Teachers’ mediation in students’ development of cognition and metacognition

References

• Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning (ED463659). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED463659
   Google Scholar
• Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82(3), 343–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Duncan, C., & Rainer, A. (2017). What is coding? In Creating the coding generation in primary schools (pp. 3–21). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou. In W. Kaufmann, Tran (Eds.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A., & Capps, D. K. (2018). Teacher cognition of engaging children in scientific practices. In Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 9–32). Switzerland AG: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Kunze, A. J. (2020). Metacognition in education: Translational research. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2005). An introduction to Vygotsky. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Boston, MA: Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, S. (2007). Member checking with older women: A framework for negotiating meaning. Health Care for Women International, 8, 888–908.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1985). Cognitive development (Vol. 338). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, A. (2010). Understanding phenomenology. Nurse Researcher, 17(2), 7–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education (Vol. 1, pp. 1–4). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky’s concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53(1), 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, A., Koczan, P., De Lusignan, S., & Sheeler, I. (2006). A framework for comparing video methods used to assess the clinical consultation: A qualitative study. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 31(4), 255–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., & Maitlis, S. (2010). Nonparticipant observation. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of case study research (pp. 610–612). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., & Menter, I. (2019). The essence of being a teacher educator and why it matters. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 216–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBlain, S. (2018). Learning theories for early years practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behaviour modification. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 6(4), 185–192.
   Google Scholar
• Miri, B., David, B.-C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C. (2013). LS Vygotsky and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: What does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, S. (2016). Self-regulation, metacognition and child- and adult-initiated activity: Does it matter who initiates the task? Early Child Development and Care, 186(5), 764–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J. (1997). Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowledge and new experience. San Francisco, CA: Exploratorium Institute for Inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, L., Brownlee, J. L., & Ryan, M. (2019). Teaching teachers: What [should] teacher educators “know” and “do” and how and why it matters. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 210–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modelling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Getting at lived experience. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 303–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9(1), 41–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in society (pp. 52-58). In Cole. M. (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Someren, M., Barnard, Y., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical approach to modelling cognitive. London, UK: Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M. (2018). Lev Vygotsky: Learning and Social Constructivism.Learning Theories for Early Years Practice. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, A., & Capobianco, L. (2020). Metacognition. In J. S. Abramowitz & S. M. Blakey (Eds.),  In Clinical handbook of fear and anxiety: Maintenance processes and treatment mechanisms (pp. 171–182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.008
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and education technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J. (1988). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development. Collingdale, PA: Diane Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar