Towards a methodology to determine standard time allocations for academic work

References

• Academic Workload Guidelines (2012), Developed by the Academic Workload Development Committee, University of Tasmania. Retrieved from https://www.nteu.org.au/library/view/id/7612
   Google Scholar
• Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L.E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. (2006). Carving out time and space in the managerial university. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 19(5), 578–592. doi:10.1108/09534810610686698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016). 6333.0 - Characteristics of employment, Australia, August 2016. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/6333.0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government (Department of Education and Training). (2016). 2016 Staff numbers. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/2016-staff-numbers
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., & Middlehurst, R. (1993). The lost profession. High Education in Europe, 18(2),110–128. doi:10.1080/0379772930180209
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, S., Morley, C., & Watty, K. (2003). Why business academics remain in Australian universities despite deteriorating working conditions and reduced job satisfaction: An intellectual puzzle. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25, 13–28. doi:10.1080/13600800305740
   Google Scholar
• Bexley, E., James, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2011). The Australian academic profession in transition: Addressing the challenge of reconceptualising academic work and regenerating the academic workforce. Report for Dept. of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Centre for the Study of Higher Education: The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O’Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M., & Haslam, A. (2012). Academic leadership: Changing conceptions, Identities and experiences in UK higher education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, T.F., Lewis, H.A., & Mobbs, T. (2003). Academic workload planning revisited. Higher Education, 46(2), 215–233. doi:10.1023/A:1024787907547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannizzo, F., & Osbaldiston, N. (2015). Academic work/life balance: A brief quantitative analysis of the Australian experience. Journal of Sociology, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1440783315600803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2010). The real academic revolution. Melbourne: LH Martin Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, J., & Eveline, J. (2011). E-technology and work/life balance for academics with young children. Higher Education, 62(4), 533–550. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9404-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Santos, M., Rivera, P., & Bourne, M. (2014). Performance management in UK higher education institutions: The need for a hybrid approach. Research and Development Series, Leadership Foundation for Higher Education, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, N., & Doughney, J. (2012). Academic dissatisfaction, managerial change and neo-liberalism. Higher Education, 64, 41–58. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9479-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, J. (2013). Globalisation, neo-liberalism and the reform of teacher education in England. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 28–50. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.739017
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In R. Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel. (2007). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D., Meyer, L.H., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/13600800500283734
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. (2008). Efficiency and effectiveness in higher education: Who is accountable for what? Australian Universities’ Review, 50(1), 11–19. Retrieved from http://www.aur.org.au/archive
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. (2016). Academic work and performativity. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0084-y
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. (2017). Re-empowering academics in a corporate culture: An exploration of workload and performativity in a university. Higher Education, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0143-z
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J., & Fluck, A. (2014). The effectiveness of academic workload models in an institution: A staff perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(6), 585–602. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.957889
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J., Fluck, A., & Jetson, T. (2012). Placing a value on academic work’. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(2), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., Bullen, E., & Robb, S. (2004). The knowledge economy, the techno-preneur and the problematic future of the university. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 330–349. doi:10.2304/pfie.2004.2.2.8
   Google Scholar
• Langford, P.H. (2010). Benchmarking work practices and outcomes in Australian universities using an employee survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 41–53. doi:10.1080/13600800903440543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, M., & Ingersoll, L. (2010). Regulated autonomy or autonomous regulation? Collective bargaining and academic workloads in Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(2), 137–148. doi:10.1080/13600800903440592
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minimum Standards for Academic Levels (MSALs). Academic Classification Descriptors. Retrieved from http://www.human-resources.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/829199/Academic-Classification-Descriptors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2015). The university model is a victim of its own success. Australian Universities’ Review, 57(2), 87–90. Retrieved from http://www.nteu.org.au/article/The-university-model-is-a-victim-of-its-own-success-%28AUR-57-02%29-17935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Tertiary Education Union [NTEU]. (2015). State of the Uni Survey 2015: Report #2 (Workloads). South Melbourne, VIC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nteu.org.au/library/view/id/6308
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2013). Academic dystopia: Knowledge, performativity, and tertiary education. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 35(1), 27–43. doi:10.1080/10714413.2013.753757
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M., & Germov, J. (2015). Bringing the budget back into academic work allocation models: A management perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(5), 507–518. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2015.1079398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardi, I. (2009). The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life. Higher Education, 57(4), 499. doi;10.1007/s10734-008-9159-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R., King, R., Dekeyser, S., Bare, L., & Baldock, C. (2015). Current practice in academic workload allocation processes in Australia. In I. Dobson & R. Sharma (Eds.), Proceedings of the tertiary education management conference 2015: Leading locally, competing globally  (TEMC 2015), 30 August-2 September (pp. 203–213), Wollongong, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R., & Sarros, J. (2002). The academic work environment in Australian universities: A motivating place to work? Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 241–258. doi:10.1080/0729436022000020751
   Google Scholar