The (mis)identification of ineffective classroom teaching practice: critical interrogations of classroom teacher effectiveness research

References

• Adams, P. (2011). From ‘ritual’ to ‘mindfulness’: Policy and pedagogic positioning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(1), 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2006). Fear of small numbers. An essay on the geography of anger. Durham, NC & London: Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2004). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy towards the performative society. In S. Ball (Ed.), The Routledge Falmer reader in sociology of education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ballou, D., Sanders, W., & Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for Student Background in Value-Added Assessment of Teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 29(1), 37–65.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsely-Amrein, A. (2011). The SAS^R education value-added assessment system (EVAAS^R): Its intended and unintended effects in a major urban school system. Washington, DC: AERA-NAED.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D.C. (2008). Synthesizing causal inferences. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britzman, D.P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: A new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories. Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, H.C., & Lockwood, J.R. (2006). Fitting value-added models in research. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(2), 205–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2001). “Education education education ”. Taking education really seriously. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Enquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1997). The politics of truth. New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, N.L. (1972). Teacher effectiveness and teacher education. The search for a scientific basis. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2000). Just schooling: Explorations in the cultural politics of teaching. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”?. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Presentation for the Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Imig, D.G., & Imig, S.R. (2006). The teacher effectiveness movement: How 80 years of essentialist control have shaped the teacher education profession. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. (2010). Valences of the dialectic. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, M.A. (2010). Troubling the discourse of teacher centrality: A comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2000). Federalism in schooling since the Karmel Report (1973), schools in Australia: From modernist hope to post-modernist performativity. Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 25–61.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modelling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1),67–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2007). Researching social inequalities in education: Towards a Bourdieuian methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(4), 433–447.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2010). Schooling in disadvantaged communities. Playing the game from the back of the field. Heidelberg: Springer Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mulderrig, J. (2011). Manufacturing consent: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of new labour’s educational governance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 562–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, H., Koshy, V., & Taylor, A. (2007). ‘Gifts, talents and meritocracy ’. Journal of Education Policy, 22(3), 283–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckase, M.D. (2004). The real world is more complicated than we would like. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 117–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilbeck, M., & Connell, H. (2004). Teachers for the future: The changing nature of society and related issues for the teaching workforce. A Report to the Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership Taskforce of the Ministerial Council for Education, Employment Training and Youth Affairs. Published by DEST, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000). Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. London and New York, NY: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teese, R., & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling. Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the social limits of reform. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M., Lauder, H., & Robinson, T. (2002). School composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 483–504.
   Google Scholar
• Veyne, P. (2010). Foucault. His thought, his character. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Victorian Auditor General’s Report. (2009). Literacy and numeracy achievement. Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• The Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Blueprint For Government Schools. (2003/2008). Future directions for education in the Victorian government school system. Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• The Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development: Research Priority Areas of Interest. (2008–2011). Melbourne: Education Policy and Research Division. Office for Policy, Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, T., Lingard, B., & Thomson, P. (2012). Pedagogies of transformation: Keeping hope alive in troubled times. Critical Studies in Education, 53(1), 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar