Getting beyond “gut feeling”: understanding how mentors judge readiness to teach

References

• Brooker, R., Muller, R., Mylonas, A., & Hansford, B. (1998). Improving the assessment of practice teaching: A criteria and standards framework. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(1), 5–24. doi:10.1080/0260293980230101
   Google Scholar
• Coles, C. (2002). Developing professional judgment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22(1), 3–10. doi:10.1002/chp.1340220102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooksey, R. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods and applications. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47. doi:10.1177/0022487109348024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerger, D., & Dallmer, D. (2008). Maintaining high standards in a pass/fail practicum. International Journal of Learning, 15(5), 173–177.
   Google Scholar
• Ell, F., & Grudnoff, L. (2013). The politics of responsibility: Teacher education and persistent underachievement in New Zealand. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 73–86. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.739023
   Google Scholar
• Fish, D. (1995). Quality mentoring for teacher candidates. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Gates Foundation. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching. MET Project. Retrieved from http://www.metproject.org/reports.php
   Google Scholar
• Goh, K., Wong, A., Choy, D., & Inn, J. (2009). Confidence levels after practicum experiences of student teachers in Singapore: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Policy, 6(2), 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudnoff, L., Hawe, E., & Tuck, B. (2005). Effective teaching and standards for teaching: A loose coupling. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 14, 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hagger, H., & McIntyre, D. (2006). Learning teaching from teachers: Realising the potential of school based teacher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., & Ell, F. (2014). Consensus and dissensus in mentor teachers’ judgments of readiness to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., Ell, F., & Mackisack, V. (2013). Judging teacher candidates’ readiness to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., & Tuck, B. (1999, December). Assessing teacher candidates performance in the practicum. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the Australian Association of Research in Education and the New Zealand Association of Research in Education, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K., Rohrbaugh, J., Mumpower, J., & Adelman, L. (1977). Social judgment theory: Applications in policy formation. In M. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes in applied settings (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Clinton, J. (2001). The assessment of teachers. Teaching Education, 12, 279–300. doi:10.1080/10476210120096551
   Google Scholar
• Hegender, H. (2010). The assessment of student teachers’ academic and professional knowledge in school–based teacher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(2), 151–171. doi:10.1080/00313831003637931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, P., & Schutz, A. (2001). Educational standards, assessment, and the search for consensus. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 37–70. doi:10.3102/00028312038001037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumpower, J., & Stewart, T. (1996). Expert judgement and expert disagreement. Thinking and Reasoning, 2(2–3), 191–212. doi:10.1080/135467896394500
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Harvey, R., Slee, P., Lawson, M., Silins, H., Banfield, G., & Russell, A. (2000). Under stress: The concerns and coping strategies of teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 19–35. doi:10.1080/713667267
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Teachers Council. (2007). Graduating teacher standards: Aotearoa New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• Ortlipp, M. (2009). Shaping conduct and bridling passions: Governing practicum supervisors’ practice of assessment. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(2), 156–167. doi:10.2304/ciec.2009.10.2.156
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259–297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rorrison, D. (2010). Assessment of the practicum in teacher education: Advocating for the student teacher and questioning the gatekeepers. Educational Studies, 36(5), 505–519. doi:10.1080/03055691003729013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, T. (2005). Using the practicum in pre-service teacher education programs: Strengths and weaknesses of alternative assumptions about the experiences of learning to teach. In G. F. Hoban (Ed.), The missing links in teacher education design. Developing a multi-linked conceptual framework (pp. 135–152). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 191–209. doi:10.1080/0305498870130207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L., & Elstein, A. (1975). Studies of problem solving, judgment, and decision making: Implications for educational research. Review of Research in Education, 3, 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2010). Assessing the practicum in teacher education – Do we want candidates and mentors to agree? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(1–2), 36–41. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 289–302. doi:10.1080/13598660500286333
   Google Scholar
• Ssentamu-Namubiru, P. (2010). Teaching practicum supervisors’ identity and student assessment on the practicum: An assorted mind-set? Africa Education Review, 7, 305–322. doi:10.1080/18146627.2010.515423
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, H., Smith, K., & Leshem, S. (2011). Dual roles – Conflicting purposes: A comparative study on perceptions on assessment in mentoring relations during practicum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 139–159. doi:10.1080/02619768.2010.543672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Bloomfield, D., & Le Cornu, R. (2010). Professional experience in new times: Issues and responses to a changing education landscape. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 181–193. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2010.493297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Hamada, M. (2000). Experiments: Planning, analysis and parameter design optimisation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar