An ethics of innovation for teacher education: an interview with Anne Phelan

References

• Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community. ( Michael Hardt, Trans). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Airton, L. (2014). Be(coming) the change you want to see in the world: Social justice teacher education as affective craft. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education, York University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Canadian Deans of Education [ACDE]. (2020). Teaching and teacher education for post-pandemic Canada: A position paper of the association of Canadian deans of education. Retrieved from http://csse-scee.ca/acde/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. (2016). Ironic life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2017). The vocation of the public university. In A. B. Jørgensen, J. J. Justesen, N. Bech, N. Nykrog, and R. B. Clemmensen (Eds.), What is education? An anthology on education (pp. 55–89). Copenhagen: Problema.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, T., & Smits, H. (2017). After the future in teacher education. In J. Jagodzinski (Ed.), The p recarious f uture of e ducation: Risk and u ncertainty in ecology, curriculum, learning and technology (pp. 26–51). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carusi, F. T. (2017). Why bother teaching? Despairing the ethical through teaching that does not follow. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 36(6), 633–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: How technology causes great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Phelan, A. M. (2017). Teacher education and the political: The power of negative thinking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Phelan, A. (2015). The power of negative thinking in and for teacher education. Power and Education, 7(3), 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condliffe Lagemann, E. (2008). Education research as a distributed activity across universities. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 424–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D. (2000). Negativity and politics: Dionysus and dialectics from Kant to poststructuralism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cordero, R. (2017). Making things more fragile: The persistence of crisis and the neoliberal disorder of things—Michel Foucault. In Crisis and Critique. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, J. C. (2021). Naming the future to own the future: Assemblages of the globally competent Canadian. Paper presented at the Canadian Conference for Studies in Education, Edmonton, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, V., Souto-Manning, M., & Turvey, K. (2019). Innovation in teacher education: Towards a critical re-examination. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(1), 2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furedi, G. (2009). Wasted: Why education isn’t educating. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2013). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Taylor Francis Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Karnovsky, S. (2020). Learning the emotional rules of teaching: A Foucauldian analysis of ethical self-formation in pre-service teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education, Curtin University, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2014). The rhetorical foundations of society. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. N. (2019). Blindness in seeing: A philosophical critique of the visible learning paradigm in education. Education Sciences, 9(47), 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. (2011). The case for irony. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T., & Laverty, M. (2015). Art’s teaching and teaching’s art: Philosophical, critical and educational musings. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mau, S. (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, M., Forde, C., & Dickson, B. (2015). Reshaping teacher education through the professional continuum. Educational Review, 67(2), 158–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter, I. (2020). Changing world, changing teacher education: A tribute to Geoff Whitty (1946–2018). European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills. Education 2030: The Future We Want. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Humes, W. (2003). Educational futures: Utopias and heterotopias. Policy Futures in Education, 1(3), 428–439.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, A. M., & Morris, J. (2021). Teaching and teacher education for a post-pandemic Canada: Context, crisis, critique, complication. In D. Mayer (Ed.), Teacher education policy and research: Global perspectives (pp. 43–56). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, A. M., & Rüsselbæk Hansen, D. (2021). Toward a thoughtful lightness: Education in viral times. Prospects: Comparative Journal of Curriculum, Learning and Assessment, 51(1–3), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, A. M. (2011). Towards a complicated conversation: Teacher education and the curriculum turn. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, A. M. (2015). Curriculum theorizing and teacher education: Complicating Conjunctions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, William F.(2003). Introduction. In Pinar, William F. (Ed.), International Handbook of Curriculum Research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (2002). How the alchemy makes inquiry, evidence, and exclusion. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 262–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prozorov, S. (2010). Why Giorgio Agamben is an optimist. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 36(9), 1053–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranciére, J. (2006). Hatred of democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L. (2021). Provincializing the OECD-PISA global competences project. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(2), 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsselbæk Hansen, D., & Phelan, A. M. (2019). Taste for democracy: A critique of the mechanical paradigm in education. Research in Education: Theory, Practice and Policy, 103(1), 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöholm, C. (2015). Doing aesthetics with Arendt: How to see things. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zevnik, A. (2009). Sovereign-less subject and the possibility of resistance. Journal of International Studies, 36(1), 83–106.
   Google Scholar