Advocacy Coalition Constellations and Norm Collisions: Insights from International Drug Control, Human Trafficking, and Child Labour

References

• Abramson, Kara. 2003. “Beyond Consent, Toward Safeguarding Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations Trafficking Protocol.” Harvard International Law Journal 44 (2): 473–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58 (2): 239–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almagro, Maria Martin de. 2018. “Lost Boomerangs, the Rebound Effect and Transnational Advocacy Networks: A Discursive Approach to Norm Diffusion.” Review of International Studies 44 (4): 672–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Kenneth. 2000. “The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organisations and the Idea of International Civil Society.” European Journal for International Law 11: 91–120.
   Google Scholar
• Andreas, Peter, and Ethan A. Nadelmann. 2006. Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgarten, Britta, and Nina Amelung. 2017. “Public Participation and Social Movement Research: Connecting Perspectives to Gain Broader, Sharper and More Innovative Insights About Transnational Political Participation?” Global Society 31 (1): 144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belloni, Roberto. 2014. “Civil Society and the Responsibility to Protect.” Global Society 28 (2): 158–179.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Tobias. 2017. Global Norms and Local Courts: Translating the Rule of Law in Bangladesh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bewley-Taylor, David R. 2004. “Harm Reduction and the Global Drug Control Regime: Contemporary Problems and Future Prospects.” Drug and Alcohol Review 23 (4): 483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewley-Taylor, David R. 2009. “The 2009 Commission on Narcotic Drugs and its High Level Segment: More Cracks in the Vienna Consensus.” Drugs and Alcohol Today 9 (2): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, William, and Edella Schlager. 1996. “A Comparison of Three Emerging Theories of the Policy Process.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (3): 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodgood, Elizabeth A., and Emily Clough. 2016. “Transnational Advocacy Networks: A Complex Adaptive Systems Simulation Model of the Boomerang Effect.” Social Science Computer Review 35 (3): 319–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, Clifford. 2010. “Packing Heat: Pro-Gun Groups and the Governance of Small Arms.” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Deborah D. Avant, Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, 183–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyden, Jo, and Deborah Levison, Expert Group on Developmental Issues, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm. 2000. Children as Economic and Social Actors in the Development Process.
   Google Scholar
• Brem, Stefan, and Ken Rutherford. 2001. “Walking Together or Divided Agenda? Comparing Landmines and Small-Arms Campaigns.” Security Dialogue 32 (2): 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruch, Elizabeth M. 2004. “Models Wanted: The Search for an Effective Response to Human Trafficking.” Stanford Journal of International Law 40 (1): 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckmüller, Karin, and Stefan Schuhmann. 2012. “Crime Control versus Social Work Approaches in the Context of the “3P” Paradigm: Prevention, Protection, Prosecution.” In Human Trafficking, edited by John Winterdyk, Benjamin Perrin, and Philip Reichel, 103–127. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke-Shyne, N., Joanne Csete, Duncan Wilson, Edward Fox, Daniel Wolfe, and Jennifer J. K. Rasanathan. 2017. “How Drug Control Policy and Practice Undermine Access to Controlled Medicines.” Health and Human Rights 19 (1): 237–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. Charli. 2007. “Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (1): 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. Charli. 2014. “Lost” Causes: Agenda Vetting in Global Issue Networks and the Shaping of Human Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charnysh, Volha, Paulette Lloyd, and Beth A. Simmons. 2015. “Frames and Consensus Formation in International Relations: The Case of Trafficking in Persons.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (2): 323–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, Janie A. 2006. “The United States as Global Sheriff: Using Unilateral Sanctions to Combat Human Trafficking.” Michigan Journal of International Law 27 (2): 437–494.
   Google Scholar
• Ciplet, David. 2019. “Means of the Marginalized: Embedded Transnational Advocacy Networks and the Transformation of Neoliberal Global Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (2): 296–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, Warren 2008. Transnational Advocacy Coalitions and Human Security Initiatives: Explaining Success and Failure. Berlin: Hertie School of Governance – working paper No. 35. http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2013/4249/pdf/35.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CND (Commission on Narcotic Drugs). 2009. Report on the Fifty-Second Session E/CN.7/2009/12. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/V09/825/56/PDF/V0982556.pdf?OpenElement.
   Google Scholar
• Cogburn, Derrick L. 2017. Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Information Society: Partners or Pawns?Information Technology and Global Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, Alexander, and James Ron. 2002. “The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action.” International Security 27 (1): 5–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, Marianne. 2007. “The Negotiable Child: The ILO Child Labour Campaign 1919-1973.” PhD diss., Department of Law, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Lisbeth Zimmermann. 2020. “Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms.” International Studies Review 22 (1): 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, Jan, Andrea Liese, and Eva Senghaas-Knobloch. 2002. The International Labour Organization (ILO) in the Perspective of Organisational Learning. Bremen: artec-paper No. 94. https://www.uni-bremen.de/fileadmin/user_upload/sites/artec/Publikationen/artec_Paper/094_paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ditmore, Melissa. 2012. “Trafficking in Lives: How Ideology Shapes Policy.” In Trafficking and Prostitution Reconsidered, edited by Kamala Kempadoo, Jyoti Sanghera, and Bandana Pattanaik, 107–126. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Díez García, Rubén. 2017. “The “Indignados” in Space and Time: Transnational Networks and Historical Roots.” Global Society 31 (1): 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doezema, Jo. 2005. “Now You See Her, Now You Don’t: Sex Workers at the UN Trafficking Protocol Negotiation.” Social & Legal Studies 14 (1): 61–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations. Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farquharson, Karen. 2003. “Influencing Policy Transnationally: Pro-and Anti-Tobacco Global Advocacy Networks.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62 (4): 80–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehl, Caroline. 2018. Navigating Norm Complexity: A Shared Research Agenda for Diverse Constructivist Perspectives. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: PRIF Working Paper No. 41. https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/PRIF_WP_41.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fehl, Caroline, and Elvira Rosert. 2020. It's Complicated: A Conceptual Framework for Studying Relations and Interactions between International Norms. Frankfurt/Main: PRIF Working Papers No. 49. https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/PRIF_WP_49.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha. 2000. “Are Legal Norms Distinctive?” Journal of International Law & Politics 32 (3): 699–705.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, Alec. 2007. The Worldwide Movement Against Child Labour: Progress and Future Directions. Geneva: International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gholiagha, Sassan, Anna Holzscheiter, and Andrea Liese. 2020. “Activating Norm Collisions: Interface Conflicts in International Drug Control.” Global Constitutionalism - Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law 9 (2): 290–317.
   Google Scholar
• Grillot, Suzette R. 2011. “Global Gun Control: Examining the Consequences of Competing International Norms.” Global Governance 17: 529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, Jennifer. 2015. Networks in Contention - The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, Kristina, and Anna Holzscheiter. 2013. “The Ambivalence of Advocacy: Representation and Contestation in Global NGO Advocacy for Child Workers and Sex Workers.” Global Society 27 (4): 497–520.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, Shareen. 2006a. “New Moves in Transnational Advocacy: Getting Labor and Economic Rights on the Agenda in Unexpected Ways.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 12 (3): 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, Shareen. 2006b. Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change among Transnational Activists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, Anna. 2016. “Representation as Power and Performative Practice:: Global Civil Society Advocacy for Working Children.” Review of International Studies 42 (2): 205–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, Anna. 2018. “Affectedness, Empowerment and Norm Contestation–Children and Young People as Social Agents in International Politics.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 3 (5–6): 345–663.
   Google Scholar
• Homburger, Zine. 2019. “The Necessity and Pitfall of Cybersecurity Capacity Building for Norm Development in Cyberspace.” Global Society 33 (2): 224–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwood, Genevieve. 2009. “CND Moments – Germany’s Intervention.” Drugs and Alcohol Today 9 (2): 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Alan. 2001. “NGOs’ Transnational Advocacy Networks: From ‘Legitimacy’ to ‘Political Responsibility’?” Global Networks 1 (4): 331–352.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Counci. 2010. Report of the Human Rights Council on its twelfth session. February 25.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office (International Labour Organization). 1996. Child Labour. Targeting the Intolerable. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• IPEC (International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour). n.d. https://www.ilo.org/ipec/Campaignandadvocacy/Youthinaction/C182-Youth-orientated/worstforms/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobi, Anja P. 2013. Common Goods and Evils?: The Formation of Global Crime Governance. First edition ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jelsma, Martin. 2003. “Drugs in the UN System: The Unwritten History of the 1998 United Nations General Assembly Special Session on Drugs.” The International Journal of Drug Policy 14 (2): 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Jelsma, Martin. 2017. “UNGASS 2016: Prospects for Treaty Reform and UN System-Wide Coherence on Drug Policy.” Journal of Drug Policy Analysis 10 (1): 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Paul A. Sabatier. 1993. “The Study of Public Policy Processes.” In Policy Change and Learning, edited by Paul A. Sabatier, and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, 1–9. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, Jutta. 2003. “Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women's Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (2): 247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, Ann D. 2002. “Human Rights or Wrongs? The Struggle for a Rights-Based Response to Trafficking in Human Beings.” Trafficking and Slavery 10 (1): 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Lisa, and Peter van Tuijl. 2000. “Political Responsibility in Transnational NGO Advocacy.” World Development 28 (12): 2051–2065.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, and Michael Zürn. 2020. “After Fragmentation: Norm Collisions, Interface Conflicts, and Conflict Management.” Global Constitutionalism 9 (2): 241–267.
   Google Scholar
• Lantis, Jeffrey S., and Carmen Wunderlich. 2018. “Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters: Norm Contestation and International Cooperation.” Review of International Studies 44 (3): 570–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, Harry G. 2003. “Global Drug Prohibition: Its Uses and Crises.” The International Journal of Drug Policy 14 (2): 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Liese, Andrea. 2009. “Exceptional Necessity: How Liberal Democracies Contest the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment When Countering Terrorism.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 5 (1): 17–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lobasz, Jennifer K. 2019. Constructing Human Trafficking Evangelicals, Feminists, and an Unexpected Alliance. Edited by Chiseche Mibenge and Irene Hadiprayitno. Human Rights Interventions. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan imprint, Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Locher, Birgit. 2007. Trafficking in Women in the European Union: Norms, Advocacy-Networks and Policy Change. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Luxon, Emily Matthews, and Wendy H. Wong. 2017. “Agenda-Setting in Greenpeace and Amnesty: The Limits of Centralisation in International NGOs.” Global Society 31 (4): 479–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matti, Simon, and Annica Sandström. 2013. “The Defining Elements of Advocacy Coalitions: Continuing the Search for Explanations for Coordination and Coalition Structures.” Review of Policy Research 30 (2): 240–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean, David. 2007. Transnational Organized Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, Lori. 2016. “Power and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management 5 (5): 309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljeteig, Per (The World Bank). 2000. Creating partnerships with working children and youth. Washington, DC. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:27007.
   Google Scholar
• MOLACNATS (Secretariat of the Latin American and Caribbean Movement of Working Children and Adolescents). 2017. Open Letter: Complaint to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-trafficking-and-slavery/secretariat-of-movement-of-latin-american-and-caribbean-working-children-and-adolescen/.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Harald, and Carmen Wunderlich, eds. 2013. Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, William E. 2001. “The Right Rights? Child Labor in a Globalizing World.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 575 (1): 38–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrstad, Geir. 1999. “What Can Trade Unions Do to Combat Child Labour?” Childhood 6 (1): 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society.” International Organization 44 (4): 479–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panke, Diana, and Ulrich Petersohn. 2012. “Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes.” European Journal of International Relations 18 (4): 719–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Richard. 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines.” International Organization 5 (3): 613–644.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, Maria G. 2011. “Rethinking the Impact of Transnational Advocacy Networks.” New Global Studies 5, Article 2 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, Simon. 2018. “Promoting Pro-Health Policies Across Regimes: Global AIDS Institutions and the Harm Reduction Debate.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 24 (2): 267–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, Simon, and Owain David Williams, eds. 2011. Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, eds. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, Wayne. 2008. “Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules against Wartime Plunder.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 101–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, Wayne, and Kendall Stiles. 2009. International Norms and Cycles of Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiker, Andrea. 2021. “Norm Sabotage: Conceptual Reflection on a Phenomenon That Challenges Well-Established Norms.” International Studies Perspective 22 (1): 106–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2004. “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance.” Government and Opposition 39 (2): 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz, Karolin, and Jens Martens. 2017. “Philanthrolateralism: Private Funding and Corporate Influence in the United Nations.” Global Policy 8 (S5): 46–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Yoon Jin. 2018. A Transnational Human Rights Approach to Human Trafficking: Empowering the Powerless. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Siller, Nicole J. 2017. “Human Trafficking in International Law Before the Palermo Protocol.” Netherlands International Law Review 64 (3): 407–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolin, David M. 1999. “Conflict and Ideology in the International Campaign against Child Labour.” Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal 16 (2): 383–450.
   Google Scholar
• Stroup, Sarah S., and Wendy H. Wong. 2017. The Authority Trap - Strategic Choices of International NGOs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, Thomas Sommerer, Theresa Squatrito, and Christer Jönsson. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations - Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS, and World Health Organization. 1998. Report on the Global HIV/AIDS Epidemic http://data.unaids.org/pub/report/1998/19981125_global_epidemic_report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• White, Ben. 1994. “Children, Work and Child Labour: Changing Responses to the Employment of Children.” Development and Change 25 (4): 849–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2018. Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, Carla. 2018. “Norm Structure, Diffusion, and Evolution: A Conceptual Approach.” European Journal of International Relations 24 (3): 638–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Daniel, and Roxanne Saucier. 2010. “In Rehabilitation's Name? Ending Institutionalised Cruelty and Degrading Treatment of People Who Use Drugs.” The International Journal on Drug Policy 21 (3): 145–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2011. Ensuring Balance in National Policies on Controlled Substances. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, Gillian. 2016. The International Politics of Human Trafficking. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Youde, Jeremy. 2013. “The Rockefeller and Gates Foundations in Global Health Governance.” Global Society 27 (2): 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Zajak, Sabrina. 2017. “Rethinking Pathways of Transnational Activism.” Global Society 31 (1): 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2017. Global Norms with a Local Face: Rule-of-Law Promotion and Norm Translation. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar