8,092
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Administrative burden in higher education institutions: a conceptualisation and a research agenda

References

  • Barham, B.L., Foltz, J.D., & Prager, D.L. (2014). Making time for science. Research Policy, 43(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.007
  • Barnett, A.G., Campbell, M.J., Shield, C., Farrington, A., Hall, L., Page, K., Gardner A, Mitchell BG., & Graves, N. (2016). The high costs of getting ethical and site-specific approvals for multi-centre research. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0023-6
  • Bentley, P.J., & Kyvik, S. (2012). Academic work from a comparative perspective: A survey of faculty working time across 13 countries. Higher Education, 63(4), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9457-4
  • Blau, P.M. (1973). The organization of academic work. Wiley.
  • Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (2015). Organizations as penetrated hierarchies: Environmental pressures and control in professional organizations. Organization Studies, 36(7), 873–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615571960
  • Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: Untangling conceptual knots. The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409602600101
  • Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2020). Robotic bureaucracy: Administrative burden and red tape in university research. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13105
  • Bozeman, B., Youtie, J., & Jung, J. (2020). Robotic bureaucracy and administrative burden: What are the effects of universities’ computer automated research grants management systems? Research Policy, 49(6), Article 103980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103980
  • Bozeman, B., Youtie, J., & Jung, J. (2021). Death by a thousand 10-minute tasks: Workarounds and noncompliance in university research administration. Administration & Society, 53(4), 527–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720947994
  • Brown, T., Goodman, J., & Yasukawa, K. (2010). Academic casualization in Australia: Class divisions in the university. Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185609359443
  • Burden, B.C., Canon, D.T., Mayer, K.R., & Moynihan, D.P. (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x
  • Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: Potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9401-z
  • Croucher, G., & Woelert, P. (2022). Administrative transformation and managerial growth: A longitudinal analysis of changes in the non-academic workforce at Australian universities. Higher Education, 84(1), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00759-8
  • Dahler-Larsen, P. (2014). Constitutive effects of performance indicators: Getting beyond unintended consequences. Public Management Review, 16(7), 969–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.770058
  • de Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards New Public Management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations: Disciplinary approaches, interfaces and integration (pp. 137–152). Springer Netherlands.
  • Enders, J., de Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education, 65(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4
  • Freedman, D.A. (2005). Linear statistical models for causation: A critical review. In B.S. Everitt & D.C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 1061–1073). Wiley.
  • Gornitzka, Å., Kyvik, S., & Larsen, I.M. (1998). The bureaucratisation of universities. Minerva, 36(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004382403543
  • Heinrich, C.J. (2016). The bite of administrative burden: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv034
  • Herbert, D.L., Barnett, A.G., Clarke, P., & Graves, N. (2013). On the time spent preparing grant proposals: An observational study of Australian researchers. BMJ Open, 3(5), e002800. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002800
  • Herd, P., & Moynihan, D.P. (2019). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
  • Jungblut, J., & Woelert, P. (2018). The changing fortunes of intermediary agencies: Reconfiguring higher education policy in Norway and Australia. In P. Maassen, M. Nerland, & L. Yates (Eds.), Reconfiguring knowledge in higher education (pp. 25–48). Springer.
  • Kenny, J., & Fluck, A.E. (2022). Emerging principles for the allocation of academic work in universities. Higher Education, 83(6), 1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00747-y
  • Krücken, G. (2014). Higher education reforms and unintended consequences: A research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949539
  • Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and New Public Management. Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599–629. https://doi.org/10.1086/664553
  • Luhmann, N. (1999). Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation [Functions and consequences of formal organisation]. Dunker & Humblot.
  • Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2019). From organised anarchy to de-coupled bureaucracy: The transformation of university organisation. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12229
  • Marginson, S. (1997). Steering from a distance: Power relations in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 34(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003082922199
  • Martin, B.R. (2016). What’s happening to our universities? Prometheus, 34(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2016.1222123
  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Prentice-Hall.
  • Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
  • Pignata, S., Lushington, K., Sloan, J., & Buchanan, F. (2015). Employees’ perceptions of email communication, volume and management strategies in an Australian university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019121
  • Ramirez, F.O., & Christensen, T. (2012). The formalization of the university: Rules, roots, and routes. Higher Education, 65(6), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9571-y
  • Rowlands, J. (2017). Academic governance in the contemporary university: Perspectives from Anglophone nations. Springer.
  • Rush, A., Ling, R., Carpenter, J.E., Carter, C., Searles, A., & Byrne, J.A. (2018). Research governance review of a negligible-risk research project: Too much of a good thing? Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739937
  • Travers, M. (2007). The new bureaucracy: Quality assurance and its critics. Policy Press.
  • Vidovich, L. (2012). ‘Transforming Australia’s higher education system’: New accountability policies for a global era? In H.G. Schuetze, W. Bruneau, & G. Grosjean (Eds.), University governance and reform: Policy, fads, and experience in international perspective (pp. 241–255). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Vismann, C. (2008). Files: Law and media technology. Stanford University Press.
  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology. University of California Press.
  • Whitley, R. (2008). Universities as strategic actors: Limitations and variations. In L. Engwall & D. Weaire (Eds.), The university in the market (pp. 23–37). Portland Press.
  • Woelert, P. (2021). ‘Key selection criteria’ as administrative devices: An investigation of academic bureaucratization at Australian universities. Science & Public Policy, 48(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa056
  • Woelert, P., Lewis, J.M., & Le, A.T. (2021). Formally alive yet practically complex: An exploration of academics’ perceptions of their autonomy as researchers. Higher Education Policy, 34(4), 1049–1068. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00190-1
  • Woelert, P., & McKenzie, L. (2018). Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy018
  • Woelert, P., Vidovich, L., & O’Donoghue, T. (2022). Breaking the mould: A comparative study of ‘radical’ university curriculum reforms in a context of global-local policy flows. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2022.2092720
  • Yates, L., Woelert, P., Millar, V., & O’Connor, K. (2016). Knowledge at the crossroads? Physics and history in the changing world of schools and universities. Springer.