Academic governance provided by academic boards within the Australian higher education sector

References

• Baird, J. (2006). Beyond professionalisation: Enhancing the governance culture for Australian university governing boards. Tertiary Education and Management, 12, 297–309. doi:10.1007/s11233-006-9006-3
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, D., Kennedy, M., Swansson, J., & Richardson, A. (2009). University governance in uncertain times: Refocusing on knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Institutional Research, 14, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, W.E. (2009, October). Evaluating academic governance processes and structures: Ethical dilemmas and academic governance development. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Australasian Higher Education Evaluation Forum, Evaluation in a Changing Higher Education Landscape: Bradley and Beyond, Byron Bay, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, P. (2002). Reframing board-staff relations: Exploring the governance function using a storytelling metaphor. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12, 471–484. doi:10.1002/nml.12409
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, P., & Fredette, C. (2009a). Academic governance of universities: Reflections of a Senate Chair on moving from theory to practice and back. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 123–133. doi:10.1177/1056492608326320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, P., & Fredette, C. (2009b). Theory to practice in academic governance: Not the last word. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 142–143. doi:10.1177/1056492608326328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G.D., & Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of university governance. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 431–441. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00699.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, A.H. (2007). Thematic analysis: The role of academic boards in university governance. Australian Universities Quality Agency [AUQA] Occasional Publications Series Number 12. Melbourne, VIC: AUQA. Retrieved from http://www.auqa.edu.au/files/publications/academic%20boards_%20final_website.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feyerherm, A. (2009). Reflections of academic governance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 134–135. doi:10.1177/1056492609331789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallos, J.V. (2009). Reframing shared governance: Rediscovering the soul of campus collaboration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 136–138. doi:10.1177/1056492608326326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insch, G.S., Moore, J.E., & Murphy, L.D. (1997). Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 1–25. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, H.-D. (2002). The new managerialism in education management: Corporatization or organizational learning? Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 534–551. doi:10.1108/09578230210446027
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, G. (2004). The neglected role of a neglected body: Academic boards’ role in assuring ‘equivalent’ standards. Australian Universities’ Review, 47, 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. (2011). Academic boards: Less intellectual and more academic capital in higher education governance? Studies in Higher Education, 1–16. Online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.619655
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. (2012). Accountability, quality assurance and performativity: The changing role of the academic board. Quality in Higher Education, 18, 97–110. doi:10.1080/13538322.2012.663551
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B., & Tapper, T. (2002). The external pressures on the internal governance of universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 56, 245–256. doi:10.1111/1468-2273.00216
   Google Scholar
• Shattock, M. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stella, A., & Woodhouse, D. (2007). Benchmarking in Australian higher education: A thematic analysis of the AUQA audit reports. Melbourne, VIC: AUQA Occasional Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35–67. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swansson, J., & Blackman, D. (2009). Governance in Australian universities: Where next? CESifo DICE Report, 7, 39–46. Retrieved from http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/CESifoDICEreport209.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Cartan, G. (2001). The behavioural control room for managers: The integrator role. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22, 175–185. doi:10.1108/01437730110395079
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Cartan, G. (2006a, December). The factor structure of the competing values framework: The roles managers display and consider important from manager and others’ perspectives. Paper presented at the 20th ANZAM Conference, Management: Pragmatism, Philosophy, Priorities, Rockhampton, QLD.
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Cartan, G. (2006b). The integrated competing values framework: Its spatial configuration. Journal of Management Development, 25, 505–521. doi:10.1108/02621710610670092
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Ladyshewsky, R.K. (2012). Leadership behaviour and effectiveness of academic programme directors in Australian universities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40, 109–126. doi:10.1177/1741143211420613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar