References
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). Australian Curriculum. Retrieved May 27, 2020, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
- Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2017). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-framework/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers.pdf
- Bansilal, S. (2011). Assessment reform on South Africa: Opening up or closing spaces for teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 91–107.
- Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189.
- Beijaard, D., Meijer, P., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.
- Bennison, A. (2015a). Developing an analytic lens for investigating identity as an embedder-of-numeracy. Mathematics Education Research Journal., 27(1), 1–19.
- Bennison, A. (2015b). Supporting teachers to embed numeracy across the curriculum: A sociocultural approach. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 561–573.
- Bennison, A. (2016). A sociocultural approach to understanding identity as an embedder-of-numeracy: A case of numeracy and history. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 491–502.
- Bennison, A. (2017). Re-examining a framework for teacher identity as an embedder-of-numeracy. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: We are still learning. Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Group of Australasia (pp. 101–108). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
- Blanton, M., Westbrook, S., & Carter, G. (2005). Using Valsiner’s zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 5–33.
- Carter, M., Klenowski, V., & Chalmers, C. (2015). Challenges in embedding numeracy throughout the curriculum in three Queensland secondary schools. Australian Educational Researcher, 42(5), 595–611.
- Chee, Y. S., Mehrotra, S., & Ong, J. (2015). Professional development for scaling pedagogical innovation in the context of game-based learning: Teacher identity as the cornerstone of shifting practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 423–437.
- Cobb, D., Harlow, A., & Clark, L. (2018). Examining the teacher identity-agency relationship through legitimate peripheral participation: A longitudinal investigation. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 495–510.
- Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2008). National numeracy review report. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/national_numeracy_review.pdf
- Darragh, L. (2016). Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics., 93(1), 19–33.
- Forgasz, H., & Hall, J. (2019). Learning about numeracy: The impact of a compulsory unit on pre-service teachers’ understandings and beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2) Article 2, 15–33.
- Geiger, V., Anderson, J., & Hurrell, D. (2017). A case study of effective practice in mathematics teaching and learning informed by Valsiner’s zone theory. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 143–161.
- Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531–548.
- Goos, M. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers. ZDM - the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 521–533.
- Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2019). A zone theory approach to analysing identity formation in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(3), 405–418.
- Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012). Auditing the numeracy demands of the Australian curriculum. In J. Dindyal & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons. Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 314–321). Singapore: MERGA.
- Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2014). Transforming professional practice in numeracy teaching. In Y. Li, E. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 81–102). New York, NY: Springer.
- Graven, M., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Mathematics identity research: The state of the art and future directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(3), 361–377.
- Gresalfi, M., & Cobb, P. (2011). Negotiating identities for mathematics teaching in the context of professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 270–304.
- Gresham, G. (2008). Mathematics anxiety and teacher efficacy in elementary pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 19(3), 171–184.
- Hardy, I. (2014). A logic of enumeration: The nature and effects of national literacy and numeracy testing in Australia. Journal of Educational Policy, 29(1), 1–18.
- Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.
- Hodges, T., & Cady, J. (2012). Negotiating contexts to construct an identity as a mathematics teacher. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(2), 112–122.
- Hussain, M., Monaghan, J., & Threlfall, J. (2013). Teacher-student development in mathematics classrooms: Interrelated zones of free movement and promoted action. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 285–302.
- Milton, M., Rohl, M., & House, H. (2007). Secondary beginning teachers’ preparedness to teach literacy and numeracy: A survey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), Article 4. 37-56.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
- Philipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. Lester Jnr (Ed.), Second handbook on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: NCTM.
- Quantitative Literacy Design Team. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (1–22). Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
- Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity. In P. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5–21). New York, NY: Routledge Farmer.
- Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.
- Stake, R. (2003). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 134–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Thornton, S., & Hogan, J. (2004). Orientations to numeracy: Teachers’ confidence and disposition to use mathematics across the curriculum. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 315–320). Bergen, Norway: PME.
- Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory for human development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Van Zoest, L., & Bohl, J. (2005). Mathematics teacher identity: A framework for understanding secondary school mathematics teachers’ learning through practice. Teacher Development, 9(3), 315–345.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.