The gender role and career self-efficacy of gifted girls in STEM areas

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem sex role inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1986). Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1997). Applications of self efficacy theory to the career assessment of women. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick, P. C., & Blewitt, P. (2010). The life span: Human development for helping professionals (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. P., & Wong, J. (2013). Career counseling for gifted students. Australian Journal of Career Development, 22, 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Corwith, S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2012). Academic planning for gifted students. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 477–493). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), the developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumspection and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monographs, 28, 545–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 85–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, D. F., Battle, D. A., & Heggoy, S. J. (2000). The journey through college of seven gifted females: Influences on their career related decision. Roeper Review, 22, 251–260.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. J. (2003). Gifted adrift? Career counseling of the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 25, 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. J. (2006). Helping build lives: Career and life development of gifted and talented students. Professional School Counseling, 10, 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 232–258). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. S., & Kelly, K. R. (2015). Identity and career development in gifted students. In F. A. Dixon & S. M. Moon (Eds.), the handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 35–63). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert, T. P. (2011). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
   Google Scholar
• Jen, E. (2017). Affective interventions for high-ability students from 1984–2015: A review of published studies. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28, 225–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jen, E., Wu, J., & Gentry, M. (2016). The social-affective concerns of high-ability adolescents–Lessons learned from students’ perspectives. Journal of Advanced Academic, 27, 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kachel, S, Steffens, M. C, & Niedlich, C. (2016). Traditional masculinity and femininity: validation of a new scale assessing gender roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1990). Sex and science. In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary reading in social sciences (pp. 41–57). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A. (2012). Developmental issues for the gifted and creative girl: Milestone and danger zones. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 315–332). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A., & Gahm, J. (2018). Developing talents in girls and young women. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 399–416). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A., & Robinson Kurpius, S. E. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15, 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A., Vuyk, M., & Rea, C. (2012). Gendered practices in the education of gifted girls and boys. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 647–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2012). Career planning. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 529–542). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2013). Focusing on the future: Experience from a career-related program for high-ability students and their parents. Gifted Child Today, 36, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, C. C., & Lin, M. H. (2003). Gifted females: Where are they? The Gifted Education Quarterly, 89, 1–17. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2012). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 643–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, M. (2007). Career counseling is personal counseling: A constructivist approach to nurturing the development of gifted female adolescents. Career Development Quarterly, 55, 206–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S. M. (2002). Counseling needs and strategies. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), the social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 213–222). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muratori, M. C., & Smith, C. K. (2015). Guiding the talent and career development of the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93, 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, K. D., Cooper, C. E., & Woodruff, A. L. (2007). Children’s and adolescents’ developing perceptions of gender inequality. Social Development, 16, 682–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quimby, J. L., & DeSantis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women’s career choices. Career Development Quarterly, 54, 297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Gaesser, A. H. (2015). Gender, adolescence, and giftedness. In F. A. Dixon & S. M. Moon (Eds.), the handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 91–120). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sajjadi, S. H., Rejskind, F. G., & Shore, B. M. (2001). Is multipotentiality a problem or not? A new look at the data. High Ability Studies, 12, 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, J. P., & Chason, A. K. (2008). Helping gifted and talented adolescents and young adults: Make informed and careful career choices. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 327–346). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stickel, S. A., & Bonett, R. M. (1991). Gender differences in career self-efficacy: Combining a career with home and family. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 297–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B. A., Reis, M. S., & Leonard, J. S. (1992). A developmental investigation of the lives of gifted women. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. M., Quatman, T., & Edler, E. (2002). Career aspirations of adolescent girls: Effects of achievement level, grade, and single-sex school environment. Sex Roles, 46, 323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters, J. J. (2010). Career decision making among gifted students: The mediation of teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 222–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. P., & Lin, H. T. (2010). The effects of a mentoring curriculum on gender roles, career self-efficacy, and career development in a high school class for gifted girls in math and science. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55, 27–61.
   Google Scholar
• Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1036–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar