6,070
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Exploring obstacles faced by gifted minority students through Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological systems theory

, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Adamsons, K., O’Brien, M., & Pasley, K. (2007). An ecological approach to father involvement in biological and stepfather families. Fathering, 5, 129–147.
  • American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities. (2012). Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.aspx
  • Arroyo, C. G., & Zigler, E. (1995). Racial identity, academic achievement, and the psychological well-being of economically disadvantaged adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 903–914.
  • Baldwin, A. (2005). Identification concerns and promises for gifted students of diverse populations. Theory into Practice, 44, 105–114.
  • Benson, M. J., & Buehler, C. (2012). Family process and peer deviance influences on adolescent aggression: Longitudinal effects across early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 83, 1213–1228.
  • Bergin, D., & Cooks, H. (1995). “Acting white”: Views of high school students in a scholarship incentive program. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center.
  • Bernal, E. M. (1997). Some thoughts on the changing complexion of GT education: The demographic shift could revitalize the field. Baylor Educator, 22, 10–17.
  • Bernal, E. M. (2002). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper review, 24, 82–88.
  • Borland, J. H. (2004). Issues and practices in the identification and education of gifted students from under-represented groups (Research Monograph No. 04186). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164–171.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.1080/00131728109336000
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Bioecological models of human development. Readings on the Development of Children, 2, 37–43.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10176-018
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10317-001
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A biological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9, 115–125.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1023). New York: Wiley.
  • Bryan, N., & Ford, D. Y. (2014). Recruiting and retaining Black male teachers in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 37, 156–161.
  • Callahan, C. (2005). Identifying gifted students from underrepresented populations. Theory into Practice, 44, 98–104.
  • Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). The development of perceived scholastic competence and global self-worth in African American adolescents from low-income families: The roles of family factors, early educational intervention, and academic experience. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 277–302.
  • Comer, J. P., & Haynes, N. M. (1991). Parent involvement in schools: An ecological approach. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 271–277.
  • Constantine, M. G. (2002). Racism attitudes, white racial identity attitudes, and multicultural counseling competence in school counselor trainees. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 162–174.
  • Dahl, G. B., & Lochner, L. (2017). The impact of family income on child achievement: Evidence from the earned income tax credit: Reply. American Economic Review, 107, 629–631.
  • Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/10128
  • Duncan, G. J., Morris, P. A., & Rodrigues, C. (2011). Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on young children’s achievement with data from random-assignment experiments. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1263–1279.
  • Eamon, M. K. (2001). The effects of poverty on children’s socioemotional development: An bioecological systems analysis. Social Work, 46, 256–266.
  • Erwin, J. O., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 74–87.
  • Farrant, B. M., & Zubrick, S. R. (2012). Early vocabulary development: The importance of joint attention and parent-child book reading. First Language, 32, 343–364.
  • Ferguson, R. F. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap. Urban Education, 38, 460–507.
  • Ford, D. Y. (1995). Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet. Journal of Negro Education, 64, 52–62.
  • Ford, D. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 4–14.
  • Ford, D. Y. (2006). Closing the achievement gap: How gifted education can help. Gifted Child Today, 29, 14–18.
  • Ford, D. Y. (2010). Underrepresentation of culturally different students in gifted education: Reflections about current problems and recommendations for the future. Gifted Child Today, 33, 31–35.
  • Ford, D. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Roeper review, 36, 143–154.
  • Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008a). Another look at the achievement gap: Learning from the experiences of gifted Black students. Urban Education, 43, 216–238.
  • Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008b). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74, 289–308.
  • Ford, D. Y., & Harmon, D. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 141–142.
  • Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J., III. (1996). Perceptions and attitudes of Black students toward school, achievement, and other educational variables. Child Development, 67, 1141–1152.
  • Ford, D. Y., & Whiting, G. W. (2011). Beyond testing: Social and psychological considerations in recruiting and retaining gifted Black students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 131–155.
  • Frongillo, E. A., Jyoti, D. F., & Jones, S. J. (2006). Food stamp program participation is associated with better academic learning among school children. The Journal of Nutrition, 136, 1077–1080.
  • Frye, B., & Vogt, H. (2010). The causes of underrepresentation of African American children in gifted programs and the need to address this problem through more culturally responsive teaching practices in teacher education programs. Black History Bulletin, 73, 11–17.
  • Gagné, F. (2008). Building gifts into talent: Brief overview of the DMGT 2.0. Retrieved from http://nswagtc.org.au/images/stories/infocentre/dmgt_2.0_en_overview.pdf
  • Gallagher, J. (2005). According to Jim Gallagher. Roeper review, 27, 135–136.
  • Giessman, J. A., Gambrell, J. L., & Stebbins, M. S. (2013). Minority performance on the Naglieri nonverbal ability test, second edition, versus the cognitive abilities test, form 6: One gifted program’s experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 101–109.
  • Gorski, P. C. (2009). What we’re teaching teachers: An analysis of multicultural teacher education coursework syllabi. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 309–318.
  • Grantham, T. (2011). New directions for gifted Black males suffering from bystander effects: A call for upstanders. Roeper review, 33, 263–272.
  • Grantham, T., & Ford, D. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self-esteem for African American students: Improving racial identity improves achievement. The High School Journal, 87, 18–29.
  • Grantham, T. C., Frasier, M. M., Roberts, A. C., & Bridges, E. M. (2005). Parent advocacy for culturally diverse gifted students. Theory into Practice, 44, 138–147.
  • Grissom, J. A., & Redding, C. (2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2, 2332858415622175.
  • Hargrove, B., & Seay, S. (2011). School teacher perceptions of barriers that limit the participation of African American males in public school gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 434–467.
  • Harris, J., III, & Ford, D. (1991). Identifying and nurturing the promise of gifted Black American children. The Journal of Negro Education, 60, 3–18.
  • Henfield, M. S., Woo, H., & Bang, N. M. (2017). Gifted ethnic minority students and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 3–19.
  • Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, Public Law Number 110-315, § 200-202, 122 Stat. 3133–3137. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ315/pdf/PLAW-110publ315.pdf
  • Hodge, K. A., & Kemp, C. R. (2006). Recognition of gifted in the early years of school: Perspectives of teachers, parents, and children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 164–204.
  • Hodges, J., Tay, J., Maeda, Y., & Gentry, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 147–174.
  • Hughes, J. N., Gleason, K. A., & Zhang, D. (2005). Relationship influences on teachers’ perceptions of academic competence in academically at-risk minority and majority first grade students. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 303–320.
  • Jaeger, E. L. (2016). Negotiating complexity: A bioecological systems perspective on literacy development. Human Development, 59, 163–187.
  • Joseph, L. M., & Ford, D. Y. (2006). Nondiscriminatory assessment: Considerations for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 42–51.
  • Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131–155.
  • Kitano, M. K., & Lewis, R. B. (2005). Resilience and coping: Implications for gifted children and youth at risk. Roeper review, 27, 200–205.
  • Kozol, J. (2002). Malign neglect. The Nation, 274(22), 22–23.
  • Kuklinski, M. R., & Weinstein, R. S. (2001). Classroom and developmental differences in a path model of teacher expectancy effects. Child Development, 72, 1554–1578.
  • Lee, C. H. (2011). An ecological systems approach to bullying behaviors among middle school students in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1664–1693.
  • Lee, S., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Peternel, G. (2010). The efficacy of academic acceleration for gifted minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 189–208.
  • Lindstrom, R., & Van Sant, S. (1986). Special issues in working with gifted minority adolescents. Journal of Counseling & Development, 64, 583–586.
  • Lohman, B. J., & Billings, A. (2008). Protective and risk factors associated with adolescent boys’ early sexual debut and risky sexual behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 723–735.
  • Lohman, D. F. (2005). An aptitude perspective on talent: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333–360.
  • Lohman, D. F. (2006). Identifying academically talented minority students (Research Monograph No. RM05216). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
  • Long, M. C., Conger, D., & Latarola, P. (2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 285–322.
  • Lopez, G. R., Scribner, J. D., & Mahitivanichcha, K. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 253–288.
  • Lubin, B., Wallis, R. R., & Paine, C. (1971). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935 – 1969. Professional Psychology, 2, 70–74.
  • Makel, M. C. (2009). Student and parent attitudes before and after the gifted identification process. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 126–143.
  • Makel, M. C., Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Putallaz, M., & Benbow, C. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science., 27, 1004–1018.
  • Masten, A. S., & Narayan, A. J. (2012). Child development in the context of disaster, war and terrorism: Pathways of risk and resilience. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 227–257.
  • McBee, M. T. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Prufrock Journal, 17, 103–111.
  • McBee, M. T. (2010). Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel path analysis study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 283–297.
  • McBee, M. T. (2016). What you don’t look for, you won’t find: A commentary on card and Giuliano’s examination of universal screening. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27, 131–138.
  • McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., & Miller, E. M. (2016). The impact of the nomination stage on gifted program identification: A comprehensive psychometric analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 258–278.
  • McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., & Waterman, C. (2014). Combining scores in multiple-criteria assessment systems the impact of combination rule. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 69–89.
  • McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2002). The structure and function of academic self-concept in gifted and general education students. Roeper review, 25, 61–65.
  • McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235–261.
  • Miller, E. M. (2009). The effect of training in gifted education on elementary classroom teachers’ theory-based reasoning about the concept of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 65–105.
  • Miller, L. S. (2004). Promoting sustained growth in the representation of African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans among top students in the United States at all levels of the education system. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Milner, H., & Ford, D. (2007). Cultural considerations in the underrepresentation of culturally diverse elementary students in gifted education. Roeper review, 29, 166–173.
  • Moon, T. R., & Brighton, C. M. (2008). Primary teachers’ conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 447–480.
  • Moore, J. L., III, Ford, D. Y., & Milner, H. R. (2005). Recruitment is not enough: Retaining African American students in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 51–67.
  • Mueller, C., & Haines, R. T. (2012). Adolescent perceptions of family connectedness and school belonging: Links with self-concept and depressive symptoms among gifted African American and Hispanic youth. Gifted Children, 5(article), 3.
  • Mueller, C. E. (2009). Protective factors as barriers to depression in gifted and non-identified adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 3–14.
  • Muller, L. E. (2002). Group counseling for African American men: When all you have are European American counselors. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 27, 299–313.
  • National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC); American School Counselor Association (ASCA). (2018). State-by-state student-to-counselor ratio report. Retrieved from https://www.schoolcounselor.org/asca/media/asca/Publications/ratioreport.pdf
  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2010). NAGC position statement: WISC-IV. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=2455
  • National Association for Gifted Children and The Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (2015). 2014–2015 state of the states in gifted education. Policy and practice data. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/key%20reports/2014-2015%20State%20of%20the%20States%20(final).pdf
  • Neumeister, K. L. S., Adams, C. M., Pierce, R. L., Cassady, J. C., & Dixon, F. A. (2007). Fourth-grade teachers’ perceptions of giftedness: Implications for identifying and serving diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 479–499.
  • Ogbu, J. U. (2003). Black students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.3726/978-1-4539-1735-0/47
  • Olszewski‐Kubilius, P., & Scott, J. (1992). An investigation of the college and career counseling needs of economically disadvantaged, minority gifted students. Roeper review, 14, 141–148.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Steenbergen-Hu, S., Thomson, D., & Rosen, R. (2017). Minority achievement gaps in STEM: Findings of a longitudinal study of project excite. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 20–39.
  • Ostrander, R. R. (2015). School funding: Inequality in district funding and the disparate impact on urban and migrant school children. BYU Education and Law Journal, 2015, 271–295.
  • Peters, S. J., & Engerrand, K. G. (2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented services. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 159–171.
  • Peters, S. J., & Gentry, M. (2012). Group-specific norms and teacher-rating scales: Implications for underrepresentation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23, 125–144.
  • Plucker, J. A., Burroughs, N., & Song, R. (2010). Mind the (other) gap! Bloomington: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University.
  • Plucker, J. A., Hardesty, J., & Burroughs, N. (2013). Talent on the sidelines: Excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Storrs: Center for Education Policy Analyses, University of Connecticut.
  • Ponitz, C. C., Rimm-Kaufmann, S. E., Grimm, K. J., & Curby, T. W. (2009). Kindergarten classroom quality, behavioral engagement, and reading achievement. School Psychology Review, 38, 102–120.
  • Riggins-Caspers, K. M., Cadoret, R. J., Knutson, J. F., & Langbehn, D. (2003). Biology-environment interaction and evocative biology-environment correlation: Contributions of harsh discipline and parental psychopathology to problem adolescent behaviors. Behavior Genetics, 33, 205–220.
  • Ritchotte, J. A., Suhr, D., Alfurayh, N. F., & Graefe, A. K. (2016). An exploration of the psychosocial characteristics of high achieving students and identified gifted students: Implications for practice. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27, 23–38.
  • Rotigel, J. V. (2003). Understanding the young gifted child: Guidelines for parents, families and educators. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 209–214.
  • Schader, R. M. (2008). Parenting. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 479–492). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., & Lee, Y. H. (2010). Assessment of advanced placement participation and university academic success in the first semester: Controlling for selected high school academic abilities. Journal of College Admission, 208, 26–30.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440.
  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education a proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54.
  • Szymanski, T., & Shaff, T. (2013). Teacher perspectives regarding gifted diverse students. Gifted Children, 6, 1–27.
  • Tenenbaum, H. R., & Ruck, M. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 253–273.
  • Tudge, J. R. (2016). Implicit versus explicit ways of using Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory. Human Development, 59, 195–199.
  • Tudge, J. R., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B. E., & Karnik, R. B. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 198–210.
  • Tudge, J. R., Odero, D. A., Hogan, D. M., & Etz, K. E. (2003). Relations between the everyday activities of preschoolers and their teachers’ perceptions of their competence in the first years of school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 42–64.
  • Tudge, J. R., Payir, A., Merçon‐Vargas, E., Cao, H., Liang, Y., Li, J., & O’Brien, L. (2016). Still misused after all these years? A reevaluation of the uses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 427–445.
  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS). (2013). Public school teacher data file: 1987–88 through 2011–12; Private school teacher data file: 1987–88 through 2011–12; and Charter school teacher data file: 1999–2000.
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2014). Civil rights data collection- Data snapshot: College and career readiness. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/crdc-college-and-career-readiness-snapshot.pdf
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, The State of Racial Diversity in the Educator Workforce. (2016). Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/racial-diversity/state-racial-diversityworkforce.pdf
  • Uresti, R., Goertz, J., & Bernal, E. (2002). Maximizing achievement for potentially gifted and talented and regular minority students in a primary classroom. Roeper review, 25, 27–31.
  • van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 497–527.
  • Vantassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X., Swanson, J. D., Quek, C., & Chandler, K. (2009). Academic and affective profiles of low-income, minority, and twice-exceptional gifted learners: The role of gifted program membership in enhancing self. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 702–739.
  • Villegas, A. M., & Irvine, J. J. (2010). Diversifying the teaching force: An examination of major arguments. The Urban Review, 42, 175–192.
  • Washington, A. R. (2015). “It’s like he’ll [school counselor] be there for you”: Middle school African American males’ stories of effective professional school counselors. Journal of African American Males in Education, 6, 1–16.
  • Wine, J., Janson, N., & Wheeless, S. (2011). Beginning postsecondary students longitudinal study (BPS:04/09) full-scale methodology report (NCES 2012-246). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
  • Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69–91.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.