
   Google Scholar
• De Corte, E. (2016, April). Self-regulated learning: A major vehicle for talent development. Abstract for presentation at the Inaugural European-North American Summit on Talent Development, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109–128. doi:10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and malleable minds: Implications for giftedness and talent. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & E. J. Gubbins (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education (pp. 7–18). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.10.1177/0146167295213003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R Th, & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://www.coachingmanagement.nl/The%20Making%20of%20an%20Expert.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Figg, S. D., Rogers, K. B., McCormick, J., & Low, R. (2012). Differentiating low performance of the gifted learner: Achieving, underachieving, and selective consuming students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23, 53–71. doi:10.1177/1932202X1143300000
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P., Jr, Rodgers, W., & Cobb, S. (1974). Adjustment as person-environment fit. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610455
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J., Harradine, C. C., & Coleman, M. R. (1997). Challenge or boredom? Gifted students’ views on their schooling. Roeper Review, 19, 132–136.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200–210.10.1177/001698629604000405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (2001). Attributional retraining: A classroom-integrated model for nurturing talents in mathematics and the sciences. In N. Colangelo & S. Assouline (Eds.), Talent development IV (pp. 205–217). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, C. M., Lewis, R. K., Scott, A., Wren, D., Nilsen, C., & Colvin, D. Q. (2012). Exploring the educational aspirations-expectations gap in eighth grade students: Implications for educational interventions and school reform. Educational Studies, 38, 507–519. doi:10.1080/03055698.2011.6431114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, M. J. & Davidson, S. K. (2004). Student attitudes and their academic performance: Is there any relationship? Medical Teacher, 26, 52–56.10.1080/01421590310001642993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, C. A. (2012). Curriculum as motivation for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 695–705. doi:10.1002/pits.21621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, L. C., & Erwin, A. (2016, September). The effect of two interventions on high ability underachievers in an independent secondary school. Presentation at the Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented Conference, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., Snyder, K. E., Thomas, C., Malone, P. S., & Putaliaz, M. (2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 203–212. doi:10.1177/0016986215599057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B. (2002). A validation study of the School Attitude Assessment Survey. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2001). A comparison of high achievers’ and low achievers’ attitudes, perceptions, and motivations. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5, 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003a). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 144–154.10.1177/001698620304700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003b). The structure and function of academic self-concept in gifted and general education samples. Roeper Review, 25, 61–65.10.1080/02783190309554200
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L., & Marzano, R. J. (1990). Putting the self into self-regulated learning: The self as agent in integrating will and skill. Educational Psychologist, 25, 51–69.10.1207/s15326985ep2501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNabb, T. (2003). Motivational issues: Potential to performance. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 417–423). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, E., Vogl, K., & Preckel, F. (2014). Motivational characteristics of students in gifted classes: The pivotal role of need for cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 39–46.10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. M. (2006). Variations in test anxiety and locus of control orientation in achieving and underachieving gifted and nongifted middle school students ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.
   Google Scholar
• Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbu, J. U. (1978). Minority education and caste. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, P. M., Costa, J. L. C., Corbi, R. G., & Iniesta, A. V. (2016). The SAAS-R: A new instrument to assess the school attitudes of students with high and low academic achievement in Spain. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. doi:10.1177/0748175616639106
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boehaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
   Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Vock, M. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 401–411.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J. M., & Purcell, J. H. (1998). Curriculum compacting and achievement test scores: What does the research say? Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 123–129.10.1177/001698629804200206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610455
   Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. B., Siegle, D., & Davis, G. A. (2018). Education of the gifted and talented (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchotte, J. A., Matthews, M. S., & Flowers, C. P. (2014). The validity of the achievement-orientation model for gifted middle school students: An exploratory study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 183–198. doi:10.1177/0016986214534890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.10.1037/h0092976
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubenstein, L. D., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., & Burton, M. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 678–694. doi:10.1002/pits.21620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2013). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D. (2012). Recognizing both effort and talent: How do we keep from throwing the baby out with the bathwater? In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & E. J. Gubbins (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education (pp. 233–243). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D. (2013). The underachieving gifted child: Recognizing, understanding, and reversing underachievement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & Langley, S. D. (2016). Promoting optional mindsets among gifted children. In M. Neihart, S. Pfeiffer, & T. L. Cross (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (2nd ed., pp. 269–280). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Motivating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B., & Shea, K. (2014). Application of the achievement orientation model to the job satisfaction of teachers of the gifted. Roeper Review, 36, 210–220. doi:10.1080/02783193.2014.945219
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & Reis, S. M. (1998). Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of gifted students’ ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 39–47.10.1177/001698629804200105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., & Mitchell, M. S. (2014). Honors students’ perceptions of their high school experiences: The influence of teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 35–50. doi:10.1177/0016986213513496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., Pollard, E., & Romey, E. (2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshman honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 92–101.10.1177/0016986209355975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2005). Genetics of giftedness: The implications of an emergenic-epigenetic model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (3rd ed., pp. 312–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610455
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educatioanl attainmetn: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 421–442.10.1037/a0022777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, K. E., Barger, M. M., Wormington, S. V., Schwartz-Bloom, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Identification as gifted and implicit beliefs about intelligence: An examination of potential moderators. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 242–258.10.1177/1932202X13507971
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54.10.1177/1529100611418056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suldo, S. M., Shaffer, E. J., & Shaunessy, E. (2008). An independent investigation of the validity of the School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 69–82. doi:10.1177/0734282907303089
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (2017). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Wood, S. M. (2009). The integrated curriculum model. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed., pp. 655–691). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
   Google Scholar
• Winton, B. J. (2013). Reversing underachievement among gifted secondary students ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/37824/research.pdf?sequence=2
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (1987). The relationship of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 1013–1024.10.1177/0013164487474017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Towards a systemic theory of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 23, 3–30. doi:10.1080/13598139.2012.679085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2010). Research on a modified framework of implicit personality theories. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 318–326. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R., Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Taylor Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The hidden dimension of personal competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 509–526). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 145–155.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar