A methodology to investigate pre-service teachers’ content-related instructional decisions and teaching actions

References

• Angelides, P. (2001). The development of an efficient technique for collecting and analyzing qualitative data: The analysis of critical incidents. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 429–442.
   Google Scholar
• Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1999). A cognitive model for examining teachers’ instructional practice in mathematics: A guide for facilitating teacher reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 211–235.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. Available from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, D. (2010). Emotions and ‘getting by’: A pre-service teacher navigating professional experience. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, T. J. (1999). The conceptual knowledge of preservice secondary mathematics teachers: How well do they know the subject matter they will teach? Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. (1996). Introduction to research methods (3rd ed.). South Melbourne, Victoria: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A. S. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5, 475–497.
   Google Scholar
• Chesler, J. (2012). Pre-service secondary mathematics teachers making sense of definitions of functions. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(1), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, L. (2015). Enacting mathematical content knowledge in the classroom: The preservice teacher experience of lower secondary algebra ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Donna, J. D., & Hick, S. R. (2017). Developing elementary preservice teacher subject matter knowledge through the use of educative science curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28, 92–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. (1999). Fostering algebraic thinking: A guide for teachers, grades 6-10. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 467–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 94–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and its impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M. (2013). Knowledge for teaching secondary school mathematics: What counts? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44, 972–983.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2007). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. (Working Paper 3). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Available from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509656.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honderich, T. (Ed.). (1995). The Oxford companion to philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R. (2014). Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge of Algebra: A Comparative Study in China and the United States of America. Available from http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658036713?wt_mc=GoogleBooks.GoogleBooks.3.EN&token=gbgen#otherversion=9783658036720
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., & Ahtee, M. (2006). Comparing primary student teachers’ attitudes, subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge needs in a physics activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 503–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Gess‐Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite, B., & Wiebe, R. (2012). Fostering the development of chemistry teacher candidates: A bioecological approach. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12, 36–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marble, S. (2007). Inquiring into teaching: Lesson study in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 935–953.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Davis, B. (2013). The importance of teachers’ mathematical awareness for in-the-moment pedagogy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13, 182–197.
   Google Scholar
• McCrory, R., Floden, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Reckase, M. D., & Senk, S. L. (2012). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 584–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organizational Science, 13, 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, G., & Schilling, S. (2004). Developing measures of content knowledge for teaching reading. The Elementary School Journal, 105, 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R., Howley, P., Southgate, E., & Brown, J. (2015). Just add hours? An assessment of pre-service teachers’ perception of the value of professional experience in attaining teacher competencies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 455–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Classroom observations in theory and practice. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 45, 607–621.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1995). The reflective practitioner. Arena: Hants, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, N., & Hald, O. (2008). How do mathematicians learn to teach? Implications from research on teachers and teaching for graduate student professional development. In M. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 305–318). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Thwaites, A., Jared, L., & Rowland, T. (2011). Analysing secondary mathematics teaching with the knowledge quartet. Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 227–228.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2012). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Ha, A. S. (2013). The theory of planned behaviour: Predicting pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour towards a constructivist approach. Sport, Education and Society, 18, 222–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessments to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 729–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar