A capability perspective on indigenous autonomy

References

• Acosta, M. (2000). El Derecho de los Publeos Indígenas de las Regiones Autónomas de la Costa Atlántica de Nicaragua al Aprovechamiento sostenible de sus Bosques: el Caso de la Comunidad Mayagna de Awas Tingni [The rights of the indigenous peoples of the autonomous regions of the Atlantic coast of Nicaragua to the sustainable use of their woods: The case of the Awas Tingni community] ( Tesis per la Maestria [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]). Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua (UNAN), Nicaragua.
   Google Scholar
• Alfredsson, G. (1998). Indigenous peoples and autonomy. In M. Suksi (Ed.), Autonomy: Applications and implications (pp. 125–138). The Hague: Kluwer International.
   Google Scholar
• Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0199245797.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Alkire, S., & Deneulin, S. (2009). The human development and capability approach. In S. Deneulin & L. Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach (pp. 22–48). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, C. (2008). Movimientos Indígenas en Contra del Plan Puebla Panamá [Indigenous movements against the Plan Puebla Panamá]. In F. Garcia (Ed.), Identidades, etnicidad y racismo en América Latina [Identities, ethnicity and racism in Latin America], Collección de 50 anos (pp. 73–86). Quito: FLACSO-Sede Ecuador, Ministerio de Cultura del Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. (2003). Indigenous peoples and their lands, international standards and domestic implementation: The case of the Atlantic Coast of Nicaragua (European master’s degree in human rights and democratisation). Awarded theses of the academic year 2001/2001. Venice: Marsilio.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. (2004). Landrechte indigener Völker unter besonderer Bezugnahme auf Mexiko und Nicaragua [Land rights of indigenous peoples in Mexico and Nicaragua]. Frankfurt: Lang International.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. B. (2009). Context dependency of valuable functionings: How culture affects the capability framework. In E. Chiappero-Martinetti (Ed.), Debating global society: Reach and limits of the capability approach (pp. 203–229). Milan: Giangiacomo Feltrinelli Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Brems, M. (1995). Die politische Integration ethnischer Minderheiten [The political integration of ethnic minorities]. Frankfurt: Lang International.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, T., & Vizard, P. (2011). ‘Operationalizing’ the capability approach as a basis for equality and human rights monitoring in twenty-first-century Britain. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12, 91–119.10.1080/19452829.2011.541790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombian Constitutional Court. (1998, September 18). Resguardo Indigena Ika O Arhuaco ( Judgement SU 510/1998). Retrieved from http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1998/su510-98.htm
   Google Scholar
• Creifelds, G. (1990). Rechtswörterbuch [Legal dictionary] (10th ed.). München: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Deneulin, S. (2008). Beyond individual freedom and agency: Structures of living together in the capability approach. In F. Comim & M. Qizilbash (Eds.), The capability approach. Concepts, measures and applications (pp. 105–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Polanco, H. (1997). Indigenous peoples in Latin America. The quest for self determination. New York, NY: Westerview.
   Google Scholar
• Dinstein, Y. (2011). Autonomy regimes and international law. Villanova Law Review, 56, 437–453.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. (n.d.). Defining “Cultural Relativism”. Retrieved from http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/mmt/udhr/preamble_section_7/concept_history_2.html
   Google Scholar
• Engels, K. (2011). On fragile architecture: The UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples in the context of human rights. The European Journal of International Law, 22, 141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (2003). Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’s development as freedom. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37, 54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). The human development paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s ideas on development. Feminist Economics, 9, 301–317.10.1080/1354570022000077980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, C. (2006, September 13). Diez anos en la brecha [Ten years in the gap]. La Jornada. Retrieved from http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2006/09/18/oja113-cni.html
   Google Scholar
• Gigler, B. (2005, September 11–14). Indigenous peoples, human development and the capability approach. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on the Capability Approach Knowledge and Public Action, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Heintze, H. J. (1997). Wege zur Verwirklichung des Selbstbestimmungsrechts innerhalb bestehender Staaten [Paths for implementation of the right of self-determination in existing nation states]. In H. J. Heintze (Ed.), Selbstbestimmmungsrecht der Völker – Herausforderung der Staatenwelt (pp. 16–59). Bonn: Dietz.
   Google Scholar
• Hofbauer, S. (2003). Ist der Plan Puebla-Panama zum Scheitern verurteilt? Über die Konsultation der indigenen Völker aus menschenrechtlicher Perspektive [Is the Plan Puebla-Panama doomed to failure? A human rights perspective on the consultation of indigenous peoples]. Retrieved from http://www.oneworld.at/mexiko-plattform/Plan%20Puebla%20Panama%20-%20Ist%20der%20Plan%20zum%20Scheitern%20verurteilt.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. (2006). From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. Journal of Human Development, 7, 397–416.10.1080/14649880600815982
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. (1989, June 27). Indigenous and tribal peoples convention, C 169. Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddb6d514.html
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2001, August 31). The Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua, IACHR Series C No 79. Retrieved from http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:ihrl/1462iachr01.case.1/law-ihrl-1462iachr01.
   Google Scholar
• IACHR. (2009). Caso de la Comunidad Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni vs. Nicaragua. Supervisión de Cumplimiento de Sentencia, Resolution, 3 April 2009 [Case of the community Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni vs Nicaragua, supervision of compliance with the judgment, resolution].
   Google Scholar
• International Law Association. (2010). Rights of indigenous peoples. The Hague Conference 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1024
   Google Scholar
• International Law Association. (2012). Rights of indigenous peoples. Sofia Conference 2012. Retrieved from http://www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1024
   Google Scholar
• Ivison, D., Patton, P., & Sanders, W. (Eds.). (2000). Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. (1992). Democracy, groups and rights. In P. Jones (Ed.), Rights, issues in political theory (pp. 172–189). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuppe, R. (2000). Religionsfreiheit und Schutz der kulturellen Identität im Widerspruch? Das Erkenntnis SU-510/1998 des Verfassungsgerichtes Kolumbiens [Religious freedom and protection of the cultural identity in contradiction? The judgment SU-510/1998 of the Colombian constitutional court]. Österreichisches Archiv für Recht & Religion, 48–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship. A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mexico. (2001). Constitution of the United Mexican States, 1917 ( as amended). Retrieved from http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/cpeum.htm
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. (2014). Self-determination as a collective capability: The case of indigenous peoples. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15, 320–334.10.1080/19452829.2013.878320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normas Juridicas de Nicaragua. (1987, septiembre 7). Estatuto de la Autonomía de las Regiones de la Costa Atlántica de Nicaragua [Statute of the Autonomous regions of the Atlantic Coast of Nicaragua de Nicaragua] ( Ley No 28).
   Google Scholar
• Nicaragua. (1987). Constitution of Nicaragua 1987 ( partially revised in 1995, 2000 and 2005). Retrieved from http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Nica/nica.html
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2001). Women and human development, the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2007). Frontiers of justice, disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Harvard: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
   Google Scholar
• Organization of African Unity. (1981, June 27). African charter on human and peoples’ rights. OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982). Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3630.html
   Google Scholar
• Panzironi, F. (2009). The right to self-determination of indigenous peoples interpreted through the capability framework. In E. Chiappero-Martinetti (Ed.), Debating global society. Reach and limitations of the capability approach (pp. 301–335). Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Pernthaler, P. (1975). Land, Volk und Heimat als Kategorien des österreichischen Verfassungsrechts [Territory, people and homeland as categories of the Austrian constitutional law]. Wien: Braumüller.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, J. M. (2001, March 12). La Marcha del Color de la Tierra [The march of the colour of the earth], La Jornada. Retrieved from http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/03/12/oja167-marcha.html
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6, 93–117.10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 351–376.10.1111/jopp.2006.14.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2011). The capability approach. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2011 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/capability-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality, reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2000). The discipline of cost-benefit analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 931–952.10.1086/468100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6, 151–166.10.1080/14649880500120491
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, F. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6, 185–204.10.1080/14649880500120517
   Google Scholar
• Style, S. (2001). Down Mexico Way. The Ecologist, June 2001, 50–51.
   Google Scholar
• Suksi, M. (1998). On the entrenchment of autonomy. In M. Suksi (Ed.), Autonomy: Applications and implications (pp. 151–172). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Suksi, M. (2013, August). Autonomy. In R. Wolfrum (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Retrieved from http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL
   Google Scholar
• Szeman, I. (2005). Plan Puebla Panama. Globalization and Autonomy Glossary. Retrieved from http://www.globalautonomy.ca/global1/servlet/Glossarypdf?id=EV.0029
   Google Scholar
• Tabajdi, C. (n.d.). Current questions of international minority protection at the end of 1994. Budapest: Political Secretary of State, Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberry, P. (1998). Images of autonomy and individual and collective rights in international instruments on the rights of minorities. In M. Suksi (Ed.), Autonomy: Application and implications (pp. 97–124). The Hague: Kluwer International.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Treaty Series. (1966, December 16). International covenant on civil and political rights. UNTS 999. Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Treaty Series. (1984, December 10). Convention against torture and other inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. UNTS 1465. Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3a94.html
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (2007, September 13). Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, UN Doc A/61/295. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M., & Hohmann, J. (Eds.). (in press). The UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. A commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-un-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples-9780199673223?cc=nl&lang=en&#
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. A. (1990). Encounters on the frontiers of international human rights law: Redefining the terms of indigenous peoples survival in the world. Duke Law Journal, 39, 660–704.10.2307/1372721
   Google Scholar