Personality profiles of gifted adolescents and relations with life satisfaction, perceived social support, and academic achievement

References

• Asendorpf, J. B. (2002). Editorial: The puzzle of personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, J. B. (2015). Person-centered approaches to personality. In M. L. Cooper & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), Handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 403–424). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14343-018
   Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15(3), 169–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, J. B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (1999). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: Replicability, predictive power, and the trait-issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 815–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO-Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Baudson, T., & Preckel, F. (2013). Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(1), 37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (1978). The mad genius debate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Beverly Hills, CA: Bancroft Books.
   Google Scholar
• Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B., & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality Special Issue, 16(S1), 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, B. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (2011). Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 593–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. M., Ma, L., Knott, C. L., Williams, B. R., Park, C. L., Schulz, E. K., & Ghosh, D. (2020). A longitudinal examination of social support as a mediator of the personality-health relationship in a national sample of African Americans. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(8), 607–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. M., Williams, R. M., Park, C. L., Schulz, E., Williams, B. R., & Knott, C. L. (2019). Explaining the relationship between personality and health in a national sample of African Americans: The mediating role of social support. Journal of Black Psychology, 45(5), 339–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(3), 339–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., Samuels, J., & Ozer, D. (2002). The replicability and utility of the three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L., Cross, J. R., Mammadov, S., Ward, T., Neumeister, K. S., & Andersen, L. (2018). Psychological heterogeneity among honors college students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 242–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. R., O’Reilly, C., Kim, M., Mammadov, S., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Social coping and self-concept among young gifted students in Ireland and the United States: A cross-cultural study. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 39–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. R., Vaughn, C. T., Mammadov, S., Cross, T. L., Kim, M., O’Reilly, C., … Hymer, B. (2019). A cross-cultural study of the social experience of giftedness. Roeper Review, 41(4), 224–242.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., & van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16(S), 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of human personality (3rd ed.). London, UK: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. W., & Farmer, E. (1996). Social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: Social networks and homophily. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 431–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L. (2014). Personality, well-being, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 719–742.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. A. (1990). Personality patterns of the gifted. Understanding Our Gifted, 3(1), 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, M., Farb, B., Revelle, W., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2018). A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nature Human Behavior, 2(10), 735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 141–165.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg, P. T., & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20(1), 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. School Psychology International, 12(3), 231–243.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner, E. S., Valois, R. F., Paxton, R. J., & Drane, J. W. (2005). Middle school students’ perceptions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory-versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California. doi:10.1037/t07550-000
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2017). Health psychology. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five-factor model (pp. 403–422). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.2
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Tsutsui, Y. (2018). Extraversion and life satisfaction: A cross-cultural examination of student and nationally representative samples. Journal of Personality, 86(4), 604–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, F., Gong, X., Sajjad, S., Yang, K., & Zhao, J. (2019). How is emotional intelligence linked to life satisfaction? The mediating role of social support, positive affect and negative affect. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(8), 2733–2745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroesbergen, E. H., van Hooijdonk, M., Viersen, S. V., Middel-Lalleman, M. M. N., & Reijnders, J. J. W. (2016). The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(1), 16–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, R., & Buss, D. (2018). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Thomson, D. T. (2012). Academically gifted students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limont, W., Dreszer-Drogorόb, J., Bedyńska, S., Śliwińska, K., & Jastrzębska, D. (2014). ‘Old wine in new bottles’? Relationships between overexcitabilities, the big five personality traits and giftedness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litster, K., & Roberts, J. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 130–140.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, J. W., Saudargas, R. A., Gibson, L. W., & Leong, F. T. (2005). An investigation of broad and narrow personality traits in relation to general and domain-specific life satisfaction of college students. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 707–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammadov, S. (2021a). A comparison of creativity-relevant personal characteristics in adolescents across personality profiles. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 5(2), 294–305.
   Google Scholar
• Mammadov, S. (2021b). The big five personality traits and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 90(2), 222–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammadov, S., Ward, T. J., Cross, J. R., & Cross, T. L. (2016). Use of latent profile analysis in studies of gifted students. Roeper Review, 38(3), 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAbee, S. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2013). The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: A meta-analytic validity competition. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 532–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Variation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R., & John, O. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., T, C. P., Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1456–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeus, W., van de Schoot, R., Klimstra, T., & Branje, S. (2011). Personality types in adolescence: Change and stability and links with adjustment and relationships: A five-wave longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1181–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L., & Speirs Neumeister, K. L. (2017). The influence of personality, parenting styles, and perfectionism on performance goal orientation in high ability students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(4), 313–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrofan, N., & Ion, A. (2013). Predictors of academic performance: The relation between the big five factors and academic performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 125–129.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• NAGC (2010). Redefining giftedness for a new century: Shifting the paradigm. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Statement/Redefining%20Giftedness%20for%20a%20New%20Century.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M., & Yeo, L. S. (2018). Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 497–510). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0000038-032
   Google Scholar
• Nylund-Gibson, K., Garber, A. C., Singh, J., Witkow, M. R., Nishina, A., & Bellmore, A. (2021). The utility of latent class analysis to understand heterogeneity in youth’s coping strategies: A methodological introduction. OSFpreprints. doi:10.31219/osf.io/t8ver
   Google Scholar
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P. M., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(4), 347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, J., De Backer, F., Reina, V. R., Kindekens, A., Buffel, T., & Lombaerts, K. (2014). The role of teachers’ self-regulatory capacities in the implementation of self-regulated learning practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1963–1970.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, G. R., Lakey, B., Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Joseph, H. J. (1997). Personality and social support processes: A conceptual overview. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1843-7_1
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Borkenau, P. (2004). Resilients, overcontrollers, and undercontrollers: The replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants. European Journal of Personality, 18(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinn, A. N., Reynolds, M. J., & McQueen, K. S. (2011). Perceived social support and the self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(3), 367–396.
   Google Scholar
• Rinn, A. N., Soles, K. L., Ferguson, S., & Smith, K. N. (2019). Psychological profiles among high ability undergraduate students. High Ability Studies, 31(2), 157–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N. O., & Vassend, O. (2018). Genetics, personality and wellbeing. A twin study of traits, facets and life satisfaction. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 12298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schimmack, U., Bockenholt, U., & Reisenzein, R. (2002a). Response styles in affect ratings: Making a mountain out of a molehill. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(3), 461–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002b). Life satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 345–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1062–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel, K., Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: German NEO-PI-R versus NEO-FFI. European Journal of Personality Special Issue, 16(S), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, R. A., & Delisle, J. A. (2003). Gifted adolescents. In N. Colangelo & C. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 483–492). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big-five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht, J., Luhmann, M., & Geiser, C. (2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 540–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steca, P., Alessandri, G., & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well-known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 442–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 295–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., & Foster, A. (2010). Big five traits interact to predict perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 736–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirthwein, L., Bergold, S., Preckel, F., & Steinmayr, R. (2019). Personality and school functioning of intellectually gifted and nongifted adolescents: Self-perceptions and parents’ assessments. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2012). Personality. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 111–137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13274-005
   Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M., & Shani-Zinovich, I. (2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the big-five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 566–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar