315
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Leveraging university research to serve economic development: an analysis of policy dynamics in and across three US states

&

References

  • Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., & Feldman, M.P. (1992). Real effects of academic research: Comment. American Economic Review, 82, 363–367.
  • Berman, J. (2008). Connecting with industry: Bridging the divide. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30, 165–174.
  • Berry, F.S., & Berry, W.D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 223–260). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Campbell, T.I.D. (1997). Public policy for the 21st century: Addressing potential conflicts in university-industry collaboration. Review of Higher Education, 20, 357–379.
  • Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York, NY: IAU Press.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Davenport, S., & Leitch, S. (2010). The role of boundary organizations in maintaining separation in the triple helix. In R. Viale & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The capitalization of knowledge: A triple helix of university-industry-government (pp. 243–260). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociologist Review, 48, 147–160.
  • Dill, D.D., & Sporn, B. (1995). The implications of a post-industrial environment for the university: An introduction. In D.D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: IAU Press.
  • Eisinger, P.K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
  • Feldman, M., & Desrochers, P. (2003). Research universities and local economic development: Lessons from the history of Johns Hopkins University. Industry and Innovation, 10, 5–24.
  • Feller, I. (1992). American state governments as models for national science policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11, 288–309.
  • Feller, I. (2004). S&T-based economic development and the university: Virtuous and vicious cycles in the contributions of public research universities to state economic development objectives. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 138–150.
  • Feller, I. (2008). Neoliberalism, performance measurement, and the governance of American academic science. Paper presented at Workshop, Governance of and Through Science: National, Categories, and Tools, Paris, France.
  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29, 1–26.
  • Geiger, R.L. (1986). To advance knowledge: The growth of American research universities, 1900–1940. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Geiger, R.L. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Geiger, R.L., & Sá, C.M. (2005). Beyond technology transfer: US state policies to harness university research for economic development. Minerva, 43, 1–21.
  • Geiger, R.L., & Sá, C.M. (2008). Tapping the riches of science: Universities and the promise of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gopinathan, S., & Lee, M.H. (2011). Challenging and co-opting globalisation: Singapore’s strategies in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33, 287–299.
  • Gumport, P.J. (1993). The contested terrain of academic program reduction. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 283–311.
  • Gumport, P.J. (2007). Reflections on a hybrid field: Growth and prospects for the sociology of higher education. In P.J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (pp. 325–361). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Gumport, P.J., & Sporn, B. (1999). Institutional adaptation: Demands for management reform and university administration. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XIV, pp. 103–145). Bronx, NY: Agathon Press.
  • Gunn, A., & Mintrom, M. (2013). Global university alliances and the creation of collaborative advantage. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35, 179–192.
  • Guston, D.H. (2000). Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Harman, G. (2010). Australian university research commercialisation: Perceptions of technology transfer specialists and science and technology academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32, 69–83.
  • Hart, D.M. (2008). The politics of “entrepreneurial” economic policy development in the US states. Review of Policy Research, 25, 149–168.
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hearn, J.C., Lacy, T.A., & Warshaw, J.B. (in press). State research and development tax credits: The historical emergence of a distinctive economic policy instrument. Economic Development Quarterly.
  • Hearn, J.C., McLendon, M.K., & Lacy, T.A. (2013). State-funded “eminent scholars” programs: University faculty recruitment as an emerging policy instrument. Journal of Higher Education, 84(5), 601–639.
  • Huisman, J., (Ed.). (2009). International perspectives on the governance of higher education: Alternative frameworks for coordination. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kauppinnen, I., & Kaidesoja, T. (2013). A shift towards academic capitalism in Finland. Higher Education Policy. doi:10.1057/hep.2013.11
  • Kenney, M. (1986). Biotechnology: The university–industrial complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lane, J.E., & Johnstone, D.B., (Eds.). (2012). Universities and colleges as economic drivers: Measuring higher education’s role in economic development. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Levine, A.D., Lacy, T.A., & Hearn, J.C. (2013). The origins of human embryonic stem cell research policies in the US states. Science and Public Policy, 40, 544–558.
  • Maassen, P. & Olsen, J.P. (Eds.). (2007). University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Marginson, S. (2000). Rethinking academic work in the global era. Higher Education Policy and Management, 22, 23–35.
  • Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miller, H. (1995). States, economies and the changing labour process of academics: Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Academic work: The changing labour process in higher education (pp. 40–59). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Mok, K.H., & Hallinger, P. (2013). The quest for world class status and university responses in Asia’s world cities: An introduction by the guest editors. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35, 230–237.
  • Mooney, C.Z. (2001). Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 103–124.
  • Neave, G. (1988). Education and social policy: Demise of an ethic or change of values? Oxford Review of Education, 14, 273–283.
  • Ness, E.C. (2010). The politics of determining merit aid eligibility criteria: An analysis of the policy process. Journal of Higher Education, 81, 33–60.
  • Peterson, M.W. (1998). Improvement to emergence: An organization-environment research agenda for a postsecondary knowledge industry. Stanford, CA: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
  • Plosila, W.H. (2004). State science- and technology-based economic development policy: History, trends, and developments and future directions. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 113–126.
  • Porter, M.E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.
  • Pritchard, R. (2006). Trends in the restructuring of German universities. Comparative Education Review, 50, 90–112.
  • Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory & practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Saporta, M. (2012). Georgia research alliance sees vast improvements. Atlanta Business Chronicle. Retrieved October 17, 2012, from http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/print-edition/2012/01/20/ga-research-alliance-sees-vast.html?page=all
  • Sá, C.M., Geiger, R.L., & Hallacher, P.M. (2008). Universities and state policy formation: Rationalizing a nanotechnology strategy in Pennsylvania. Review of Policy Research, 25, 3–19.
  • Slaughter, S. (1998). ASHE presidential speech: Federal policy and supply-side institutional resource allocation at public research universities. Review of Higher Education, 21, 209–244.
  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 21, 303–339.
  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Smelser, N. (2012). Dynamics of American universities. Research and Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.1.12. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
  • Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive university structures: An analysis of adaptation to socioeconomic environments of U.S. and European universities. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.
  • State Science and Technology Institute [SSTI]. (2006). A resource guide for technology-based economic development. Westerville, OH: SSTI.
  • State Science and Technology Institute [SSTI]. (2012). Trends in technology-based economic development: Local, state, and federal action in 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2013, from http://www.ssti.org/Publications/Trends%20in%20Technology%20Based%20Economic%20Development.pdf
  • Van der Meulen, B. (1998). Science policies as principal-agent games: Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science. Research Policy, 27, 397–414.
  • Welch, A. (2002). Going global? Internationalizing Australian universities in a time of global crisis. Comparative Education Review, 46, 433–471.
  • Wilson, D.J. (2009). Beggar thy neighbor? The in-state, out-of-state, and aggregate effects of R&D tax credits. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 431–436.
  • Wilson, J.T. (1983). Academic science: Higher education and the federal government, 1950–1983. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Yeats, W.B. (2003). The second coming. In J. Ramazani, R. Ellmann, & R. O’Clair (Eds.), The norton anthology of modern and contemporary poetry (3rd ed., p. 111). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37, 1188–1204.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.