1,970
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Indigenous Peoples and the Capability Approach

Indigenous peoples and the capability approach: taking stock

&

References

  • Anaya, S. J. (1996). Indigenous peoples in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ariana, P. (2012). Challenging our understanding of health: Indigenous perspectives from the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Oxford Development Studies, 40, 405–421.10.1080/13600818.2012.713098
  • Barcham, M. (2012). Thinking about Maori development in terms of the capability approach: The shift towards the adoption of the Maori potential approach. In F. Panzironi & K. Gelber (Eds.), The capability approach: Development practice and public policy in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 55–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bockstael, E. (2015). Capacity development with fishers: An approach to environmental governance. Paper presented at the 12th annual Conference of the HDCA, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, September 7–10, 2015.
  • Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Durango, CO: Kivaki Press.
  • Daes, E.-I. A. (2008). Indigenous peoples: Keepers of our past, custodians of our future. California: International Working Group for Indigenous Affairs.
  • Durie, M. (1994). Whaiora: Māori health development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Durie, M. (1998). Te Mana, Te Kawanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kawharu, M., & Watene, K. (2015). Whakataunga me ngā Wawata: Findings and aspirations (Commissioned Report No. 1, unpublished).
  • King, T. (2012). The inconvenient Indian: A curious account of native people in North America. Canada: Doubleday Canada.
  • Klein, E. (2015). A critical review of the capability approach in Australian indigenous policy (CAEPR Working Paper 102/2015). Canberra, Australia.
  • Kosko, S. J. (2011). Vulnerable minorities, group rights, and indigenous status: The case of the Saami. Paper presented at the 8th annual conference of the HDCA, 6–8 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Lindroth, M. (2014). Indigenous rights as tactics of neoliberal governance: Practices of expertise in the United Nations. Social & Legal Studies, 23, 341–360.
  • Maaka, R., & Andersen, C. (Eds.). (2006). The indigenous experience: Global perspectives. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  • McCaslin, W. D. (Ed.). (2005). Justice as healing: Indigenous ways. St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.
  • Merino Acuña, R. (2015). The politics of indigenous self-determination. Extractive industries, state policies and territorial rights in the Peruvian Amazon (PhD thesis). University of Bath, Department of Social and Policy Sciences, Bath.
  • Meyer, W. H. (2012). Indigenous rights, global governance, and state sovereignty. Human Rights Review, 13, 327–347.10.1007/s12142-012-0225-3
  • Mitchell, T. (2014). Introduction. In The internationalization of indigenous rights: UNDRIP in the Canadian context (pp. 1–4). The Centre for International Governance Innovation. Retrieved from https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/indigenous_rights_special_report_web_1.pdf
  • Murphy, M. (2014). Self-determination as a collective capability: The case of indigenous peoples. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15, 320–334.10.1080/19452829.2013.878320
  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841286
  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
  • Ozkan, U. R., & Schott, S. (2013). Sustainable development and capabilities for the polar region. Social Indicators Research, 114, 1259–1283.10.1007/s11205-012-0201-y
  • Panzironi, F. (2006). Indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination and development policy (unpublished PhD). University of Sydney.
  • Panzironi, F. (2009). The right to self-determination of indigenous peoples interpreted through the capability framework. In E. Chiappero-Martinetti (Ed.), Debating global society. Reach and limits of the capability approach (pp. 301–335). Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli, Sydney, Australia.
  • Panzironi, F. (2012). The ‘indigenous capability-right to health’ and Australia’s ‘close the gap’ indigenous health policy. In F. Panzironi & K. Gelber (Eds.), The capability approach: Development practice and public policy in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 68–83). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Schischka, J. (2012). Samoa, Vanuatu and New Zealand: Participatory monitoring and evaluation of development programmes. In F. Panzironi & K. Gelber (Eds.), The capability approach: Development practice and public policy in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 153–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Schlosberg, D., & Carruthers, D. (2010). Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 10, 12–35.10.1162/GLEP_a_00029
  • Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what?. In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Chapter 16 The tanner lecture on human values. Vol. 1, Reprinted in Amartya Sen (1982). Choice, welfare and measurement (pp. 353–369). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Knopf Press.
  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
  • Smith, L. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
  • Stenn, T. L. (2013). The cultural and political intersection of fair trade and justice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137331489
  • Taskforce on Whānau Centred Initiatives. (2010). Whānau Ora: Report of the taskforce on Whānau-centred initiatives. Report produced for Hon Tariana Turia, Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.
  • Ten Fingers, K. (2005). Rejecting, revitalizing, and reclaiming: First Nations work to set the direction of research and policy development. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96, 60–63.
  • Thompson, J. (2002). Taking responsibility for the past: Reparation and historical injustice. Cambridge: Polity.
  • UNDP. (1990–2015). Human development reports 1990–2015. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • UNPFII. (2007). United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html
  • UNPFII. (2016). United Nations permanent forum on indigenous issues. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/about-us/unpfii-history.html
  • Vaughan, D. (2010). Development, rights, and indigenous Australians – A critique of Australian Government Policy using the capability approach. Paper presented at the 7th annual conference of the HDCA, Amman, September 2010. Winner of the Kuklys Prize for best graduate paper.
  • Vaughan, D. (2011). The importance of capabilities in the sustainability of information and communications technology programs: The case of remote indigenous Australian communities. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 131–150.10.1007/s10676-011-9269-3
  • Watene, K. P. M. (2011). Valuing the environment in a diverse world. Maitreyee: The environment, March issue. Retrieved from http://www.capabilityapproach.com/pubs/Maitreyee18_Mar_11.pdf
  • Watene, K., & Yap, M. (2015). Culture and sustainable development: Indigenous contributions. Journal of Global Ethics, 11, 51–55.10.1080/17449626.2015.1010099
  • Watene, K. P. M. (2013). Indigenous visions for sustainable development law? Continuing the conversation. In K. Bosselman, P. Taylor, & D. Grinlinton (Eds.), Environmental law for a sustainable society (pp. 131–141). Auckland: New Zealand Centre for Environment Law.
  • Watene, K. P. M. (2014). Whanau capabilities: Needs and aspirations (Commissioned Report No. 3, unpublished report). Te Puni Kokiri.
  • Yap, M. L. M. (2012). Whose development? Eliciting indigenous preferences through discrete choice models. Paper presented at the 9th annual conference of the HDCA, 5–7 September 2012, Jakarta.
  • Ytrehus, L. A. (2015). Asymmetric gift exchange: Challenges, capabilities and power in the case of Norwegian and Bolivian partner NGOs in pro-poor development cooperation amongst Aymaras. Paper presented at the 12th annual conference of the HDCA, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, September 7–10, 2015.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.