The False Promise of Multi-stakeholder Governance: Depoliticising Private Military and Security Companies

References

• Abbott, Kenneth W., Philipp Genschel, Duncan Snidal, and Bernhard Zangl. 2015. “Orchestration: Global Governance Through Intermediaries.” In International Organizations as Orchestrators, edited by Kenneth W. Abbott, and Philipp Genschel, 3–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamsen, Rita, and Anna Leander. 2016. “Introduction.” Chap. 1 In Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies, edited by Rita Abrahamsen, and Anna Leander, 1–7. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamsen, Rita, and Michael C. Williams. 2011. Security Beyond the State. Private Security in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2004a. “Call For Corporate Accountability in Iraq.” Accessed November 13 2013. http://web.archive.org/web/20041019214211/http://takeaction.amnestyusa.org/action/display/wacmoreinfo.asp?item=10897.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2004b. “Taking on the Titans.” Accessed November 13 2013. http://web.archive.org/web/20041010060752/http://www.amnestyusa.org/business/taking_on_the_titans.html.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2006a. “Dead on Time – Arms Transportation, Brokering and the Threat to Human Rights.” Accessed November 13 2018. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/68000/act300082006en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2006b. “USA: Below the Radar: Secret Flights to Torture and ‘Disappearance’.” Accessed November 14 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20110907041021/http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/051/2006/en/b543c574-fa09-11dd-b1b0-c961f7df9c35/amr510512006en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2012. “The Costs of Outsourcing War.” Accessed January 16 2013. http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/business-and-human-rights/private-military-and-security-companies.
   Google Scholar
• ASIS International. 2012. ANSI/ASIS PSC.1-2012 Management System for Quality of Private Security Company Operations - Requirements with Guidance. Alexandria.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah, and Lee Sigelman. 2010. “Private Security and Democracy: Lessons From the US in Iraq.” Security Studies 19 (2): 230–265. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2010.480906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah, and Oliver Westerwinter. 2016. The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann-Pauly, Dorothée, Justine Nolan, Auret van Heerden, and Michael Samway. 2016. “Industry-Specific Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives That Govern Corporate Human Rights Standards: Legitimacy Assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative.” Journal of Business Ethics 143 (4), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur, Dorothea, and Hans Peter Schmitz. 2012. “Corporations and NGOs: When Accountability Leads to Co-Optation.” Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1): 9–21. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1057-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, Karin. 2006. “Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness.” European Environment 16 (5): 290–306. doi: 10.1002/eet.425
   Google Scholar
• Beerli, Christine. 2012. “A Humanitarian Perspective on the Privatization of Warfare. September 14."International Committee of the Red Cross, Accessed October 15 2013. http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/statement/2012/privatization-war-statement-2012-09-06.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bellingham, Henry. 2011. “Written Ministrial Statement. Promoting High Standards in the Private Military and Security Company Industry. June 21."Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Accessed February 5 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/promoting-high-standards-in-the-private-military-and-security-company-industry–2.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, Alexandra, Kerry Senior, and Adam White. 2012. “The United Kingdom.” Chap. 15 In Multilevel Regulation of Military and Security Contractors: The Interplay Between International, European and Domestic Norms, edited by Mirko Sossai, and Christine Bakker, 309–328. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, Magnus, and Kristina Tamm Hallström. 2010. “NGO Power in Global Social and Environmental Standard-Setting.” Global Environmental Politics 10 (4): 36–59. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Doug, and Matan Chorev. 2008. “Ruthless Humanitarianism. Why Marginalizing Private Peacekeeping Kills People.” In Private Military and Security Companies: Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations, edited by Marina Caparini, Deane-Peter Barker, and Andrew Alexandra, 116–131. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, Jim, and Matthew Flinders. 2005. “The Domestic Origins of Depoliticisation in the Area of British Economic Policy.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 7 (4): 526–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00205.x
   Google Scholar
• Bures, Oldrich, and Jeremy Meyer. 2019. “The Anti-Mercenary Norm and United Nations’ Use of Private Military and Security Companies.” Global Governance 25 (1): 77–99. doi: 10.1163/19426720-02501002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, Peter. 2001. “New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 3 (2): 127–149. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00054
   Google Scholar
• CAAT. 2009. “Response from the Campaign Against Arms Trade to the Consultation on Private Military and Security Companies.” Accessed November 13 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20120806235706/www.caat.org.uk/resources/publications/government/FCO_PMSC_consultation_July09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. Charli. 2007. “Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (1): 99–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, Madeline. 2015. “Power Plays in Global Internet Governance.” Millennium 43 (2): 640–659. doi: 10.1177/0305829814562655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheyns, Emanuelle, and Lone Riisgaard. 2014. “The Exercise of Power Through Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives for Sustainable Agriculture and its Inclusion and Exclusion Outcomes.” Agriculture and Human Values 31 (3): 409–423. doi: 10.1007/s10460-014-9508-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dany, Charlotte. 2014. “Janus-Faced NGO Participation in Global Governance: Structural Constrains for NGO Influence.” Global Governance 20 (3): 419–436. doi: 10.1163/19426720-02003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCAF. 2015. “The Montreux Document. The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.” Accessed November 13 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20170824113938/www.dcaf.ch/Project/The-Montreux-Document.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus. 2005. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn From the World Commission on Dams?” Global Governance 11 (1): 65–83. doi: 10.1163/19426720-01101006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Paul, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, and Matthew Wood. 2017a. Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Paul, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, and Matthew Wood. 2017b. “Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance.” In Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance, edited by Paul Fawcett, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, and Matthew Wood, 3–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FCO. 2002. “Private Military Companies: Options for Regulation."Foreign and Commonwealth Office. HC 577, Accessed February 05 2014. http://psm.du.edu/media/documents/national_regulations/countries/europe/united_kingdom/united_kingdom_white_paper_on_regulatory_options_for_private_military_companies_2002-english.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FCO. 2009a. Consultation Document. Consultation on Promoting High Standards of Conduct by Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) Internationally. London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
   Google Scholar
• FCO. 2009b. Impact Assessment on Promoting High Standards of Conduct by Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) Internationally. London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
   Google Scholar
• FCO. 2010. “Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs): Summary of Public Consultation Working Group. Foreign and Commonwealth Office. April 2010.” Accessed February 4 2014. http://www.caat.org.uk/issues/corporate-mercenaries/pmsc-working-group-summary-060410.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FDFA. 2015. “The Montreux Document." Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Accessed July 10 2015. https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/fdfa/foreign-policy/international-law/international-humanitarian-law/private-military-security-companies/montreux-document.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, James. 1990. The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, Matthew, and Jim Buller. 2006. “Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools.” British Politics 1 (3): 293–318. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200016
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Affairs Committee. 2002. “Private Military Companies. Ninth Report of Session 2001–2002."House of Commons, HC 922, Accessed September 6 2017. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmfaff/922/922.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Affairs Committee. 2008. “Human Rights Annual Report 2007. Ninth Report of Session 2007–08. HC 533."The Stationery Office Limited, Accessed February 5 2014. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmfaff/533/533.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, Luc W., and Ans Kolk. 2007. “Global Rule-Setting for Business: A Critical Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Standards.” Organization 14 (5): 667–684. doi: 10.1177/1350508407080305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Doris. 2005. “Commanding Heights? The Strength and Fragility of Business Power in Global Politics.” Millennium - Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 771–801. doi: 10.1177/03058298050330030501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”. Edition Suhrkamp. 5. Aufl., 51.-65. Tsd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Thomas, and Charles Roger. 2014. “Orchestration and Transnational Climate Governance.” The Review of International Organizations 9 (1): 59–82. doi: 10.1007/s11558-013-9174-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2014. “Depoliticisation as Process, Governance as Practice: What Did the ‘First Wave’ Get Wrong and Do We Need a ‘Second Wave’ to Put it Right?” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 293–311. doi: 10.1332/030557314X13959960668217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, Clayton. 2005. “Dogs of War to Face New Curbs in Foreign Office Crackdown.” The Independent on Sunday, 13 May, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights First. 2008. “Private Security Contractors at War. Ending the Culture of Impunity.” Accessed June 9 2013. http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/08115-usls-psc-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights First. 2010. “Written Testimony for the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hearing on “Are Private Security Contractors Performing Inherently Governmental Functions”.” Accessed June 9 2013. http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/CWC-Hearing_Written_Testimony.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2012. “The Grey Zone.” Red Cross Magazine 2012 (03): 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC, and FDFA. 2008. “The Montreux Document on Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States Related to Operations of Private Military and Security Companies During Armed Conflict.” Accessed February 10 2016. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0996.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, Hans-Martin. 2007. ““Global Civil Society” and the Political Depoliticization of Global Governance.” International Political Sociology 1 (3): 257–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Laura. 2011. “The Difference Genealogy Makes: Strategies for Politicisation or How to Extend Capacities for Autonomy.” Political Studies 59 (1): 156–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00844.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerbi, Scott. 2012. “Assessing the Roles of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives in Advancing the Business and Human Rights Agenda.” International Review of the Red Cross 94 (887): 1027–1046. doi: 10.1017/S1816383113000398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta. 2007. Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta, and Andrea Schneiker. 2012. “New Humanitarians? Frame Appropriation Through Private Military and Security Companies.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40 (2): 365–388. doi: 10.1177/0305829811425890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta, and Andrea Schneiker. 2015. “NGOS and the Price of Governance: The Trade-Offs Between Regulating and Criticizing Private Military and Security Companies.” Critical Military Studies 1 (3): 185–201. doi: 10.1080/23337486.2015.1050270
   Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krahmann, Elke. 2008. “Security: Collective Good or Commodity?” European Journal of International Relations 14 (3): 379–404. doi: 10.1177/1354066108092304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahmann, Elke. 2012. “From ‘Mercenaries’ to ‘Private Security Contractors’: The (Re)Construction of Armed Security Providers in International Legal Discourses.” Millennium - Journal of International Studies 40 (2): 343–363. doi: 10.1177/0305829811426673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahmann, Elke. 2016. “Choice, Voice, and Exit: Consumer Power and the Self-Regulation of the Private Security Industry.” European Journal of International Security 1 (01): 27–48. doi: 10.1017/eis.2015.6
   Google Scholar
• Krahmann, Elke. 2017. “From Performance to Performativity: The Legitimization of US Security Contracting and its Consequences.” Security Dialogue 48 (6): 541–559. doi: 10.1177/0967010617722650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, Andreas. 2014. “Theorising the Use of Private Military and Security Companies: A Synthetic Perspective.” Journal of International Relations and Development 17 (1): 112–141. doi: 10.1057/jird.2013.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, Claudia. 2017. “Depoliticization, Repoliticization, and Deliberative Systems.” In Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance, edited by Paul Fawcett, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, and Matt Wood, 40–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna. 2011. “Risk and the Fabrication of Apolitical, Unaccountable Military Markets: The Case of the CIA ‘Killing Program’.” Review of International Studies 37 (5): 2253–2268. doi: 10.1017/S026021051100043X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna. 2012. “What do Codes of Conduct Do? Hybrid Constitutionalization and Militarization in Military Markets.” Global Constitutionalism 1 (1): 91–119. doi: 10.1017/S2045381711000074
   Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna. 2016. “The Politics of Whitelisting: Regulatory Work and Topologies in Commercial Security.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (1): 48–66. doi: 10.1177/0263775815616971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, Anna, and Rens van Munster. 2007. “Private Security Contractors in the Debate About Darfur: Reflecting and Reinforcing Neo-Liberal Governmentality.” International Relations 21 (2): 201–216. doi: 10.1177/0047117807077004
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S. 2008. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/07388940701860318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilly, Damian. 2000. “The Privatization of Security and Peacebuilding: A Framework for Action."International Alert, Policy and Advocacy Department, Accessed October 30 2013. http://psm.du.edu/media/documents/reports_and_stats/ngo_reports/intlalert_lilly_private_security_peacebuilding_2000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Sorcha. 2015. “Private Security Companies and Shared Responsibility: The Turn to Multistakeholder Standard-Setting and Monitoring Through Self-Regulation-‘Plus’.” Netherlands International Law Review 62 (1): 119–140. doi: 10.1007/s40802-015-0017-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, Jon D. 2004. “Beyond Accountability: The Constitutional, Democratic, and Strategic Problems with Privatizing War.” Washington University Law Quarterly 82 (3): 1001–2004.
   Google Scholar
• Moog, Sandra, André Spicer, and Steffen Böhm. 2015. “The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council.” Journal of Business Ethics 128 (3): 469–493. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-2033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, Claire Methven, Amol Mehra, and Nicole Vander Meulen. 2016. “Public Procurement and Human Rights: A Survey of Twenty Jurisdictions."International Learning Lab on Public Procurement and Human Rights, Accessed August 12 2019. https://www.hrprocurementlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Public-Procurement-and-Human-Rights-A-Survey-of-Twenty-Jurisdictions-Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Palazzo, Guido, and Andreas Georg Scherer. 2006. “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1): 71–88. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9044-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly, Louis W. 2001. “Global Finance, Political Authority, and the Problem of Legitimation.” In The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, edited by Rodney Bruce Hall, and Thomas J. Biersteker, 76–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Percy, Sarah. 2007a. Mercenaries. The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Percy, Sarah. 2007b. “Morality and Regulation.” In From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies, edited by Simon Chesterman, and Chia Lehnardt, 11–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Percy, Sarah. 2012. “Regulating the Private Security Industry: A Story of Regulating the Last War.” International Review of the Red Cross 94 (887): 941–960. doi: 10.1017/S1816383113000258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingeot, Lou. 2014. “Contracting Insecurity. Private Military and Security Companies and the Future of the United Nations."Global Policy Forum and Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Bonn/New York, Accessed 04/23/2014, http://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/GPFEurope/PMSC_2014_Contracting_Insecurity_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prem, Berenike. 2020. Private Military and Security Companies as Global Governors: From Barricades to Boardrooms. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• SCEG. 2013. “About the SCEG.” Accessed February 5 2014. https://www.adsgroup.org.uk/pages/19813174.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Schakowski, Jan. 2007. “Stop Outsourcing Security Act, H.R. 4102." 110th Congress, 2007–2009, Accessed September 6 2017. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr4102/text.
   Google Scholar
• Schäferhoff, Marco, Sabine Campe, and Christopher Kaan. 2009. “Transnational Public-Private Partnerships in International Relations: Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks, and Results.” International Studies Review 11 (3): 451–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00869.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiker, Andrea, and Jutta Joachim. 2018. “Revisiting Global Governance in Multistakeholder Initiatives: Club Governance Based on Ideational Prealignments.” Global Society 32 (1): 2–22. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2017.1377688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft. 2010. “International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.” Accessed February 12 2016. http://web.archive.org/web/20110726170210/http://www.icoc-psp.org/uploads/INTERNATIONAL_CODE_OF_CONDUCT_Final_without_Company_Names.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seiberth, Corinna. 2014. Private Military and Security Companies in International Law. A Challenge for Non-Binding Norm: The Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers. Cambridge: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds, Mark. 2012. “Written Ministerial Statement. Private Security Companies. December 17."Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Accessed August 21 2013. http://psm.du.edu/media/documents/national_regulations/countries/europe/united_kingdom/uk_2012_fco-statement_adoption_of_asis-psc1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane. 2017. “Global Governance Depoliticized: Knowledge Networks, Scientization, and Anti-Policy.” In Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance, edited by Paul Fawcett, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, and Matt Wood, 91–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trumpy, Alexa J. 2008. “Subject to Negotiation: The Mechanisms Behind Co-Optation and Corporate Reform.” Social Problems 55 (4): 480–500. doi: 10.1525/sp.2008.55.4.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volk, Christian. 2018. “On a Radical Democratic Theory of Political Protest: Potentials and Shortcomings.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2018.1555684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• War on Want. 2007. “‘Stop Mercenaries Abuse’ Call.” Accessed November 13 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20130620070257/http://www.waronwant.org/news/press-releases/15217-stop-mercenaries-abuse-call.
   Google Scholar
• War on Want. 2008. “Getting Away With Murder. The Need for Action on UK Private Military and Security Companies.” Accessed November 13 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20150406145856/http://www.waronwant.org/attachments/Getting%20Away%20with%20Murder.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• War on Want, and CAAT. 2006. “Corporate Mercenaries: The Threat of Private Military and Security Companies.” Accessed November 13 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20100616185416/https://www.waronwant.org/attachments/Corporate%20Mercenaries.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• White, Nigel D. 2016. “Regulation of the Private Military and Security Sector: Is the UK Fulfilling its Human Rights Duties?” Human Rights Law Review 16 (3): 585–599. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngw019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Matt, and Matthew Flinders. 2014. “Rethinking Depoliticisation: Beyond the Governmental.” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar