354
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Patterns of high ability and underrepresented students’ subject-specific psychosocial strengths: A latent profile analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 229-248 | Received 21 Apr 2022, Accepted 31 Jan 2023, Published online: 09 Feb 2023

References

  • Abe, E., Chikoko, V., & Lubinga, S. N. (2021). The link between career outcomes expectancy and career decision-making self-efficacy of STEM students in a South African university. Perspectives in Education, 39(2), 52–66. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-persed_v39_n2_a5
  • ACT. (2013). ACT explore [Assessment instrument]. Author.
  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29
  • Ali, S. R., & Menke, K. A. (2014). Rural Latino youth career development: An application of social cognitive career theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00078.x
  • Ali, S. R., & Saunders, J. L. (2006). College expectations of rural Appalachian youth: An exploration of social cognitive career theory factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 55(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00003.x
  • Ali, S. R., Yang, L. -Y., Button, C. J., & McCoy, T. T. H. (2012). Career education programming in three diverse high schools: A critical psychology—case study research approach. Journal of Career Development, 39(4), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845311398131
  • Assouline, S. G., Ihrig, L. M., & Mahatmya, D. (2017). Closing the excellence gap: Investigation of an expanded talent search model for student selection into an extracurricular STEM program in rural middle schools. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701833
  • Assouline, S. G., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2012). The talent search model of gifted identification. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911433946
  • Assouline, S. G., Mahatmya, D., Ihrig, L., & Lane, E. (2021). High-achieving rural middle-school students’ academic self-efficacy and attributions in relationship to gender. High Ability Studies, 32(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1740582
  • Baldwin, A. Y. (2005). Identification concerns and promises for gifted students of diverse populations. Theory into Practice, 44(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4402_5
  • Bernstein, B. O., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2021). Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 830. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000500
  • Burns, E. C., Collie, R. J., Van Bergen, P., & Martin, A. J. Intrapersonal and interpersonal psychosocial adjustment resources and achievement: A multilevel latent profile analysis of students and schools. (2022). Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(8), 1912. 1930. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000726
  • Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Oh, S. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215
  • Flaherty, B. P., & Kiff, C. J. (2012). Latent class and latent profile models. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 391–404). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13621-019
  • Flores, L. Y., & O’brien, K. M. (2002). The career development of Mexican American adolescent women: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.1.14
  • Foley-Nicpon, M., & Assouline, S. G. (2020). High ability students with coexisting disabilities: Implications for school psychological practice. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1615–1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22342
  • Foley-Nicpon, M., & Lin, C. L. L. (2022). Identifying and providing instructional services for twice-exceptional students. In K. L. Chandler & J. A. Castellano (Eds.), Identifying and serving diverse gifted learners: Meeting the needs of special populations in gifted education (pp. 118–200). Taylor & Francis.
  • Hawes, M. T., Finsaas, M. C., Olino, T. M., & Klein, D. N. (2022). A person-centered approach to understanding child temperament at ages 3 and 6. European Journal of Personality, 36(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211007666
  • Hodis, F. A., Hattie, J. A., & Hodis, G. M. (2017). Investigating student motivation at the confluence of multiple effectiveness strivings: A study of promotion, prevention, locomotion, assessment, and their interrelationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.009
  • Hong, W., Bernacki, M. L., & Perera, H. N. (2020). A latent profile analysis of undergraduates’ achievement motivations and metacognitive behaviors, and their relations to achievement in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1409–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000445
  • Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. (2006). Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology, 52(3), 377–389. Special Issue: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0029
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  • Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2217–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551371
  • Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Farb, A. F. (2012). Engagement acrossdevelopmental periods. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 45–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_3
  • Mahatmya, D., & Smith, A. (2017). Family and neighborhood influences on meeting college expectations in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 5(3), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696816663833
  • Nariman, N. (2021). How does an industry-aligned technology-rich Problem-based Learning (PBL) model influence low-income and Native Hawaiian student’s STEM career interest? Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6367
  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
  • O’brien, K. M., Dukstein, R. D., Jackson, S. L., Tomlinson, M. J., & Kamatuka, N. A. (1999). Broadening career horizons for students in at-risk environments. The Career Development Quarterly, 47(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00732.x
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Steenbergen-Hu, S., Thomson, D., & Rosen, R. (2017). Minority Achievement gaps in STEM: findings of a longitudinal study of project excite. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216673449
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2017). The role of domains in the conceptualization of talent. Roeper review, 39(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1247310
  • Peters, P., Gubbins, E. J., Hamilton, R., McCoach, D. B., Siegle, D., & Puryear, J. (2021). Identifying underrepresented gifted students. In S. R. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 465–485). Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_21
  • Peters, S. J. (2022). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
  • Peters, S. J., Gentry, M., Whiting, G. W., & McBee, M. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
  • Plucker, J. A., Burroughs, N., & Song, R. (2010). Mind the (other) gap! The growing excellence gap in K-12 education. Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
  • Plucker, J. A., & Peters, S. J. (2016). Excellence gaps in education: Expanding opportunities for talented students. Harvard Education Press.
  • Plucker, J. A., & Peters, S. J. (2017). Closing poverty-based excellence gaps: Conceptual, measurement, and educational issues. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 56–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738566
  • Rinn, A. N., Soles, K. L., Ferguson, S., & Smith, K. N. (2020). Psychological profiles among high ability undergraduate students. High Ability Studies, 31(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1607721
  • Rogers, K. B. (2015). The academic, socialization, and psychological effects of acceleration: Research synthesis. In S. G. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Lupkowski-Shoplik (Eds.), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 19–29). The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
  • Ross, K. M., & Tolan, P. (2018). Social and emotional learning in adolescence: Testing the CASEL model in a normative sample. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(8), 1170–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617725198
  • Saw, G. K., Chang, C. N., & Chan, H. Y. (2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18787818
  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
  • Smith, P. L., & Fouad, N. A. (1999). Subject-matter specificity of self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, interests, and goals: Implications for the social–cognitive model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.4.461
  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (Eds). (2019). High performance: The central psychological mechanism for talent development. In R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius, & F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 7–20). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-002
  • Turner, S. L., Joeng, J. R., Sims, M. D., Dade, S. N., & Reid, M. F. (2019). SES, gender, and STEM career interests, goals, and actions: A test of SCCT. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748665
  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019454
  • Wegemer, C. M. (2021). Critical civic motivation of marginalized youth: An expectancy-value approach. Youth & Society, 0044118X211044522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211044522
  • Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2018). Talent development: A path toward eminence. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 247–258). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-016

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.